Lauren C Harshman1, Nils Kroeger2, Sun Young Rha3, Frede Donskov4, Lori Wood5, Srinivas K Tantravahi6, Ulka Vaishampayan7, Brian I Rini8, Jennifer Knox9, Scott North10, Scott Ernst11, Takeshi Yuasa12, Sandy Srinivas13, Sumanta Pal14, Daniel Y Heng2, Toni K Choueiri15. 1. Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA. Electronic address: LaurenC_Harshman@dfci.harvard.edu. 2. Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Yonsei Cancer Center/Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 4. Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 5. Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. 6. University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT. 7. Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI. 8. Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH. 9. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 10. Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 11. London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada. 12. The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan. 13. Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA. 14. City of Hope, Duarte, CA. 15. Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/ BACKGROUND: Approval of the mTOR inhibitors for the treatment of mRCC was based on efficacy in poor-risk patients in the first-line setting for temsirolimus and in vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor-refractory patients for everolimus. We strove to characterize temsirolimus and everolimus use and effectiveness in the first-line setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective database analysis of mRCC patients who received mTOR inhibitors as first-line targeted therapy. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to estimate the distribution of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We identified 127 mRCC patients who had received a first-line mTOR inhibitor. Temsirolimus was administered in 93 patients (73%) and everolimus in 34 patients (27%). The main reasons for choice of temsirolimus were poor-risk disease (38%), non-clear cell histology (27%), and clinical trial availability (15%), whereas clinical trial (82%) and non-clear cell histology (6%) drove everolimus selection. Of the temsirolimus and everolimus patients, 58% and 32% were poor-risk according to the International mRCC Database Consortium criteria, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 3.4 and 12.5 months and 4.8 and 15.9 months with temsirolimus and everolimus, respectively. Although limited by small numbers, this study characterizes a real-world, international experience with the use of mTOR inhibition in treatment-naive mRCC patients. CONCLUSION: Poor-risk RCC, non-clear cell histology, and clinical trials were the predominant reasons for mTOR inhibitor selection in the front-line setting. Because of the different patient populations in which they were administered, direct comparisons of the front-line efficacy of temsirolimus and everolimus cannot be made.
INTRODUCTION/ BACKGROUND: Approval of the mTOR inhibitors for the treatment of mRCC was based on efficacy in poor-risk patients in the first-line setting for temsirolimus and in vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor-refractory patients for everolimus. We strove to characterize temsirolimus and everolimus use and effectiveness in the first-line setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective database analysis of mRCC patients who received mTOR inhibitors as first-line targeted therapy. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to estimate the distribution of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We identified 127 mRCC patients who had received a first-line mTOR inhibitor. Temsirolimus was administered in 93 patients (73%) and everolimus in 34 patients (27%). The main reasons for choice of temsirolimus were poor-risk disease (38%), non-clear cell histology (27%), and clinical trial availability (15%), whereas clinical trial (82%) and non-clear cell histology (6%) drove everolimus selection. Of the temsirolimus and everolimuspatients, 58% and 32% were poor-risk according to the International mRCC Database Consortium criteria, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 3.4 and 12.5 months and 4.8 and 15.9 months with temsirolimus and everolimus, respectively. Although limited by small numbers, this study characterizes a real-world, international experience with the use of mTOR inhibition in treatment-naive mRCC patients. CONCLUSION: Poor-risk RCC, non-clear cell histology, and clinical trials were the predominant reasons for mTOR inhibitor selection in the front-line setting. Because of the different patient populations in which they were administered, direct comparisons of the front-line efficacy of temsirolimus and everolimus cannot be made.
Authors: Martin E Gore; Cezary Szczylik; Camillo Porta; Sergio Bracarda; Georg A Bjarnason; Stéphane Oudard; Subramanian Hariharan; Se-Hoon Lee; John Haanen; Daniel Castellano; Eduard Vrdoljak; Patrick Schöffski; Paul Mainwaring; Alejandra Nieto; Jinyu Yuan; Ronald Bukowski Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Staehler; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Sibyl Anderson; Gloria Hofilena; Minghua Shan; Carol Pena; Chetan Lathia; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Janice P Dutcher; Paul de Souza; David McDermott; Robert A Figlin; Anna Berkenblit; Alexandra Thiele; Mizue Krygowski; Andrew Strahs; Jay Feingold; Gary Hudes Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Roberto Pili; Georg A Bjarnason; Xavier Garcia-del-Muro; Jeffrey A Sosman; Ewa Solska; George Wilding; John A Thompson; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Xin Huang; Robert A Figlin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Bernard Escudier; Stéphane Oudard; Thomas E Hutson; Camillo Porta; Sergio Bracarda; Viktor Grünwald; John A Thompson; Robert A Figlin; Norbert Hollaender; Gladys Urbanowitz; William J Berg; Andrea Kay; David Lebwohl; Alain Ravaud Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sherrie L Aspinall; Xinhua Zhao; Mark C Geraci; Chester B Good; Francesca E Cunningham; Bernadette B Heron; Daniel Becker; Steve Lee; Vinay Prasad Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 4.452