Alaa Kamnaksh1, Matthew D Budde2, Erzsebet Kovesdi3, Joseph B Long4, Joseph A Frank5, Denes V Agoston6. 1. 1] Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Genetics, The Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814 [2] Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814. 2. 1] Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Room B1N256 MSC 1074, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 [2]. 3. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420. 4. Blast-Induced Neurotrauma Branch, Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 503 Robert Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910. 5. Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Room B1N256 MSC 1074, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. 6. Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Genetics, The Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814.
Abstract
Mild blast-induced traumatic brain injury (mbTBI) poses special diagnostic challenges due to its overlapping symptomatology with other neuropsychiatric conditions and the lack of objective outcome measures. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can potentially provide clinically relevant information toward a differential diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to determine if single and repeated (5 total; administered on consecutive days) mild blast overpressure exposure results in detectable structural changes in the brain, especially in the hippocampus. Fixed rat brains were analyzed by ex vivo DTI at 2 h and 42 days after blast (or sham) exposure(s). An anatomy-based region of interest analysis revealed significant interactions in axial and radial diffusivity in a number of subcortical structures at 2 h only. Differences between single- and multiple-injured rats were largely in the thalamus but not the hippocampus. Our findings demonstrate the value and the limitations of DTI in providing a better understanding of mbTBI pathobiology.
Mild blast-induced traumatic brain injury (mbTBI) poses special diagnostic challenges due to its overlapping symptomatology with other neuropsychiatric conditions and the lack of objective outcome measures. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can potentially provide clinically relevant information toward a differential diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to determine if single and repeated (5 total; administered on consecutive days) mild blast overpressure exposure results in detectable structural changes in the brain, especially in the hippocampus. Fixed rat brains were analyzed by ex vivo DTI at 2 h and 42 days after blast (or sham) exposure(s). An anatomy-based region of interest analysis revealed significant interactions in axial and radial diffusivity in a number of subcortical structures at 2 h only. Differences between single- and multiple-injured rats were largely in the thalamus but not the hippocampus. Our findings demonstrate the value and the limitations of DTI in providing a better understanding of mbTBI pathobiology.
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) continues to be the least understood form of traumatic
brain injury (TBI) despite its high incidence and substantial toll on patients and health care
systems1. In the military, mTBIs are mostly caused by the exposure to low
levels of blast from improvised explosive devices resulting in mild blast-induced TBI
(mbTBI)234. The diagnosis of mbTBI currently relies on subjective
assessments and self-reports of symptoms such as disorientation, altered states of
consciousness, headaches, and emotional and cognitive dysfunction—all of which are involved in
post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)5. Because of the mild and transient
nature of symptoms that follow mbTBI, soldiers typically return to duty and are frequently
re-exposed to additional mild blasts. Studies have suggested that repeated mbTBI is a risk
factor for developing late onset neurodegenerative conditions such as chronic traumatic
encephalopathy (CTE)6.Objective outcome measures can provide especially valuable, clinically relevant information
in a non-/minimally invasive and repeatable manner. Various modalities of magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI), including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), have been utilized in clinical
settings following TBI78910. However, only a limited number of clinical
studies included readouts at several post-injury time points in Veterans11121314151617. DTI's sensitivity relative to conventional imaging
tools has prompted its recent use in experimental mTBI181920 with a few
rodent blast-induced TBI (bTBI) studies21222324. These studies identified
a number of brain regions, including the hippocampus and the cerebellum, as being affected in
mbTBI25. Injury-induced changes in serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and tissue
protein biomarker levels have also been extensively investigated in both clinical and
experimental TBI262728. Together, imaging and molecular biomarkers would
enable the monitoring of pathological processes over time and allow for more direct
comparisons between experimental findings and clinical TBI cases.The full potential and limitations of using imaging and molecular biomarkers in the diagnosis
and monitoring of TBIs, especially mTBIs, are currently unknown due to a substantial gap
between clinical and experimental findings and their translatability29.
