Literature DB >> 24793667

Combined score using clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters to predict left ventricular remodeling in patients having had cardiac resynchronization therapy six months earlier.

Anne Brunet-Bernard1, Sylvestre Maréchaux2, Laurent Fauchier3, Aurélie Guiot4, Maxime Fournet5, Amélie Reynaud6, Frédéric Schnell6, Christophe Leclercq5, Philippe Mabo5, Erwan Donal7.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a scoring system integrating clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic measurements can predict left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The derivation cohort consisted of 162 patients with heart failure implanted with a CRT device. Baseline clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic characteristics were entered into univariate and multivariate models to predict reverse remodeling as defined by a ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months (60%). Combinations of predictors were then tested under different scoring systems. A new 7-point CRT response score termed L2ANDS2: Left bundle branch block (2 points), Age >70 years, Nonischemic origin, left ventricular end-diastolic Diameter <40 mm/m(2), and Septal flash (2 points) was calculated for these patients. This score was then validated against a validation cohort of 45 patients from another academic center. A highly significant incremental predictive value was noted when septal flash was added to an initial 4-factor model including left bundle branch block (difference between area under the curve C statistics = 0.125, p <0.001). The predictive accuracy using the L2ANDS2 score was then 0.79 for the C statistic. Application of the new score to the validation cohort (71% of responders) gave a similar C statistic (0.75). A score >5 had a high positive likelihood ratio (+LR = 5.64), whereas a score <2 had a high negative likelihood ratio (-LR = 0.19). In conclusion, this L2ANDS2 score provides an easy-to-use tool for the clinician to assess the pretest probability of a patient being a CRT responder.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24793667     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

Review 1.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Relation between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block: An electro- and vectorcardiographic study.

Authors:  Jan De Pooter; Milad El Haddad; Victor Kamoen; Thomas Tibin Kallupurackal; Roland Stroobandt; Marc De Buyzere; Frank Timmermans
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Rational and design of EuroCRT: an international observational study on multi-modality imaging and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Erwan Donal; Victoria Delgado; Julien Magne; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Christophe Leclercq; Bernard Cosyns; Marta Sitges; Thor Edvardsen; Elif Sade; Ivan Stankovic; Eustachio Agricola; Maurizio Galderisi; Patrizio Lancellotti; Alfredo Hernandez; Sven Plein; Denisa Muraru; Ehud Schwammenthal; Gerhard Hindricks; Bogdan A Popescu; Gilbert Habib
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Pilot study using 3D-longitudinal strain computation in a multi-parametric approach for best selecting responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Maxime Fournet; Anne Bernard; Sylvestre Marechaux; Elena Galli; Raphael Martins; Philippe Mabo; J Claude Daubert; Christophe Leclercq; Alfredo Hernandez; Erwan Donal
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 5.  Advances in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Asif Jafferani; Miguel A Leal
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2019-06-15

6.  Validation of Three European Risk Scores to Predict Long-Term Outcomes for Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asian Population.

Authors:  Shengwen Yang; Zhimin Liu; Wenran Li; Yiran Hu; Shangyu Liu; Ran Jing; Wei Hua
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Comparing the Modified Frailty Index with conventional scores for prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy response in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Ajay Raj; Ranjit Kumar Nath; Bhagya Narayan Pandit; Ajay Pratap Singh; Neeraj Pandit; Puneet Aggarwal
Journal:  J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls       Date:  2021-06-01

8.  Echocardiography and cardiac resynchronisation therapy, friends or foes?

Authors:  W M van Everdingen; J C Schipper; J van 't Sant; K Ramdat Misier; M Meine; M J Cramer
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Impact of septal flash and left ventricle contractile reserve on positive remodeling during 1 year cardiac resynchronization therapy: the multicenter ViaCRT study.

Authors:  Zbigniew Gąsior; Edyta Płońska-Gościniak; Andrzej Kułach; Krystian Wita; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec; Hanna Szwed; Jarosław Kasprzak; Andrzej Tomaszewski; Władysław Sinkiewicz; Celina Wojciechowska
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 10.  The Role of Echocardiography in the Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Spartalis; Eleni Tzatzaki; Eleftherios Spartalis; Christos Damaskos; Antonios Athanasiou; Efthimios Livanis; Vassilis Voudris
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2017-12-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.