Literature DB >> 24793663

Decay of enteric microorganisms in biosolids-amended soil under wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivation.

K R Schwarz1, J P S Sidhu2, D L Pritchard1, Y Li3, S Toze4.   

Abstract

There is a growing need for better assessment of health risks associated with land-applied biosolids. This study investigated in-situ decay of seeded human adenovirus (HAdV), Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, and bacteriophage (MS2) in biosolids-amended soil under wheat cultivation. The biosolids seeded with microorganisms were placed in decay chambers which were then placed in the topsoil (10 cm depth) at three different sites. Sites were selected in arid wheat-growing regions of Australia with loamy-sand soil type (Western Australia) and sandy soil (South Australia). Seeded E. coli and S. enterica had a relatively short decay time (T90 = 4-56 days) in biosolids-amended soil compared to un-amended soil (T90 = 8-83 days). The decreasing soil moisture over the wheat-growing season significantly (P < 0.05) influenced survival time of both bacteria and MS2 at Western Australia (Moora) and South Australia (Mt Compass) sites, particularly in the un-amended soils. Increasing soil temperature also significantly (P < 0.05) influenced the decay of MS2 at these sites. In this study, no notable decline in HAdV numbers (PCR detectable units) was observed in both biosolids-amended and the un-amended soils at all three sites. The HAdV decay time (T90 ≥ 180 days) in biosolids-amended and un-amended soils was significantly higher than MS2 (T90 = 22-108 days). The results of this study suggest that adenovirus could survive for a longer period of time (>180 days) during the winter in biosolids-amended soil. The stability of adenovirus suggests that consideration towards biosolids amendment frequency, time, rates and appropriate withholding periods are necessary for risk mitigation. Crown
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosolids-amended soil; Human adenovirus; MS2; Pathogen decay; Salmonella enterica

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24793663     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  5 in total

1.  Comparative Assessment of BGM and PLC/PRF/5 Cell Lines for Enteric Virus Detection in Biosolids.

Authors:  Sherif Abd-Elmaksoud; Nohelia Castro-Del Campo; Charles P Gerba; Ian L Pepper; Kelly R Bright
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Different Behavior of Enteric Bacteria and Viruses in Clay and Sandy Soils after Biofertilization with Swine Digestate.

Authors:  Gislaine Fongaro; María C García-González; Marta Hernández; Airton Kunz; Célia R M Barardi; David Rodríguez-Lázaro
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Soil contamination of a public park by human and canine mastadenovirus, as well as hookworms and Toxocara spp eggs.

Authors:  Ana Karolina Antunes Eisen; Meriane Demoliner; Kelen Gras de Oliveira; Eduardo Artur Troian; Larissa Mallmann; Micheli Filippi; Paula Rodrigues de Almeida; Fernando Rosado Spilki
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 1.846

4.  Strain, Soil-Type, Irrigation Regimen, and Poultry Litter Influence Salmonella Survival and Die-off in Agricultural Soils.

Authors:  Cameron A Bardsley; Daniel L Weller; David T Ingram; Yuhuan Chen; David Oryang; Steven L Rideout; Laura K Strawn
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Study of Evolution of Microbiological Properties in Sewage Sludge-Amended Soils: A Pilot Experience.

Authors:  Natividad Miguel; Judith Sarasa; Andrea López; Jairo Gómez; Rosa Mosteo; María P Ormad
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.