PURPOSE: Three bone-targeted agents (BTAs) are approved in the USA for prevention of bone complications among solid tumor patients with bone metastases: two intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BP) (pamidronate and zoledronic acid), and one subcutaneous receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) ligand inhibitor (denosumab). Using electronic medical record data from outpatient community and hospital-affiliated oncology clinics, we examined the characteristics of patients who initiated treatment with a BTA in 2011 and followed them for a maximum of 12 months. METHODS: Adult patients with bone metastasis secondary to solid tumors newly treated with a BTA during 2011 were identified from the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database. We examined patient characteristics at BTA initiation, treatment patterns, and compliance during a 12-month period. Sensitivity analyses were performed in a subgroup of patients who had confirmed 12 months of follow-up data. RESULTS: Denosumab patients (N = 1,594) were older (65 % ≥65 years vs. 60 % ≥65 years), further along in their disease progression (time since bone metastasis diagnosis: 16 % ≥2 years vs. 10 % ≥2 years), less likely to switch BTA (overall: 6 vs. 14 %; subgroup: 8 vs. 19 %), and more compliant with treatment (overall: median doses of 7 vs. 4; subgroup: 11 vs. 8) compared to IV BP patients (N = 1,975). Findings were consistent across gender, age, tumor type, naïve, and transition strata. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving denosumab and IV BPs may differ. Despite higher age and more advanced disease, patients treated with denosumab are more likely to stay on treatment and have better compliance.
PURPOSE: Three bone-targeted agents (BTAs) are approved in the USA for prevention of bone complications among solid tumorpatients with bone metastases: two intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BP) (pamidronate and zoledronic acid), and one subcutaneous receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) ligand inhibitor (denosumab). Using electronic medical record data from outpatient community and hospital-affiliated oncology clinics, we examined the characteristics of patients who initiated treatment with a BTA in 2011 and followed them for a maximum of 12 months. METHODS: Adult patients with bone metastasis secondary to solid tumors newly treated with a BTA during 2011 were identified from the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database. We examined patient characteristics at BTA initiation, treatment patterns, and compliance during a 12-month period. Sensitivity analyses were performed in a subgroup of patients who had confirmed 12 months of follow-up data. RESULTS:Denosumabpatients (N = 1,594) were older (65 % ≥65 years vs. 60 % ≥65 years), further along in their disease progression (time since bone metastasis diagnosis: 16 % ≥2 years vs. 10 % ≥2 years), less likely to switch BTA (overall: 6 vs. 14 %; subgroup: 8 vs. 19 %), and more compliant with treatment (overall: median doses of 7 vs. 4; subgroup: 11 vs. 8) compared to IV BPpatients (N = 1,975). Findings were consistent across gender, age, tumor type, naïve, and transition strata. CONCLUSIONS:Patients receiving denosumab and IV BPs may differ. Despite higher age and more advanced disease, patients treated with denosumab are more likely to stay on treatment and have better compliance.
Authors: David H Henry; Luis Costa; Francois Goldwasser; Vera Hirsh; Vania Hungria; Jana Prausova; Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Harm Sleeboom; Andrew Spencer; Saroj Vadhan-Raj; Roger von Moos; Wolfgang Willenbacher; Penella J Woll; Jianming Wang; Qi Jiang; Susie Jun; Roger Dansey; Howard Yeh Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mellissa Yong; Annette Östergaard Jensen; Jacob Bonde Jacobsen; Mette Nørgaard; Jon P Fryzek; Henrik Toft Sørensen Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-04-02 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Lee S Rosen; David Gordon; N Simon Tchekmedyian; Ronald Yanagihara; Vera Hirsh; Maciej Krzakowski; Marek Pawlicki; Paul De Souza; Ming Zheng; Gladys Urbanowitz; Dirk Reitsma; John Seaman Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kevin P Weinfurt; Liana D Castel; Yun Li; Justin W Timbie; G Alastair Glendenning; Kevin A Schulman Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Edmund C Lau; Fionna S Mowat; Michael A Kelsh; Jason C Legg; Nicole M Engel-Nitz; Heather N Watson; Helen L Collins; Robert J Nordyke; Joanna L Whyte Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Benoit Cadieux; Robert Coleman; Pegah Jafarinasabian; Allan Lipton; Robert Z Orlowski; Fred Saad; Giorgio V Scagliotti; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Alison Stopeck Journal: J Bone Oncol Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 4.072
Authors: Rohini K Hernandez; Avanti Adhia; Sally W Wade; Emily O'Connor; Jorge Arellano; Kevin Francis; Hasmik Alvrtsyan; Ryan P Million; Alexander Liede Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Ingo Diel; Sonja Ansorge; David Hohmann; Christina Giannopoulou; Daniela Niepel; Michele Intorcia Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 3.603