Literature DB >> 24786839

Diffusion tensor imaging reveals acute subcortical changes after mild blast-induced traumatic brain injury.

Alaa Kamnaksh1, Matthew D Budde2, Erzsebet Kovesdi3, Joseph B Long4, Joseph A Frank5, Denes V Agoston6.   

Abstract

Mild blast-induced traumatic brain injury (mbTBI) poses special diagnostic challenges due to its overlapping symptomatology with other neuropsychiatric conditions and the lack of objective outcome measures. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can potentially provide clinically relevant information toward a differential diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to determine if single and repeated (5 total; administered on consecutive days) mild blast overpressure exposure results in detectable structural changes in the brain, especially in the hippocampus. Fixed rat brains were analyzed by ex vivo DTI at 2 h and 42 days after blast (or sham) exposure(s). An anatomy-based region of interest analysis revealed significant interactions in axial and radial diffusivity in a number of subcortical structures at 2 h only. Differences between single- and multiple-injured rats were largely in the thalamus but not the hippocampus. Our findings demonstrate the value and the limitations of DTI in providing a better understanding of mbTBI pathobiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24786839      PMCID: PMC4019232          DOI: 10.1038/srep04809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) continues to be the least understood form of traumatic brain injury (TBI) despite its high incidence and substantial toll on patients and health care systems1. In the military, mTBIs are mostly caused by the exposure to low levels of blast from improvised explosive devices resulting in mild blast-induced TBI (mbTBI)234. The diagnosis of mbTBI currently relies on subjective assessments and self-reports of symptoms such as disorientation, altered states of consciousness, headaches, and emotional and cognitive dysfunction—all of which are involved in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)5. Because of the mild and transient nature of symptoms that follow mbTBI, soldiers typically return to duty and are frequently re-exposed to additional mild blasts. Studies have suggested that repeated mbTBI is a risk factor for developing late onset neurodegenerative conditions such as chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE)6. Objective outcome measures can provide especially valuable, clinically relevant information in a non-/minimally invasive and repeatable manner. Various modalities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), have been utilized in clinical settings following TBI78910. However, only a limited number of clinical studies included readouts at several post-injury time points in Veterans11121314151617. DTI's sensitivity relative to conventional imaging tools has prompted its recent use in experimental mTBI181920 with a few rodent blast-induced TBI (bTBI) studies21222324. These studies identified a number of brain regions, including the hippocampus and the cerebellum, as being affected in mbTBI25. Injury-induced changes in serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and tissue protein biomarker levels have also been extensively investigated in both clinical and experimental TBI262728. Together, imaging and molecular biomarkers would enable the monitoring of pathological processes over time and allow for more direct comparisons between experimental findings and clinical TBI cases. The full potential and limitations of using imaging and molecular biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring of TBIs, especially mTBIs, are currently unknown due to a substantial gap between clinical and experimental findings and their translatability29. Furthermore, our understanding of how structural changes relate to cellular, molecular, and functional changes in TBI is very limited. Our previous works using the rodent model of single and repeated mbTBI recapitulated some of the behavioral changes that are observed in human bTBI30. Using histologic and proteomic analyses of functionally relevant brain regions and peripheral blood, we identified several pathologies at different post-injury time points. These include neuronal and glial damage and/or death, axonal damage, metabolic and vascular changes, and inflammation. Additionally, we identified several pathologies that include neuronal and glial damage and/or death, axonal damage, metabolic and vascular changes, and inflammation at different post-injury time points using histologic and proteomic analyses of functionally relevant brain regions and peripheral blood313233. In this preliminary imaging study, we aimed to determine if the same exposure to single and repeated mild blast overpressure that resulted in the abovementioned changes also induced structural changes that are detectable by DTI.

Results

We selected two of our previously tested post-injury termination time points, 2 h and 42 days, for the DTI analyses to mimic early and delayed clinical interventions. A manual region of interest (ROI) analysis was first used to assess hippocampal volume and fractional anisotropy (FA) in the hippocampus as shown in Fig. 1a. No significant differences were identified in hippocampal volume or FA values at either time point (Fig. 2). An anatomically defined ROI analysis was then performed as shown in Fig. 1b–d. In rats terminated ~2 h after blast (or sham) exposure(s), no brain regions had a significant interaction for FA. However, axial diffusivity (AD) and radial diffusivity (RD) had significant interactions in regions of the stria terminalis, thalamic subregions, and the cerebellum. Post hoc analysis revealed that the single-injured (SI) and multiple-injured (MI) groups were significantly different from one another largely in the thalamus and thalamic nuclei. Regions exhibiting significant blast event-related differences (i.e., single vs. repeated blast) are shown in Fig. 3 and Table 1; mean DTI values for these regions are provided in Fig. 4. No brain regions exhibited significant ROI changes in rats terminated 42 days after blast (or sham) exposure(s).
Figure 1

MRI data analysis.