Furthermore, our understanding of how structural changes relate to cellular, molecular, and
functional changes in TBI is very limited. Our previous works using the rodent model of single
and repeated mbTBI recapitulated some of the behavioral changes that are observed in human
bTBI30. Using histologic and proteomic analyses of functionally relevant
brain regions and peripheral blood, we identified several pathologies at different post-injury
time points. These include neuronal and glial damage and/or death, axonal damage, metabolic
and vascular changes, and inflammation. Additionally, we identified several pathologies that
include neuronal and glial damage and/or death, axonal damage, metabolic and vascular changes,
and inflammation at different post-injury time points using histologic and proteomic analyses
of functionally relevant brain regions and peripheral blood313233. In this
preliminary imaging study, we aimed to determine if the same exposure to single and repeated
mild blast overpressure that resulted in the abovementioned changes also induced structural
changes that are detectable by DTI.
Results
We selected two of our previously tested post-injury termination time points, 2 h and 42
days, for the DTI analyses to mimic early and delayed clinical interventions. A manual
region of interest (ROI) analysis was first used to assess hippocampal volume and fractional
anisotropy (FA) in the hippocampus as shown in Fig. 1a. No significant
differences were identified in hippocampal volume or FA values at either time point (Fig. 2). An anatomically defined ROI analysis was then performed as shown
in Fig. 1b–d. In rats terminated ~2 h after blast (or sham)
exposure(s), no brain regions had a significant interaction for FA. However, axial
diffusivity (AD) and radial diffusivity (RD) had significant interactions in regions of the
stria terminalis, thalamic subregions, and the cerebellum. Post hoc analysis revealed that
the single-injured (SI) and multiple-injured (MI) groups were significantly different from
one another largely in the thalamus and thalamic nuclei. Regions exhibiting significant
blast event-related differences (i.e., single vs. repeated blast) are shown in Fig. 3 and Table 1; mean DTI values for these
regions are provided in Fig. 4. No brain regions exhibited significant
ROI changes in rats terminated 42 days after blast (or sham) exposure(s).
Figure 1
MRI data analysis.
(a) A T2-weighted image from a single subject with the hippocampus manually outlined in
red. (b) A mean directionally encoded color image. (c) Map of FA derived from DTI of all
spatially registered brains (every second slice is shown). (d) The registered anatomical
ROIs derived from the atlas overlaid on the FA map for visualization.
Figure 2
Volumetric and DTI measures in the hippocampus.
(a) Hippocampal volume (cm3) of sham (SS, single sham; MS, multiple
sham) and injured (SI, single-injured; MI, multiple-injured) rats terminated at 2 h and
45 days after blast (or sham) exposure(s). (b) Fractional anisotropy (FA) in the
hippocampi of rats at the same time points. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Figure 3
Brain regions exhibiting significant ROI changes.
Regions with a significant Blast x No. of Events interaction were first identified;
those with significant differences between single-injured and multiple-injured rats
(corrected for multiple comparisons) are shown in red.
Table 1
Brain regions exhibiting significant blast event-related effects at 2 h
post-injury
Statistically significant differences between SI and MI rats are indicated in
boldface.
Figure 4
Mean DTI values at the two time points.
Data were extracted from each subject as a single value from the ROIs showing
significance in the anatomical ROI analysis. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM for
each experimental group (SS, single sham; SI, single-injured; MS, multiple sham; MI,
multiple-injured).
