Literature DB >> 24789499

Patients with bone metastases from solid tumors initiating treatment with a bone-targeted agent in 2011: a descriptive analysis using oncology clinic data in the US.

Rohini K Hernandez1, Jane Quigley, Melissa Pirolli, David Quach, Kristina S Chen, Jorge Arellano, Alexander Liede.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Three bone-targeted agents (BTAs) are approved in the USA for prevention of bone complications among solid tumor patients with bone metastases: two intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BP) (pamidronate and zoledronic acid), and one subcutaneous receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) ligand inhibitor (denosumab). Using electronic medical record data from outpatient community and hospital-affiliated oncology clinics, we examined the characteristics of patients who initiated treatment with a BTA in 2011 and followed them for a maximum of 12 months.
METHODS: Adult patients with bone metastasis secondary to solid tumors newly treated with a BTA during 2011 were identified from the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database. We examined patient characteristics at BTA initiation, treatment patterns, and compliance during a 12-month period. Sensitivity analyses were performed in a subgroup of patients who had confirmed 12 months of follow-up data.
RESULTS: Denosumab patients (N = 1,594) were older (65 % ≥65 years vs. 60 % ≥65 years), further along in their disease progression (time since bone metastasis diagnosis: 16 % ≥2 years vs. 10 % ≥2 years), less likely to switch BTA (overall: 6 vs. 14 %; subgroup: 8 vs. 19 %), and more compliant with treatment (overall: median doses of 7 vs. 4; subgroup: 11 vs. 8) compared to IV BP patients (N = 1,975). Findings were consistent across gender, age, tumor type, naïve, and transition strata.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving denosumab and IV BPs may differ. Despite higher age and more advanced disease, patients treated with denosumab are more likely to stay on treatment and have better compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24789499     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2251-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  24 in total

1.  Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma.

Authors:  David H Henry; Luis Costa; Francois Goldwasser; Vera Hirsh; Vania Hungria; Jana Prausova; Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Harm Sleeboom; Andrew Spencer; Saroj Vadhan-Raj; Roger von Moos; Wolfgang Willenbacher; Penella J Woll; Jianming Wang; Qi Jiang; Susie Jun; Roger Dansey; Howard Yeh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Radiopharmaceuticals: when and how to use them to treat metastatic bone pain.

Authors:  Fabio M Paes; Vinicius Ernani; Peter Hosein; Aldo N Serafini
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec

3.  Survival in breast cancer patients with bone metastases and skeletal-related events: a population-based cohort study in Denmark (1999-2007).

Authors:  Mellissa Yong; Annette Östergaard Jensen; Jacob Bonde Jacobsen; Mette Nørgaard; Jon P Fryzek; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care.

Authors:  Peter B Jensen; Lars J Jensen; Søren Brunak
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors: a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Lee S Rosen; David Gordon; N Simon Tchekmedyian; Ronald Yanagihara; Vera Hirsh; Maciej Krzakowski; Marek Pawlicki; Paul De Souza; Ming Zheng; Gladys Urbanowitz; Dirk Reitsma; John Seaman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Economic burden of metastatic bone disease in the U.S.

Authors:  Kathy L Schulman; Joseph Kohles
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Health-related quality of life among patients with breast cancer receiving zoledronic acid or pamidronate disodium for metastatic bone lesions.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Liana D Castel; Yun Li; Justin W Timbie; G Alastair Glendenning; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  Skeletal complications of malignancy.

Authors:  R E Coleman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Reducing the burden of bone metastases: current concepts and treatment options.

Authors:  Roger von Moos; Cora Sternberg; Jean-Jacques Body; Carsten Bokemeyer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Use of electronic medical records (EMR) for oncology outcomes research: assessing the comparability of EMR information to patient registry and health claims data.

Authors:  Edmund C Lau; Fionna S Mowat; Michael A Kelsh; Jason C Legg; Nicole M Engel-Nitz; Heather N Watson; Helen L Collins; Robert J Nordyke; Joanna L Whyte
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.790

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparative Treatment Persistence with Bone-Targeting Agents Among Asian Patients with Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors: A Multinational Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chin-Yao Shen; Philip Chun-Ming Au; Yeon-Hee Baek; Ching-Lung Cheung; Wei-Pang Chung; Ju Hwan Kim; Nora J Kleinman; Tai-Chung Lam; Tzu-Chi Liao; Tzu-Chieh Lin; Ju-Young Shin; Chor-Wing Sing; Ian Chi Kei Wong; Edward Chia-Cheng Lai
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.807

2.  Longitudinal patterns of bone-targeted agent use among patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States.

Authors:  Yi Qian; Debajyoti Bhowmik; Nandita Kachru; Rohini K Hernandez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Experience with denosumab (XGEVA®) for prevention of skeletal-related events in the 10 years after approval.

Authors:  Benoit Cadieux; Robert Coleman; Pegah Jafarinasabian; Allan Lipton; Robert Z Orlowski; Fred Saad; Giorgio V Scagliotti; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Alison Stopeck
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.072

4.  Prevalence of bone metastases and bone-targeting agent use among solid tumor patients in the United States.

Authors:  Rohini K Hernandez; Avanti Adhia; Sally W Wade; Emily O'Connor; Jorge Arellano; Kevin Francis; Hasmik Alvrtsyan; Ryan P Million; Alexander Liede
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Real-world use of denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with solid tumours and bone metastases in Germany.

Authors:  Ingo Diel; Sonja Ansorge; David Hohmann; Christina Giannopoulou; Daniela Niepel; Michele Intorcia
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.603

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.