(a) A T2-weighted image from a single subject with the hippocampus manually outlined in red. (b) A mean directionally encoded color image. (c) Map of FA derived from DTI of all spatially registered brains (every second slice is shown). (d) The registered anatomical ROIs derived from the atlas overlaid on the FA map for visualization.

Figure 2

Volumetric and DTI measures in the hippocampus.

(a) Hippocampal volume (cm3) of sham (SS, single sham; MS, multiple sham) and injured (SI, single-injured; MI, multiple-injured) rats terminated at 2 h and 45 days after blast (or sham) exposure(s). (b) Fractional anisotropy (FA) in the hippocampi of rats at the same time points. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

Figure 3

Brain regions exhibiting significant ROI changes.

Regions with a significant Blast x No. of Events interaction were first identified; those with significant differences between single-injured and multiple-injured rats (corrected for multiple comparisons) are shown in red.

Table 1

Brain regions exhibiting significant blast event-related effects at 2 h post-injury

 Fractional AnisotropyAxial DiffusivityRadial Diffusivity
 Blast x No. of Events InteractionBlast x No. of Events InteractionSI vs. MIt-TestBlast x No. of Events InteractionSI vs. MIt-Test
Brain RegionF valuep valueaF valuep valuebt valuep valuebF valuep valuebt valuep valueb
Stria Terminalis 4.550.06519.280.0176.34 0.023 11.910.0684.800.099
Posterior Hypothalamic Nucleus 1.250.29613.560.0433.780.14513.570.0484.060.189
Islands of Calleja 1.950.20026.500.006−9.89 0.004 34.550.003−6.23 0.042
Olfactory Tubercle 1.020.34135.790.002−5.28 0.048 70.630.000−7.95 0.010
Ventral Nucleus of Thalamus 0.980.35229.780.0049.02 0.007 20.890.0146.81 0.026
Lateral Dorsal Nucleus of Thalamus 3.600.09415.330.0327.01 0.017 18.440.0217.28 0.021
Lateral Posterior Nucleus of Thalamus 2.060.18915.960.0265.55 0.040 18.470.0185.650.059
Central Lateral Nucleus of Thalamus 3.090.11720.110.0147.18 0.014 24.460.0098.05 0.005
Medial Dorsal Thalamus 1.930.20315.710.0297.74 0.011 17.070.0267.31 0.016
Midline Thalamic Nuclei 7.550.02521.270.01110.00 0.002 15.910.0316.72 0.031
Thalamus 0.350.56813.290.0474.850.06513.890.0444.770.108
Cerebellum 4.240.07317.260.022−3.410.21221.950.011−5.050.089

auncorrected.

bfalse discovery rate corrected.

SI, single-injured (n = 3); MI, multiple-injured (n = 3).

Statistically significant differences between SI and MI rats are indicated in boldface.

Figure 4

Mean DTI values at the two time points.

Data were extracted from each subject as a single value from the ROIs showing significance in the anatomical ROI analysis. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM for each experimental group (SS, single sham; SI, single-injured; MS, multiple sham; MI, multiple-injured).