Discussion
Elucidating the role of repeated mbTBI in the development of neurodegenerative conditions
is a pressing issue for the military health care system. To that end, a better understanding
of mbTBI pathobiology, the period of cerebral vulnerability between insults, and the
synergistic effect of repeated injury is critical. In conducting a series of studies
comparing single and repeated mild blast injury (5 overpressure exposures administered on
consecutive days), we aimed to assess the extent of the damage accumulation in mbTBI (i.e.,
the cumulative effect of the injury) at different post-injury time points. Of particular
interest to us is correlating cellular and molecular level changes with structural and
neurocognitive changes toward a definitive diagnosis for mbTBI. The objective of this study
was to determine if the exposure to single and repeated mild blast overpressure, which
resulted in significant functional, cellular, and molecular changes, also induced structural
changes that are detectable by ex vivo DTI.Based on a number of bTBI studies that implicate the hippocampus in the development of
neurobehavioral symptoms, we expected to detect injury-induced structural and/or volumetric
changes in this region due to its involvement in TBI3435. We previously
found significantly increased numbers of apoptotic, TUNEL-positive cells in the hilus and
granular cell layer of the hippocampus as early as 2 h post-injury in both single- and
multiple-injured rats36. However, we found no significant changes in
hippocampal volume or FA in the hippocampus in our current study. This discrepancy may be
related to the current spatial resolution of DTI. Another plausible explanation is that even
though we found significantly increased rates of cell death in the hippocampus, we also
found a substantive gliotic response30313337. Such astroglial
hypertrophy can potentially compensate for the loss in volume caused by cell death.A recent ex vivo DTI rodent study has shown that the microstructure of the hippocampus can
be significantly affected in mbTBI23. Consistent with impaired cognitive
performance, FA values were significantly decreased in select brain regions of blast-exposed
rats relative to their sham controls at 4 and 30 days post-injury. The affected brain
regions included the hippocampus, thalamus, and brainstem. It is important to note, however,
that the blast model and experimental design of our and the Budde et al. study are very
different. Nonetheless, hippocampal abnormalities have been found in a number of clinical
mbTBI studies using various imaging modalities121517383940.Since no significant hippocampal changes were detected in our work, an automated,
anatomical ROI analysis without a priori assumptions of affected regions was used to examine
the brains23. Compared to a voxel by voxel approach that includes thousands
of independent statistical tests, the whole brain anatomical ROI approach reduces the number
of statistical comparisons but avoids tedious manual definition of brain regions41. The results of this analysis demonstrated significant changes that are
largely confined to midline thalamic structures and the cerebellum. Post hoc analysis
revealed that SI and MI rats were significantly different from one another in the thalamus
and thalamic nuclei. Previous bTBI studies also found changes in the thalamus using DTI23 and histological methods42. Thalamus-mediated functions account
for a significant number of the most frequently reported neurobehavioral symptoms in
clinical mbTBI. Among the leading complaints are sleep and emotional disturbances as well as
altered sensory sensitivities, both auditory and visual14.Cerebellar abnormalities have been found in most humanbTBI imaging studies12151643 and in a recent rodent bTBI study24. These findings
illustrate the region-specific vulnerability of the brain to different types of physical
insults—an important albeit poorly understood issue in TBI. The cerebellum's susceptibility
to injury maybe due to its anatomy; it is located in a relatively small sub-compartment of
the skull and the ratio between cerebellar white and grey matters is different from that in
the cerebrum. Primary blast injury mainly exerts damage at the interface of biological
materials with differing physiochemical properties (e.g., grey and white matter). Indeed,
white matter damage—including cerebellar white matter—has been found in virtually all humanbTBI imaging studies. Functionally, the cerebellum is involved in certain cognitive and
learning functions, hence the detected changes are consistent with clinically observed
abnormalities4445.Among the other affected brain structures is the stria terminalis, which serves as a major
relay site within the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis46. Similar changes
were also found in the olfactory tubercule, including the islands of Calleja. The olfactory
tubercule has been shown to play a role in behavioral response as it is interconnected with
several brain regions with sensory and arousal/reward functions47. In fact,
