BACKGROUND: Antimalarial treatment strategies have changed much in the last 15 years, resulting in an increased variety of medicines available. Active pharmacovigilance methods are important for continued safety surveillance of these medicines, particularly in environments in which there is variability in treatments prescribed and limited confirmatory diagnostic capacity as well as limited ability of spontaneous reporting pharmacovigilance systems to generate much needed safety information quickly and efficiently. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to use the cohort-event monitoring (CEM) technique to gather drug utilization and adverse event data for patients prescribed antimalarial medicines in an outpatient setting. METHODS: The characteristics of a large urban African cohort of outpatients (n = 2,831) receiving antimalarial medications are described. The cohort was actively surveyed over the subsequent week to record adverse events, using follow-up phone calls, paper reports, and/or voluntary return clinic visits. Adverse events reported in the cohort were analysed overall and by clinically relevant age and medication groupings. RESULTS: At least one event was reported in 29.4 % of patients. Adverse events were more likely to be reported in subjects older than 12 years of age, and by patients prescribed an artesunate-amodiaquine combination. A range of adverse events were reported, the most frequent higher level terms being asthenic conditions (10.1 % of total cohort), neurological signs and symptoms (4.5 %), headaches (3.1 %), appetite disorders (2.1 %), and disturbances in consciousness (1.6 %). There were three reports of possible extrapyramidal events (two cases of tremor "hand and back shaking all over" and one case of tongue protrusion), which may appear to be related to combinations including amodiaquine and an artemisinin. CONCLUSION: The CEM methodology is a useful tool for monitoring the safety of widely available and utilized medicines, particularly in an urban environment where spontaneous reporting yields poor results and where the availability of various regimens and high levels of medicine usage can give valuable 'real-life' safety data. The types and frequencies of events reported reflected the types of events expected in patients prescribed antimalarials and nearly all events reported are listed in the summary of product characteristics of the medicines involved.
BACKGROUND: Antimalarial treatment strategies have changed much in the last 15 years, resulting in an increased variety of medicines available. Active pharmacovigilance methods are important for continued safety surveillance of these medicines, particularly in environments in which there is variability in treatments prescribed and limited confirmatory diagnostic capacity as well as limited ability of spontaneous reporting pharmacovigilance systems to generate much needed safety information quickly and efficiently. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to use the cohort-event monitoring (CEM) technique to gather drug utilization and adverse event data for patients prescribed antimalarial medicines in an outpatient setting. METHODS: The characteristics of a large urban African cohort of outpatients (n = 2,831) receiving antimalarial medications are described. The cohort was actively surveyed over the subsequent week to record adverse events, using follow-up phone calls, paper reports, and/or voluntary return clinic visits. Adverse events reported in the cohort were analysed overall and by clinically relevant age and medication groupings. RESULTS: At least one event was reported in 29.4 % of patients. Adverse events were more likely to be reported in subjects older than 12 years of age, and by patients prescribed an artesunate-amodiaquine combination. A range of adverse events were reported, the most frequent higher level terms being asthenic conditions (10.1 % of total cohort), neurological signs and symptoms (4.5 %), headaches (3.1 %), appetite disorders (2.1 %), and disturbances in consciousness (1.6 %). There were three reports of possible extrapyramidal events (two cases of tremor "hand and back shaking all over" and one case of tongue protrusion), which may appear to be related to combinations including amodiaquine and an artemisinin. CONCLUSION: The CEM methodology is a useful tool for monitoring the safety of widely available and utilized medicines, particularly in an urban environment where spontaneous reporting yields poor results and where the availability of various regimens and high levels of medicine usage can give valuable 'real-life' safety data. The types and frequencies of events reported reflected the types of events expected in patients prescribed antimalarials and nearly all events reported are listed in the summary of product characteristics of the medicines involved.
Authors: N J White; F Nosten; S Looareesuwan; W M Watkins; K Marsh; R W Snow; G Kokwaro; J Ouma; T T Hien; M E Molyneux; T E Taylor; C I Newbold; T K Ruebush; M Danis; B M Greenwood; R M Anderson; P Olliaro Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-06-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Alexander N O Dodoo; Lorna Renner; Adrianus C van Grootheest; Jerry Labadie; Kwadwo O Antwi-Agyei; Selasie Hayibor; Johannes Addison; Victoria Pappoe; Augustina Appiah-Danquah Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2007 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Andreas Mårtensson; Johan Strömberg; Christin Sisowath; Mwinyi I Msellem; J Pedro Gil; Scott M Montgomery; Piero Olliaro; Abdullah S Ali; Anders Björkman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2005-09-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Patrice Piola; Carole Fogg; Francis Bajunirwe; Samuel Biraro; Francesco Grandesso; Eugene Ruzagira; Joseph Babigumira; Isaac Kigozi; James Kiguli; Juliet Kyomuhendo; Laurent Ferradini; Walter Taylor; Francesco Checchi; Jean-Paul Guthmann Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Apr 23-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rita Baiden; Abraham Oduro; Tinto Halidou; Margaret Gyapong; Ali Sie; Eusebio Macete; Salim Abdulla; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Abdunoor Mulokozi; Alex Adjei; Esperanca Sevene; Guillaume Compaoré; Innocent Valea; Isaac Osei; Abena Yawson; Martin Adjuik; Raymond Akparibo; Bernhards Ogutu; Gabriel Leonard Upunda; Peter Smith; Fred Binka Journal: Malar J Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Vida Ami Kukula; Alexander A N Dodoo; Jonas Akpakli; Solomon A Narh-Bana; Christine Clerk; Alexander Adjei; Elizabeth Awini; Simon Manye; Richard Afedi Nagai; Gabriel Odonkor; Christian Nikoi; Martin Adjuik; Patricia Akweongo; Rita Baiden; Bernhards Ogutu; Fred Binka; Margaret Gyapong Journal: Malar J Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Serge-Brice Assi; Yapo Thomas Aba; Jean Claude Yavo; Abouo Franklin Nguessan; N'cho Bertin Tchiekoi; Koffi Moïse San; Emmanuel Bissagnéné; Stephan Duparc; Valérie Lameyre; Mea Antoine Tanoh Journal: Malar J Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Peter U Bassi; Adeline I Osakwe; Comfort K Ogar; Cassandra Elagbaje; Biyaya B Nwankwo; Sulayman T Balogun; Godwin N Ntadom; Ambrose O Isah Journal: Pharmacol Res Perspect Date: 2017-03-24
Authors: Helen Byomire Ndagije; Victoria Nambasa; Leonard Manirakiza; Donna Kusemererwa; Dan Kajungu; Sten Olsson; Niko Speybroeck Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Comfort Kunak Suku; Geraldine Hill; George Sabblah; Mimi Darko; George Muthuri; Edward Abwao; Jayesh Pandit; Adeline Ijeoma Osakwe; Cassandra Elagbaje; Priscilla Nyambayo; Star Khoza; Alexander N Dodoo; Shanthi Narayan Pal Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: H Hilda Ampadu; Alexander N O Dodoo; Samuel Bosomprah; Samantha Akakpo; Pierre Hugo; Helga Gardarsdottir; H G M Leufkens; Dan Kajungu; Kwaku Poku Asante Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 5.606