Discussion

Elucidating the role of repeated mbTBI in the development of neurodegenerative conditions is a pressing issue for the military health care system. To that end, a better understanding of mbTBI pathobiology, the period of cerebral vulnerability between insults, and the synergistic effect of repeated injury is critical. In conducting a series of studies comparing single and repeated mild blast injury (5 overpressure exposures administered on consecutive days), we aimed to assess the extent of the damage accumulation in mbTBI (i.e., the cumulative effect of the injury) at different post-injury time points. Of particular interest to us is correlating cellular and molecular level changes with structural and neurocognitive changes toward a definitive diagnosis for mbTBI. The objective of this study was to determine if the exposure to single and repeated mild blast overpressure, which resulted in significant functional, cellular, and molecular changes, also induced structural changes that are detectable by ex vivo DTI. Based on a number of bTBI studies that implicate the hippocampus in the development of neurobehavioral symptoms, we expected to detect injury-induced structural and/or volumetric changes in this region due to its involvement in TBI3435. We previously found significantly increased numbers of apoptotic, TUNEL-positive cells in the hilus and granular cell layer of the hippocampus as early as 2 h post-injury in both single- and multiple-injured rats36. However, we found no significant changes in hippocampal volume or FA in the hippocampus in our current study. This discrepancy may be related to the current spatial resolution of DTI. Another plausible explanation is that even though we found significantly increased rates of cell death in the hippocampus, we also found a substantive gliotic response30313337. Such astroglial hypertrophy can potentially compensate for the loss in volume caused by cell death. A recent ex vivo DTI rodent study has shown that the microstructure of the hippocampus can be significantly affected in mbTBI23. Consistent with impaired cognitive performance, FA values were significantly decreased in select brain regions of blast-exposed rats relative to their sham controls at 4 and 30 days post-injury. The affected brain regions included the hippocampus, thalamus, and brainstem. It is important to note, however, that the blast model and experimental design of our and the Budde et al. study are very different. Nonetheless, hippocampal abnormalities have been found in a number of clinical mbTBI studies using various imaging modalities121517383940. Since no significant hippocampal changes were detected in our work, an automated, anatomical ROI analysis without a priori assumptions of affected regions was used to examine the brains23. Compared to a voxel by voxel approach that includes thousands of independent statistical tests, the whole brain anatomical ROI approach reduces the number of statistical comparisons but avoids tedious manual definition of brain regions41. The results of this analysis demonstrated significant changes that are largely confined to midline thalamic structures and the cerebellum. Post hoc analysis revealed that SI and MI rats were significantly different from one another in the thalamus and thalamic nuclei. Previous bTBI studies also found changes in the thalamus using DTI23 and histological methods42. Thalamus-mediated functions account for a significant number of the most frequently reported neurobehavioral symptoms in clinical mbTBI. Among the leading complaints are sleep and emotional disturbances as well as altered sensory sensitivities, both auditory and visual14. Cerebellar abnormalities have been found in most human bTBI imaging studies12151643 and in a recent rodent bTBI study24. These findings illustrate the region-specific vulnerability of the brain to different types of physical insults—an important albeit poorly understood issue in TBI. The cerebellum's susceptibility to injury maybe due to its anatomy; it is located in a relatively small sub-compartment of the skull and the ratio between cerebellar white and grey matters is different from that in the cerebrum. Primary blast injury mainly exerts damage at the interface of biological materials with differing physiochemical properties (e.g., grey and white matter). Indeed, white matter damage—including cerebellar white matter—has been found in virtually all human bTBI imaging studies. Functionally, the cerebellum is involved in certain cognitive and learning functions, hence the detected changes are consistent with clinically observed abnormalities4445. Among the other affected brain structures is the stria terminalis, which serves as a major relay site within the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis46. Similar changes were also found in the olfactory tubercule, including the islands of Calleja. The olfactory tubercule has been shown to play a role in behavioral response as it is interconnected with several brain regions with sensory and arousal/reward functions47. In fact, injury to the islands as a result of restricted blood flow has been linked to a number of behavioral and emotional responses such as amnesia and changes in personality—behavioral changes that are not possible to assess in animal models. A critical limitation toward better understanding human mbTBI is inherent variability as well as the unknown biophysical forces that are experienced during injury. Additionally, most existing DTI studies of veterans have been performed years after the injury. Animal models of mbTBI allow for direct testing of the many effects of blast wave characteristics under carefully controlled conditions48. However, we currently have no clear understanding of how human years (physiologically and pathologically speaking) translate into rat months (or weeks). Furthermore, the lack of a consensus regarding a high fidelity experimental bTBI model—as demonstrated by the imaging findings obtained using various blast models—is a major impediment to studying the physical and biological effects of primary blast injury. Another pressing issue is how DTI findings in mbTBI (or any other neurological disorder) relate to changes detectable by proteomics or histology. We emphasize this point because although rats terminated at 42 days did not exhibit significant ROI changes as measured by DTI, proteomic analyses of plasma at the same time point showed significant and persistent molecular pathologies in SI as well as MI rats3649. These include inflammation, metabolic and vascular changes, neuronal and glial cell damage and/or death, and axonal damage. A technical limitation of our study is the use of fixed tissues in ex vivo DTI, mainly due to altered diffusivity of water molecules. Nonetheless, previous studies have demonstrated that ex vivo DTI provides valuable structural information that correlates with in vivo changes albeit to a varying extent. This may partially account for the poor correlation between cellular changes obtained by conventional histology and volumetric/DTI measures in the hippocampus. It should be noted that animal in vivo imaging has its own issues with scanning times (and corresponding anesthesia times), image acquisition protocols, and motion artifacts being the major ones. Despite the increased attention in recent years on blast as a mechanism of mTBI, the subject of how blast waves affect the brain along with diagnosing mbTBI are still a matter of considerable debate. The abovementioned caveats underline the importance of combining objective and clinically relevant outcome measures in experimental TBI to validate and correlate findings, to enable more direct comparisons of pathologies observed in animal and in clinical TBI research, and to enable the development of sensitive and specific diagnostics for mbTBI29.