injury to the islands as a result of restricted blood flow has been linked to a number of
behavioral and emotional responses such as amnesia and changes in personality—behavioral
changes that are not possible to assess in animal models.A critical limitation toward better understanding human mbTBI is inherent variability as
well as the unknown biophysical forces that are experienced during injury. Additionally,
most existing DTI studies of veterans have been performed years after the injury. Animal
models of mbTBI allow for direct testing of the many effects of blast wave characteristics
under carefully controlled conditions48. However, we currently have no clear
understanding of how human years (physiologically and pathologically speaking) translate
into rat months (or weeks). Furthermore, the lack of a consensus regarding a high fidelity
experimental bTBI model—as demonstrated by the imaging findings obtained using various blast
models—is a major impediment to studying the physical and biological effects of primary
blast injury.Another pressing issue is how DTI findings in mbTBI (or any other neurological disorder)
relate to changes detectable by proteomics or histology. We emphasize this point because
although rats terminated at 42 days did not exhibit significant ROI changes as measured by
DTI, proteomic analyses of plasma at the same time point showed significant and persistent
molecular pathologies in SI as well as MI rats3649. These include
inflammation, metabolic and vascular changes, neuronal and glial cell damage and/or death,
and axonal damage.A technical limitation of our study is the use of fixed tissues in ex vivo DTI, mainly due
to altered diffusivity of water molecules. Nonetheless, previous studies have demonstrated
that ex vivo DTI provides valuable structural information that correlates with in vivo
changes albeit to a varying extent. This may partially account for the poor correlation
between cellular changes obtained by conventional histology and volumetric/DTI measures in
the hippocampus. It should be noted that animal in vivo imaging has its own issues with
scanning times (and corresponding anesthesia times), image acquisition protocols, and motion
artifacts being the major ones.Despite the increased attention in recent years on blast as a mechanism of mTBI, the
subject of how blast waves affect the brain along with diagnosing mbTBI are still a matter
of considerable debate. The abovementioned caveats underline the importance of combining
objective and clinically relevant outcome measures in experimental TBI to validate and
correlate findings, to enable more direct comparisons of pathologies observed in animal and
in clinical TBI research, and to enable the development of sensitive and specific
diagnostics for mbTBI29.
Methods
Animals and housing conditions
A total of 60 male Sprague Dawley rats (weight at arrival: 245–265 g) (Charles River
Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were used in the original experiments3649.
All animals were housed in standard rat cages with a built-in filter in a reverse 12-h
light 12-h dark cycle with food and waterad lib. Animals were handled according to
protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Uniformed
Services University (USU; Bethesda, MD).
Experimental groups and manipulations
All animals underwent a 5 day acclimation and handling period and were later assigned to
the following groups: naïve, single sham (SS), single-injured (SI), multiple sham (MS),
and multiple-injured (MI) as described earlier3649. Rat numbers in the
early and late termination groups were: (N = 30; naïve = 3, SS = 6, SI = 7, MS = 6,
MI = 8) and (N = 30; naïve = 3, SS = 6, SI = 7, MS = 6, MI = 8), respectively.
Naïve rats were kept in the animal facility at USU without any manipulation for the
duration of the studies. SS rats were transported once from USU to Walter Reed Army
Institute of Research (Silver Spring, MD) and anesthetized in an induction chamber with a
4% isoflurane (Forane; Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL) in air mixture
delivered at 2 L/min for 6 min. MS rats were similarly transported and anesthetized once
per day for 5 consecutive days. SI and MI rats underwent the same procedures as their
respective sham controls in addition to receiving a single or multiple (5 total) mild
blast exposure(s)3649.
Injury conditions
Anesthetized rats in chest protection (weight at injury: 300–330 g) were placed in the
shock tube holder in a transverse prone position with the right side facing the direction
of the membrane and the incidence of the blast waves. Blast overpressure was generated
using a compressed air-driven shock tube yielding a single blast overpressure wave
(average peak total pressure: ~137 kPa at the animal level) to produce a mild injury as
described in detail313750. Following blast (or equivalent time spent
anesthetized as a sham), animals were moved to an adjacent bench top for observation and
then transported back to the USU animal facility at the conclusion of each injury day.
