Literature DB >> 24796960

Risk of advanced lesions at first follow-up colonoscopy in high-risk groups as defined by the United Kingdom post-polypectomy surveillance guideline: data from a single U.S. center.

Krishna C Vemulapalli1, Douglas K Rex1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom (U.K.) post-adenoma resection guidelines recommend earlier surveillance for patients with 5 or more adenomas or 3 to 4 adenomas of which one is 10 mm or larger compared with U.S. guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of using the U.K. guideline on a U.S. cohort of adenoma patients.
DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective study.
SETTING: Indiana University Hospital and an associated ambulatory surgery center. PATIENTS: A total of 1414 patients with baseline adenoma findings belonging to one of 5 risk categories and with a follow-up colonoscopy more than 200 days later. INTERVENTION: Colonoscopy, polypectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Incidence of advanced lesions at follow-up colonoscopy.
RESULTS: Advanced neoplasms at follow-up occurred in 16.3% of patients with 5 or more adenomas including 1 that was 10 mm or larger, 8.6% of patients with 3 or 4 adenomas including 1 that was 10 mm or larger, 5% of those with 5 or more adenomas all smaller than 10 mm, 1.8% of those with 3 or 4 adenomas all smaller than 10 mm, and 1.4% of those with 1 to 2 adenomas smaller than 10 mm. Logistic regression analyses showed that the rate of advanced lesions at first follow-up was increased in persons with 3 or more baseline adenomas and at least 1 that is 10 mm or larger compared with those with 1 to 4 small baseline adenomas. LIMITATIONS: Single-center, retrospective study.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate the U.K. guideline predicts higher risk groups for advanced neoplasia at first follow-up. Our study had inadequate power to show better prediction of incident cancer. Additional study of other databases is warranted.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24796960     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.1029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  11 in total

1.  Does Colon Polyp Surveillance Improve Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  David Lieberman; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Extent of atypical hyperplasia stratifies breast cancer risk in 2 independent cohorts of women.

Authors:  Amy C Degnim; William D Dupont; Derek C Radisky; Robert A Vierkant; Ryan D Frank; Marlene H Frost; Stacey J Winham; Melinda E Sanders; Jeffrey R Smith; David L Page; Tanya L Hoskin; Celine M Vachon; Karthik Ghosh; Tina J Hieken; Lori A Denison; Jodi M Carter; Lynn C Hartmann; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Colonoscopy: the current king of the hill in the USA.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Risk factors of nonadherence to colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and its impact on clinical outcomes: a KASID multicenter study.

Authors:  Chung Hyun Tae; Chang Mo Moon; Seong-Eun Kim; Sung-Ae Jung; Chang Soo Eun; Jae Jun Park; Geom Seog Seo; Jae Myung Cha; Sung Chul Park; Jaeyoung Chun; Hyun Jung Lee; Yunho Jung; Jin Oh Kim; Young-Eun Joo; Dong Il Park
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Thinking Big About Small Adenomas: Moving Toward "Precision Surveillance".

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; James East; Colin J Rees; Neil Cripps; James Docherty; Sunil Dolwani; Philip V Kaye; Kevin J Monahan; Marco R Novelli; Andrew Plumb; Brian P Saunders; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Damian J M Tolan; Sophie Whyte; Stewart Bonnington; Alison Scope; Ruth Wong; Barbara Hibbert; John Marsh; Billie Moores; Amanda Cross; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 31.793

9.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 12.045

10.  New risk stratification after colorectal polypectomy reduces burden of surveillance without increasing mortality.

Authors:  Elisabeth Waldmann; Andreas Kammerlander; Irina Gessl; Daniela Penz; Barbara Majcher; Anna Hinterberger; Michael Trauner; Monika Ferlitsch
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.