Methods

Animals and housing conditions

A total of 60 male Sprague Dawley rats (weight at arrival: 245–265 g) (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were used in the original experiments3649. All animals were housed in standard rat cages with a built-in filter in a reverse 12-h light 12-h dark cycle with food and water ad lib. Animals were handled according to protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Uniformed Services University (USU; Bethesda, MD).

Experimental groups and manipulations

All animals underwent a 5 day acclimation and handling period and were later assigned to the following groups: naïve, single sham (SS), single-injured (SI), multiple sham (MS), and multiple-injured (MI) as described earlier3649. Rat numbers in the early and late termination groups were: (N = 30; naïve = 3, SS = 6, SI = 7, MS = 6, MI = 8) and (N = 30; naïve = 3, SS = 6, SI = 7, MS = 6, MI = 8), respectively. Naïve rats were kept in the animal facility at USU without any manipulation for the duration of the studies. SS rats were transported once from USU to Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (Silver Spring, MD) and anesthetized in an induction chamber with a 4% isoflurane (Forane; Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL) in air mixture delivered at 2 L/min for 6 min. MS rats were similarly transported and anesthetized once per day for 5 consecutive days. SI and MI rats underwent the same procedures as their respective sham controls in addition to receiving a single or multiple (5 total) mild blast exposure(s)3649.

Injury conditions

Anesthetized rats in chest protection (weight at injury: 300–330 g) were placed in the shock tube holder in a transverse prone position with the right side facing the direction of the membrane and the incidence of the blast waves. Blast overpressure was generated using a compressed air-driven shock tube yielding a single blast overpressure wave (average peak total pressure: ~137 kPa at the animal level) to produce a mild injury as described in detail313750. Following blast (or equivalent time spent anesthetized as a sham), animals were moved to an adjacent bench top for observation and then transported back to the USU animal facility at the conclusion of each injury day.

Preparation of specimens for imaging

A subset of animals from each experiment [(2 h termination: n = 11; SS = 2, SI = 3, MS = 3, MI = 3) and (42 day termination: n = 16; SS = 4, SI = 4, MS = 4, MI = 4)] was used for MRI/DTI analyses; all other animals were used for proteomics as described earlier3649. Rats were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane inhalant until a tail pinch produced no reflex movement, then transcardially perfused with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by a 4% paraformaldehyde in 1x PBS solution. The brains were removed and post-fixed in the same solution overnight at 4°C and then transferred to a 1x PBS solution containing 0.1% sodium azide until scanning. No hemorrhage or any other signs of macroscopic damage were detected in any of the animals.

Image acquisition

Fixed brains underwent ex vivo DTI within 2 days of perfusion fixation on a Bruker 7 T vertical bore system. Brains were immersed in susceptibility-matching fluid (Fomblin; Solvay Solexis, Inc., West Deptford, NJ) and inserted into a radiofrequency coil 3 cm in diameter. A three-echo diffusion-weighted spin echo sequence was employed (TR = 4 s; TE = 20 ms (first echo; 7.5 ms echo spacing) to acquire diffusion-weighted images (b = 1200 s/mm2) along 30 directions51 with diffusion gradient duration (δ) and separation (Δ) of 4 and 10 ms, respectively, along with 5 non diffusion-weighted images52. The slice thickness was 0.5 mm with an in-plane resolution of 0.234 mm2 and a 30 mm2 field of view (1282 matrix). The full experiment required 6 h of continuous imaging. DTI data was reconstructed using a linear least squares fit to derive parameter maps of FA, AD, and RD using custom Matlab routines53.