Preparation of specimens for imaging
A subset of animals from each experiment [(2 h termination: n = 11; SS = 2, SI =
3, MS = 3, MI = 3) and (42 day termination: n = 16; SS = 4, SI = 4, MS = 4, MI =
4)] was used for MRI/DTI analyses; all other animals were used for proteomics as described
earlier3649. Rats were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane inhalant
until a tail pinch produced no reflex movement, then transcardially perfused with cold
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by a 4% paraformaldehyde in 1x PBS solution. The
brains were removed and post-fixed in the same solution overnight at 4°C and then
transferred to a 1x PBS solution containing 0.1% sodium azide until scanning. No
hemorrhage or any other signs of macroscopic damage were detected in any of the
animals.
Image acquisition
Fixed brains underwent ex vivo DTI within 2 days of perfusion fixation on a Bruker 7 T
vertical bore system. Brains were immersed in susceptibility-matching fluid (Fomblin;
Solvay Solexis, Inc., West Deptford, NJ) and inserted into a radiofrequency coil 3 cm in
diameter. A three-echo diffusion-weighted spin echo sequence was employed (TR = 4 s; TE =
20 ms (first echo; 7.5 ms echo spacing) to acquire diffusion-weighted images (b =
1200 s/mm2) along 30 directions51 with diffusion gradient
duration (δ) and separation (Δ) of 4 and 10 ms, respectively, along with 5 non
diffusion-weighted images52. The slice thickness was 0.5 mm with an
in-plane resolution of 0.234 mm2 and a 30 mm2 field of view
(1282 matrix). The full experiment required 6 h of continuous imaging.
DTI data was reconstructed using a linear least squares fit to derive parameter maps of
FA, AD, and RD using custom Matlab routines53.
Data analysis
The analysis of MRI data included volumetric and DTI measures in the hippocampus and an
anatomical ROI analysis of DTI data without a priori assumptions of affected regions.
Hippocampal volume and FA in the hippocampus were derived from manual segmentation of the
hippocampus on T2-weighted and FA maps, respectively, by an operator blinded to animal
conditions. For unbiased quantification of DTI measures using anatomically based ROIs, DTI
volumes from all subjects were first registered to a common space using an iterative,
tensor-based registration routine implemented in DTI-TK54. Rigid-body,
affine, and diffeomorphic (piecewise affine) methods were used in succession to
progressively improve registration accuracy, as this approach has been shown to be
superior to other routines55. The final image resolution was 120 × 120 ×
500 μm3. Anatomical ROIs were derived from a digital rat brain atlas
included as part of the Medical Image Visualization and Analysis Software (MIVA) software
package56. The regions consisted of 87 subregions of the brain initially
derived from the Paxinos Rat brain atlas57. A mask of white matter regions
derived from the atlas was registered to a mask of white matter regions derived from DTI
by thresholding the FA maps at 0.2. An FA value of 0.2 was chosen empirically since it
effectively masked the white matter tracts. It should be noted that this threshold value
was used for the registration of the ROIs, not for quantification. Registration employed a
point-set based registration metric incorporated into Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTS)
software package, including elastic warping58. The resulting overlap
demonstrated high correspondence between the DTI and atlas-based white matter structures
(Fig. 1C). The mean FA, AD, and RD within each ROI were derived
from each of the registered DTI volumes from each subject for subsequent statistical
analysis (Fig. 4).
Statistical analysis
Twenty-seven animals were used for the analyses (2 h termination, N = 11; 42 day
termination, N = 16). A mixed-effect ANOVA was first performed to identify any
significant effects of left/right (L/R) asymmetry. Since none of the brain regions
exhibited a significant Blast x No. of Events x Side (L/R) interaction, the effect of side
was collapsed for all subsequent analyses. For hippocampal volume and FA in the
hippocampus, ANOVAs followed by Tukey's HSD test were performed separately at each time
point. Subsequently, a one-way ANOVA was performed for each condition across the two time
points.For DTI, a two-way ANOVA was performed to compare the main effects of Blast x No. of
Events interaction. Regions that exhibited a significant interaction were subjected to
post-hoc analysis using a Student's t-test to compare the SI and MI groups. All
statistical tests were corrected for multiple comparisons (87 individual ROIs) by
controlling for the false discovery rate59. A Spearman correlation analysis
was used to identify brain regions significantly correlated to either the number of blast
events or the number of sham events. A corrected p value of 0.05 was considered
significant for all tests.
