Literature DB >> 24794316

Human oocyte cryopreservation with slow freezing versus vitrification. Results from the National Italian Registry data, 2007-2011.

Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti1, Eleonora Porcu2, Pasquale Patrizio3, Vincenzo Vigiliano4, Roberto de Luca4, Paola d'Aloja4, Roberta Spoletini4, Giulia Scaravelli4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare mature human oocytes cryopreservation with slow freezing (SF) and vitrification (VT) in infertile couples.
DESIGN: Retrospective study of national Italian data submitted during the period 2007-2011.
SETTING: National ART registry. PATIENT(S): Infertile patients with supernumerary oocytes. INTERVENTION(S): Thawing or warming of cryopreserved oocytes and ICSI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): oocyte survival, fertilization, implantation and clinical pregnancy rate between SF and VT. RESULT(S): A total of 14,328 cycles with 11,599 transfers, 1,850 pregnancies, 1,168 deliveries and 1,342 babies born were analyzed from 146 reporting centers (range of cycles 1-1,255 per center). The SF oocytes' survival rate was lower than in VT (51.1% vs. 63.1%). Fertilization rate was significantly higher in SF than in VT (SF 71.6% vs. VT 70.1%). VT showed a significantly higher pregnancy rate, both per started cycle (14.4% vs. 12.0%) and per transfer (18.0% vs. 14.8%), and implantation rate (9.5% vs. 8.1%) than SF. However, the range and median pregnancy rate per started cycle were, respectively, 0%-50% and 7.7% in SF and 0%-100% and 6.7% in VT. CONCLUSION(S): VT showed a statistically significant higher performance than SF. As with other ART procedures, the results are not homogeneous among clinics and protocols, but the confirm the clinical value of oocyte cryopreservation in infertile patients.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ART safety; Oocyte cryopreservation; methods; pregnancy outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24794316     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  19 in total

1.  ART results with frozen oocytes: data from the Italian ART registry (2005-2013).

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele P E Levi-Setti; Andrea Borini; Pasquale Patrizio; Simone Bolli; Vincenzo Vigiliano; Roberto De Luca; Giulia Scaravelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Ho; Irene Woo; Kristin Louie; Wael Salem; Sami I Jabara; Kristin A Bendikson; Richard J Paulson; Karine Chung
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Freeze/thaw stress induces organelle remodeling and membrane recycling in cryopreserved human mature oocytes.

Authors:  Stefania Annarita Nottola; Elena Albani; Giovanni Coticchio; Maria Grazia Palmerini; Caterina Lorenzo; Giulia Scaravelli; Andrea Borini; Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Guido Macchiarelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Fertility preservation for non-medical reasons: controversial, but increasingly common.

Authors:  Michael von Wolff; Ariane Germeyer; Frank Nawroth
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Effects of vitrification and cryostorage duration on single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of vitrified-thawed human metaphase II oocytes.

Authors:  Ying Huo; Peng Yuan; Qingyuan Qin; Zhiqiang Yan; Liying Yan; Ping Liu; Rong Li; Jie Yan; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Fine morphological assessment of quality of human mature oocytes after slow freezing or vitrification with a closed device: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Veronica Bianchi; Guido Macchiarelli; Andrea Borini; Michela Lappi; Sandra Cecconi; Selenia Miglietta; Giuseppe Familiari; Stefania A Nottola
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Cancer and fertility preservation: international recommendations from an expert meeting.

Authors:  Matteo Lambertini; Lucia Del Mastro; Maria C Pescio; Claus Y Andersen; Hatem A Azim; Fedro A Peccatori; Mauro Costa; Alberto Revelli; Francesca Salvagno; Alessandra Gennari; Filippo M Ubaldi; Giovanni B La Sala; Cristofaro De Stefano; W Hamish Wallace; Ann H Partridge; Paola Anserini
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  The Human Oocyte Preservation Experience (HOPE) Registry: evaluation of cryopreservation techniques and oocyte source on outcomes.

Authors:  Zsolt Peter Nagy; Robert E Anderson; Eve C Feinberg; Brooke Hayward; Mary C Mahony
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Calcium ion regulation by BAPTA-AM and ruthenium red improved the fertilisation capacity and developmental ability of vitrified bovine oocytes.

Authors:  Na Wang; Hai-Sheng Hao; Chong-Yang Li; Ya-Han Zhao; Hao-Yu Wang; Chang-Liang Yan; Wei-Hua Du; Dong Wang; Yan Liu; Yun-Wei Pang; Hua-Bin Zhu; Xue-Ming Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  New national outcome data on fresh versus cryopreserved donor oocytes.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; Sarah K Darmon; David H Barad; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.