Literature DB >> 24794149

Clinically important changes in individual and composite measures of rheumatoid arthritis activity: thresholds applicable in clinical trials.

Michael M Ward1, Lori C Guthrie1, Maria I Alba1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Thresholds of minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) are needed to plan and interpret clinical trials. We estimated MCIIs for the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity measures of patient global assessment, pain score, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ), Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI).
METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal study, we studied 250 patients who had active RA. Disease activity measures were collected before and either 1 month (for patients treated with prednisone) or 4 months (for patients treated with disease modifying medications or biologics) after treatment escalation. Patient judgments of improvement in arthritis status were related to prospectively assessed changes in the measures. MCIIs were changes that had a specificity of 0.80 for improvement based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We used bootstrapping to provide estimates with predictive validity.
RESULTS: At baseline, the mean (±SD) DAS28-ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) was 6.16±1.2 and mean SDAI was 38.6±14.8. Improvement in overall arthritis status was reported by 167 patients (66.8%). Patients were consistent in their ratings of improvement versus no change or worsening, with receiver operating characteristic curve areas ≥0.74. MCIIs with a specificity for improvement of 0.80 were: patient global assessment -18, pain score -20, HAQ -0.375, DAS28-ESR -1.2, DAS28-CRP (C-reactive protein) -1.0, SDAI -13, and CDAI -12.
CONCLUSIONS: MCIIs for individual core set measures were larger than previous estimates. Reporting the proportion of patients who meet these MCII thresholds can improve the interpretation of clinical trials in RA. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease Activity; Outcomes research; Rheumatoid Arthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24794149      PMCID: PMC4216638          DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  48 in total

1.  Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments.

Authors:  J N Katz; M G Larson; C B Phillips; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Sensitivity to change of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and other clinical and health status measures in rheumatoid arthritis: results of short-term clinical trials and observational studies versus long-term observational studies.

Authors:  D J Hawley; F Wolfe
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1992-09

3.  What are the 'best' measurements for monitoring patients during short-term second-line therapy?

Authors:  J S Dixon; S Hayes; P D Constable; H A Bird
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-02

4.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; J Singer; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-12

5.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F C Arnett; S M Edworthy; D A Bloch; D J McShane; J F Fries; N S Cooper; L A Healey; S R Kaplan; M H Liang; H S Luthra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1988-03

7.  The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  O Hägg; P Fritzell; A Nordwall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice.

Authors:  J S Smolen; F C Breedveld; M H Schiff; J R Kalden; P Emery; G Eberl; P L van Riel; P Tugwell
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  G A Wells; P Tugwell; G R Kraag; P R Baker; J Groh; D A Redelmeier
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis.

Authors:  J F Fries; P Spitz; R G Kraines; H R Holman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1980-02
View more
  46 in total

1.  Direct and Indirect Determinants of the Patient Global Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Differences by Level of Disease Activity.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Abhijit Dasgupta
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Clinically important changes in short form 36 health survey scales for use in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: the impact of low responsiveness.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Maria I Alba
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Individual patient monitoring in daily clinical practice: a critical evaluation of minimal important change.

Authors:  Jos Hendrikx; Jaap Fransen; Wietske Kievit; Piet L C M van Riel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept in Elderly Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Christopher J Edwards; Katherine Roshak; Jack F Bukowski; Ronald Pedersen; Mazhar Thakur; Cecilia Borlenghi; Cinzia Curiale; Heather Jones; Lisa Marshall
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Orbai; Alexis Ogdie
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.670

6.  Predicting the probability of successful efficacy of a dissociated agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor from dose-response analysis.

Authors:  Daniela J Conrado; Sriram Krishnaswami; Satoshi Shoji; Sheela Kolluri; Judith Hey-Hadavi; Dorothy McCabe; Ricardo Rojo; Brinda K Tammara
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 7.  Patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Orbai; Clifton O Bingham
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.592

8.  Domain-specific transition questions demonstrated higher validity than global transition questions as anchors for clinically important improvement.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Maria Alba
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Standards of Comparison and Discordance in Rheumatoid Arthritis Global Assessments Between Patients and Clinicians.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Maria I Alba
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  Validity of adopting a Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index less than 0.5 as a target in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Ichiro Yoshii; Tatsumi Chijiwa; Naoya Sawada
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.