Data analysis

The analysis of MRI data included volumetric and DTI measures in the hippocampus and an anatomical ROI analysis of DTI data without a priori assumptions of affected regions. Hippocampal volume and FA in the hippocampus were derived from manual segmentation of the hippocampus on T2-weighted and FA maps, respectively, by an operator blinded to animal conditions. For unbiased quantification of DTI measures using anatomically based ROIs, DTI volumes from all subjects were first registered to a common space using an iterative, tensor-based registration routine implemented in DTI-TK54. Rigid-body, affine, and diffeomorphic (piecewise affine) methods were used in succession to progressively improve registration accuracy, as this approach has been shown to be superior to other routines55. The final image resolution was 120 × 120 × 500 μm3. Anatomical ROIs were derived from a digital rat brain atlas included as part of the Medical Image Visualization and Analysis Software (MIVA) software package56. The regions consisted of 87 subregions of the brain initially derived from the Paxinos Rat brain atlas57. A mask of white matter regions derived from the atlas was registered to a mask of white matter regions derived from DTI by thresholding the FA maps at 0.2. An FA value of 0.2 was chosen empirically since it effectively masked the white matter tracts. It should be noted that this threshold value was used for the registration of the ROIs, not for quantification. Registration employed a point-set based registration metric incorporated into Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTS) software package, including elastic warping58. The resulting overlap demonstrated high correspondence between the DTI and atlas-based white matter structures (Fig. 1C). The mean FA, AD, and RD within each ROI were derived from each of the registered DTI volumes from each subject for subsequent statistical analysis (Fig. 4).

Statistical analysis

Twenty-seven animals were used for the analyses (2 h termination, N = 11; 42 day termination, N = 16). A mixed-effect ANOVA was first performed to identify any significant effects of left/right (L/R) asymmetry. Since none of the brain regions exhibited a significant Blast x No. of Events x Side (L/R) interaction, the effect of side was collapsed for all subsequent analyses. For hippocampal volume and FA in the hippocampus, ANOVAs followed by Tukey's HSD test were performed separately at each time point. Subsequently, a one-way ANOVA was performed for each condition across the two time points. For DTI, a two-way ANOVA was performed to compare the main effects of Blast x No. of Events interaction. Regions that exhibited a significant interaction were subjected to post-hoc analysis using a Student's t-test to compare the SI and MI groups. All statistical tests were corrected for multiple comparisons (87 individual ROIs) by controlling for the false discovery rate59. A Spearman correlation analysis was used to identify brain regions significantly correlated to either the number of blast events or the number of sham events. A corrected p value of 0.05 was considered significant for all tests.

Author Contributions

A.K. and E.K. carried out animal studies, including the preparation of specimens for imaging. J.L. designed and supervised blast overpressure exposures at Walter Reed. M.B. performed and analyzed MRI/DTI measures under J.F.'s supervision at the NIH. A.K., M.B., and D.A. wrote the main manuscript text; A.K. and M.B. generated and formatted figures 1–4 and table 1. A.K. and D.A. reviewed the manuscript prior to submission.
  58 in total

1.  A multimodal imaging study in U.S. veterans of Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom with and without major depression after blast-related concussion.

Authors:  Scott C Matthews; Irina A Strigo; Alan N Simmons; Ryan M O'Connell; Lindsay E Reinhardt; Suzanne A Moseley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in blast-exposed military veterans and a blast neurotrauma mouse model.

Authors:  Lee E Goldstein; Andrew M Fisher; Chad A Tagge; Xiao-Lei Zhang; Libor Velisek; John A Sullivan; Chirag Upreti; Jonathan M Kracht; Maria Ericsson; Mark W Wojnarowicz; Cezar J Goletiani; Giorgi M Maglakelidze; Noel Casey; Juliet A Moncaster; Olga Minaeva; Robert D Moir; Christopher J Nowinski; Robert A Stern; Robert C Cantu; James Geiling; Jan K Blusztajn; Benjamin L Wolozin; Tsuneya Ikezu; Thor D Stein; Andrew E Budson; Neil W Kowall; David Chargin; Andre Sharon; Sudad Saman; Garth F Hall; William C Moss; Robin O Cleveland; Rudolph E Tanzi; Patric K Stanton; Ann C McKee
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Diffusion tensor imaging of diffuse axonal injury in a rat brain trauma model.

Authors:  Yohan van de Looij; Franck Mauconduit; Marine Beaumont; Samuel Valable; Régine Farion; Gilles Francony; Jean-François Payen; Hana Lahrech
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 4.  Proteomic identification of biomarkers of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kevin K W Wang; Andrew K Ottens; Ming Cheng Liu; Stephen B Lewis; Colleen Meegan; Monika W Oli; Frank C Tortella; Ronald L Hayes
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.940

5.  The contribution of gliosis to diffusion tensor anisotropy and tractography following traumatic brain injury: validation in the rat using Fourier analysis of stained tissue sections.