Author Contributions
A.K. and E.K. carried out animal studies, including the preparation of specimens for
imaging. J.L. designed and supervised blast overpressure exposures at Walter Reed. M.B.
performed and analyzed MRI/DTI measures under J.F.'s supervision at the NIH. A.K., M.B., and
D.A. wrote the main manuscript text; A.K. and M.B. generated and formatted figures 1–4 and
table 1. A.K. and D.A. reviewed the manuscript prior to submission.
Authors: Scott C Matthews; Irina A Strigo; Alan N Simmons; Ryan M O'Connell; Lindsay E Reinhardt; Suzanne A Moseley Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Lee E Goldstein; Andrew M Fisher; Chad A Tagge; Xiao-Lei Zhang; Libor Velisek; John A Sullivan; Chirag Upreti; Jonathan M Kracht; Maria Ericsson; Mark W Wojnarowicz; Cezar J Goletiani; Giorgi M Maglakelidze; Noel Casey; Juliet A Moncaster; Olga Minaeva; Robert D Moir; Christopher J Nowinski; Robert A Stern; Robert C Cantu; James Geiling; Jan K Blusztajn; Benjamin L Wolozin; Tsuneya Ikezu; Thor D Stein; Andrew E Budson; Neil W Kowall; David Chargin; Andre Sharon; Sudad Saman; Garth F Hall; William C Moss; Robin O Cleveland; Rudolph E Tanzi; Patric K Stanton; Ann C McKee Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Kevin K W Wang; Andrew K Ottens; Ming Cheng Liu; Stephen B Lewis; Colleen Meegan; Monika W Oli; Frank C Tortella; Ronald L Hayes Journal: Expert Rev Proteomics Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.940
Authors: J Rodrigo; D Alonso; M L Bentura; S Castro-Blanco; J M Encinas; A P Fernández; P Fernández-Vizarra; A Richart; M Santacana; J Serrano; A Martínez Journal: Histol Histopathol Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Nils Henninger; Kenneth M Sicard; Zhixin Li; Praveen Kulkarni; Stephan Dützmann; Christian Urbanek; Stefan Schwab; Marc Fisher Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Sook-Kyung C Kwon; Erzsebet Kovesdi; Andrea B Gyorgy; Daniel Wingo; Alaa Kamnaksh; John Walker; Joseph B Long; Denes V Agoston Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Dan Benjamini; Diego Iacono; Michal E Komlosh; Daniel P Perl; David L Brody; Peter J Basser Journal: Brain Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Aric F Logsdon; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Ryan C Turner; Xinlan Li; Chris E Adkins; Afroz S Mohammad; Jason D Huber; Charles L Rosen; Paul R Lockman Journal: Arch Neurosci Date: 2017-04-30
Authors: James S Meabon; David G Cook; Mayumi Yagi; Garth E Terry; Donna J Cross; Mark Muzi; Kathleen F Pagulayan; Aric F Logsdon; Abigail G Schindler; Vikas Ghai; Kai Wang; Shannon Fallen; Yong Zhou; Taek-Kyun Kim; Inyoul Lee; William A Banks; Erik S Carlson; Cynthia Mayer; Rebecca C Hendrickson; Murray A Raskind; Desiree A Marshall; Daniel P Perl; C Dirk Keene; Elaine R Peskind Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajja; W Brad Hubbard; Christina S Hall; Farhad Ghoddoussi; Matthew P Galloway; Pamela J VandeVord Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 4.379