Literature DB >> 24787570

A comparative effectiveness analysis of visual field outcomes after projected glaucoma screening using SD-OCT in African American communities.

Dana M Blumberg1, Reena Vaswani1, Eva Nong2, Lama Al-Aswad1, George A Cioffi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact on visual function of community glaucoma screening in an African American population using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
METHODS: Using a Monte Carlo microsimulation model with a 10-year time horizon, we analyzed the efficacy of SD-OCT screening on visual field outcomes in a population of African Americans who are not otherwise seeking office-based care. Outcomes included classification of visual field severity, quality-adjusted life years, and direct health care costs.
RESULTS: Assuming a 60% follow-up rate, screening decreased the prevalence of undiagnosed glaucoma from 75% to 38%, and decreased the prevalence of severe visual field loss in patients with glaucoma from 29.1% to 23.9%. Conversely, screening increased the prevalence of mild visual field loss in patients with glaucoma from 9.2% to 18.7%. From initial screening through confirmatory eye examination, the screening program ("screen only") cost $98 per screened individual, and $2561 per new diagnosis of glaucoma. When considering the costs of initial screening though the resultant treatment, the screening program ("screen and treat") had an average annual cost of $79 and $2138, respectively, over a 10-year time period. The cost of one quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained by screening, including management and treatment, in comparison with opportunistic case finding, ranged from $46,416 to $67,813.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that community SD-OCT screening in an African American population will minimize glaucoma-related visual morbidity. Ideally, strategies to maximize treatment efficacy through improved medication adherence and improved compliance with follow-up should be identified and implemented before instituting a screening program. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov model; SD-OCT; comparative effectiveness; glaucoma; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24787570      PMCID: PMC4073998          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-14014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  35 in total

1.  Is it time to move beyond the QALY in vision research?

Authors:  Steven M Kymes
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.648

2.  Projected clinical outcomes of glaucoma screening in African American individuals.

Authors:  Joseph A Ladapo; Steven M Kymes; Jonathan A Ladapo; Veronica C Nwosu; Louis R Pasquale
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03

3.  Community screening for eye disease by laypersons: the Hoffberger program.

Authors:  Harry A Quigley; Chan Kee Park; Patricia A Tracey; Irvin P Pollack
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael A Kass; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

5.  Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population of older Americans: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study.

Authors:  B Muñoz; S K West; G S Rubin; O D Schein; H A Quigley; S B Bressler; K Bandeen-Roche
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-06

6.  Progression of visual field loss in untreated glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects in St. Lucia, West Indies.

Authors:  M Roy Wilson; Omofolasade Kosoko; Claude L Cowan; Pamela A Sample; Chris A Johnson; Gleb Haynatzki; Cheryl Enger; David Crandall
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Rohit Varma; Mei Ying-Lai; Brian A Francis; Betsy Bao-Thu Nguyen; Jennifer Deneen; M Roy Wilson; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial.

Authors:  Anders Heijl; M Cristina Leske; Bo Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; Boel Bengtsson; Mohamed Hussein
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10

9.  Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial.

Authors:  M Cristina Leske; Anders Heijl; Mohamed Hussein; Bo Bengtsson; Leslie Hyman; Eugene Komaroff
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01

10.  Performance of time-domain and spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography for glaucoma screening.

Authors:  Boel Bengtsson; Sabina Andersson; Anders Heijl
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.761

View more
  10 in total

1.  Why Do People (Still) Go Blind from Glaucoma?

Authors:  Remo Susanna; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  The Association Between Clinical Features Seen on Fundus Photographs and Glaucomatous Damage Detected on Visual Fields and Optical Coherence Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Paula A Alhadeff; Carlos G De Moraes; Monica Chen; Ali S Raza; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Gaps in Glaucoma care: A systematic review of monoscopic disc photos to screen for glaucoma.

Authors:  Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Angela J Verkade; Gale Oren; Alan L Robin
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Alabama Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health Through Telemedicine (AL-SIGHT): Study Design and Methodology.

Authors:  Lindsay A Rhodes; Shilpa Register; Irfan Asif; Gerald McGwin; Jinan Saaddine; Van Thi Ha Nghiem; Cynthia Owsley; Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Cost and detection rate of glaucoma screening with imaging devices in a primary care center.

Authors:  Alfonso Anton; Monica Fallon; Francesc Cots; María A Sebastian; Antonio Morilla-Grasa; Sergi Mojal; Xavier Castells
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-16

6.  Comparison of glaucoma patients referred by glaucoma screening versus referral from primary eye clinic.

Authors:  Yong Ju Song; Yong Woo Kim; Ki Ho Park; Young Kook Kim; Hyuk Jin Choi; Jin Wook Jeoung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  An evidence-based approach to the routine use of optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Angelica Ly; Jack Phu; Paula Katalinic; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  How to Stop People from Going Blind from Glaucoma Using Early Cataract Surgery/Refractive Lensectomy and Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Laroche; Melanie Scheive
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 9.  Deep learning in glaucoma with optical coherence tomography: a review.

Authors:  An Ran Ran; Clement C Tham; Poemen P Chan; Ching-Yu Cheng; Yih-Chung Tham; Tyler Hyungtaek Rim; Carol Y Cheung
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Feeling the pressure: a cross-sectional study exploring feasibility of a healthcare Pop-Up for intraocular pressure measurements in shopping centres in England.

Authors:  Laura A Edwards; Deanna J Taylor; Peter Campbell; Rakhee Shah; David F Edgar; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.