Authors:  Matthew D Budde; Lindsay Janes; Eric Gold; Lisa Christine Turtzo; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 6.  Physiology and pathophysiology of nitric oxide in the nervous system, with special mention of the islands of Calleja and the circunventricular organs.

Authors:  J Rodrigo; D Alonso; M L Bentura; S Castro-Blanco; J M Encinas; A P Fernández; P Fernández-Vizarra; A Richart; M Santacana; J Serrano; A Martínez
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Differential recovery of behavioral status and brain function assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging after mild traumatic brain injury in the rat.

Authors:  Nils Henninger; Kenneth M Sicard; Zhixin Li; Praveen Kulkarni; Stephan Dützmann; Christian Urbanek; Stefan Schwab; Marc Fisher
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Stress and traumatic brain injury: a behavioral, proteomics, and histological study.

Authors:  Sook-Kyung C Kwon; Erzsebet Kovesdi; Andrea B Gyorgy; Daniel Wingo; Alaa Kamnaksh; John Walker; Joseph B Long; Denes V Agoston
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Application of blood-based biomarkers in human mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Alex P Di Battista; Shawn G Rhind; Andrew J Baker
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Diffusion tensor imaging studies of mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuta Aoki; Ryota Inokuchi; Masataka Gunshin; Naoki Yahagi; Hiroshi Suwa
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  18 in total

1.  Common Patterns of Regional Brain Injury Detectable by Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Otherwise Normal-Appearing White Matter in Patients with Early Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Kristine H O'Phelan; Chad K Otoshi; Thomas Ernst; Linda Chang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Modeling the Long-Term Consequences of Repeated Blast-Induced Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries.

Authors:  Denes V Agoston
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Diffuse axonal injury has a characteristic multidimensional MRI signature in the human brain.

Authors:  Dan Benjamini; Diego Iacono; Michal E Komlosh; Daniel P Perl; David L Brody; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Correlation of Histomorphometric Changes with Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Evaluation of Blast-Induced Auditory Neurodegeneration in Chinchilla.

Authors:  Kathiravan Kaliyappan; Johan Nakuci; Marilena Preda; Ferdinand Schweser; Sarah Muldoon; Vijaya Prakash Krishnan Muthaiah
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  The Temporal Pattern of Changes in Serum Biomarker Levels Reveals Complex and Dynamically Changing Pathologies after Exposure to a Single Low-Intensity Blast in Mice.

Authors:  Farid Ahmed; Stefan Plantman; Ibolja Cernak; Denes V Agoston
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  A mouse Model of Focal Vascular Injury Induces Astrocyte Reactivity, Tau Oligomers, and Aberrant Behavior.

Authors:  Aric F Logsdon; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Ryan C Turner; Xinlan Li; Chris E Adkins; Afroz S Mohammad; Jason D Huber; Charles L Rosen; Paul R Lockman
Journal:  Arch Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-30

7.  Chronic elevation of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) is associated with a history of blast exposure.

Authors:  James S Meabon; David G Cook; Mayumi Yagi; Garth E Terry; Donna J Cross; Mark Muzi; Kathleen F Pagulayan; Aric F Logsdon; Abigail G Schindler; Vikas Ghai; Kai Wang; Shannon Fallen; Yong Zhou; Taek-Kyun Kim; Inyoul Lee; William A Banks; Erik S Carlson; Cynthia Mayer; Rebecca C Hendrickson; Murray A Raskind; Desiree A Marshall; Daniel P Perl; C Dirk Keene; Elaine R Peskind
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  Jagged-2 enhances immunomodulatory activity in adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Zhu Xishan; Zhang Bin; Zhao Haiyue; Dou Xiaowei; Bai Jingwen; Zhang Guojun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Blood brain barrier dysfunction and delayed neurological deficits in mild traumatic brain injury induced by blast shock waves.

Authors:  Ashok K Shetty; Vikas Mishra; Maheedhar Kodali; Bharathi Hattiangady
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.505

10.  Enduring deficits in memory and neuronal pathology after blast-induced traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajja; W Brad Hubbard; Christina S Hall; Farhad Ghoddoussi; Matthew P Galloway; Pamela J VandeVord
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.