Literature DB >> 24793108

Decay of genetic markers for fecal bacterial indicators and pathogens in sand from Lake Superior.

Jessica J Eichmiller1, Andrew J Borchert2, Michael J Sadowsky3, Randall E Hicks4.   

Abstract

Beach sands impact water quality and pathogen loads, however, the comparative decay of the fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli, and pathogens in freshwater sand have not been examined. In this study, freshwater sand microcosms were inoculated with sewage and pure cultures of bacterial pathogens to compare relative decay rates. The abundance of culturable Enterococcus spp. and E. coli, genetic markers for Enterococcus spp. (Entero1), total Bacteroides (AllBac), and human-specific Bacteroides (HF183), and genetic markers for the pathogens Campylobacter jejuni, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Shigella flexneri were monitored over the course of two weeks using conventional culture methods and quantitative PCR (qPCR). The effect of moisture on the persistence of culturable FIB and all genetic markers was also determined. In addition, propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment was used to examine differences in the persistence of total genetic markers and those from live cells. Decay rates were statistically compared using Tukey's test. Moisture had a significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect on the decay rates of culturable indicator bacteria, total AllBac markers, and genetic markers for FIB, Salmonella, and MRSA from live cells. At 14% sand moisture, the decay rate of total markers was slower than that of live cells for all qPCR assays, but at 28% moisture, there was no difference in the decay rates of total and live markers for any assay. AllBac and MRSA markers increased in sand at 28% moisture, probably indicating cellular growth. Overall, culturable FIB and HF183 had decay rates that were most comparable to the bacterial pathogen markers examined in this study, whereas Entero1 and AllBac rarely exhibited decay rates similar to the bacterial pathogens in this study. The choice of FIB for assessment of fecal contamination in freshwater sand should take into account the pathogen of concern and sand moisture conditions.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decay rate; Fecal indicator bacteria; Freshwater; Pathogenic bacteria; Persistence; Sand

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24793108     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  10 in total

1.  Separation of Escherichia coli from natural samples for identification of sources and microcosm inoculation.

Authors:  Marcos Tavares Carneiro; Daniel Vidal Perez; Renato Castiglia Feitosa; Julio Cesar Wasserman
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Sources and persistence of fecal indicator bacteria and Bacteroidales in sand as measured by culture-based and culture-independent methods: A case study at Santa Monica Pier, California.

Authors:  Kathryn B Mika; Karina A Chavarria; Greg Imamura; Chay Tang; Robert Torres; Jennifer A Jay
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.520

3.  Escherichia coli Capacity to Repopulate Microcosms Under Osmotic/U.V. Synergic Stress in Tropical Waters.

Authors:  Marcos T Carneiro; Daniel V Perez; Renato C Feitosa; Lorena G P Macena; Marize P Miagostovich; Julio C Wasserman
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Genes Indicative of Zoonotic and Swine Pathogens Are Persistent in Stream Water and Sediment following a Swine Manure Spill.

Authors:  Sheridan K Haack; Joseph W Duris; Dana W Kolpin; Lisa R Fogarty; Heather E Johnson; Kristen E Gibson; Michael Focazio; Kellogg J Schwab; Laura E Hubbard; William T Foreman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches.

Authors:  Danielle D Cloutier; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Human-Associated Bacteroides spp. and Human Polyomaviruses as Microbial Source Tracking Markers in Hawaii.

Authors:  Marek Kirs; Roberto A Caffaro-Filho; Mayee Wong; Valerie J Harwood; Philip Moravcik; Roger S Fujioka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Fecal Fingerprints of Enteric Pathogen Contamination in Public Environments of Kisumu, Kenya, Associated with Human Sanitation Conditions and Domestic Animals.

Authors:  Kelly K Baker; Reid Senesac; Daniel Sewell; Ananya Sen Gupta; Oliver Cumming; Jane Mumma
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Particle attached and free floating pathogens survival kinetics under typical stream and thermal spring temperature conditions.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Pramod Pandey; Yawen Zheng; Edward Robert Atwill; Gregory Pasternack
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.298

9.  Spiking a Silty-Sand Reference Soil with Bacterial DNA: Limits and Pitfalls in the Discrimination of Live and Dead Cells When Applying Ethidium Monoazide (EMA) Treatment.

Authors:  Andreas O Wagner; Nadine Praeg; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  Extended persistence of general and cattle-associated fecal indicators in marine and freshwater environment.

Authors:  Asja Korajkic; Brian R McMinn; Nicholas J Ashbolt; Mano Sivaganesan; Valerie J Harwood; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 7.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.