| Literature DB >> 26537106 |
Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajja1, W Brad Hubbard1, Christina S Hall1, Farhad Ghoddoussi2, Matthew P Galloway2,3, Pamela J VandeVord1,4.
Abstract
Few preclinical studies have assessed the long-term neuropathology and behavioral deficits after sustaining blast-induced neurotrauma (BINT). Previous studies have shown extensive astrogliosis and cell death at acute stages (<7 days) but the temporal response at a chronic stage has yet to be ascertained. Here, we used behavioral assays, immmunohistochemistry and neurochemistry in limbic areas such as the amygdala (Amy), Hippocampus (Hipp), nucleus accumbens (Nac), and prefrontal cortex (PFC), to determine the long-term effects of a single blast exposure. Behavioral results identified elevated avoidance behavior and decreased short-term memory at either one or three months after a single blast event. At three months after BINT, markers for neurodegeneration (FJB) and microglia activation (Iba-1) increased while index of mature neurons (NeuN) significantly decreased in all brain regions examined. Gliosis (GFAP) increased in all regions except the Nac but only PFC was positive for apoptosis (caspase-3). At three months, tau was selectively elevated in the PFC and Hipp whereas α-synuclein transiently increased in the Hipp at one month after blast exposure. The composite neurochemical measure, myo-inositol+glycine/creatine, was consistently increased in each brain region three months following blast. Overall, a single blast event resulted in enduring long-term effects on behavior and neuropathological sequelae.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26537106 PMCID: PMC4633584 DOI: 10.1038/srep15075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) Blast animals actively avoided the light chamber as evidenced by the significant decrease of latency time for initial entry into dark chamber (*p < 0.05). (B) Decreased time spent with the novel object suggested a long-term disruption of learning and memory in blast group (*p < 0.05). In each case, the response of the control group was assigned 100% and response of blast groups scaled accordingly.
Consistent across brain regions, 3 months after blast, markers for neurodegeneration (FJB) and microglia activation (Iba-1) increased whereas an index of mature neurons (NeuN) decreased.
| Time point → | One month (Mean ± SEM) Control vs Blast (*p < 0.05) | Three months (Mean ± SEM) Control vs Blast (*p < 0.05) |
|---|---|---|
| Type of Stain | Region of brain (integrated density) | Region of brain (integrated density) |
| GFAP Astrocyte specific protein, marker of astrogliosis | HIPP: 4752 ± 854 vs 14954 ± 4098* | HIPP: 4241 ± 206 vs 6074 + 766* |
| AMY: 2982 ± 1173 vs 10143 ± 1170* | AMY: 1711 ± 749 vs 4557 ± 1008* | |
| PFC: 458 ± 113 vs 1103 ± 258* | PFC: 2467 ± 158 vs 4256 ± 214* | |
| NAC: 249 + 57 vs 251 ± 124 | NAC: 435 ± 67 vs 426 ± 51 | |
| FJB Marker of neurodegeneration | HIPP: 5264 ± 947 vs 5786 ± 824 | HIPP: 7249 ± 3532 vs 23376 ± 5565* |
| AMY: 3573 ± 884 vs 11862 ± 1252* | AMY: 7405 ± 1489 vs 32407 ± 2371* | |
| PFC: 432 ± 258 vs 1944 ± 412* | PFC: 1668 ± 658 vs 8594 ± 1205* | |
| NAC: 432 ± 147 vs 447 ± 151 | NAC: 697 ± 147 vs 1296 ± 251* | |
| NeuN Neuron specific protein (Rbfox3) | HIPP: 1431 ± 113 vs 1415 ± 307 | HIPP: 2022 ± 305 vs 1230 ± 192* |
| AMY: 389 ± 61 vs 218 ± 46* | AMY: 328 ± 53 vs 147 ± 30* | |
| PFC: 1882 ± 230 vs 944 ± 226* | PFC: 1561 ± 195 vs 545 ± 3 7* | |
| NAC: 1116 ± 207 vs 535 ± 74* | NAC: 605 ± 76 vs 308 ± 61* | |
| Tau Microtubule structure | HIPP: 5312 ± 1039 vs 5666 ± 1065 | HIPP: 880 ± 190 vs 3995 ± 1337* |
| PFC: 1071 ± 267 vs 1080 ± 144 | PFC: 949 ± 600 vs 2061 ± 705* | |
| Iba-1 Microglia specific calcium binding protein, microgliosis | HIPP: 7818 ± 444 vs 11775 ± 2019* | HIPP: 1647 ± 699 vs 5668 ± 1581* |
| AMY: 4170 ± 256 vs 6864 ± 939* | AMY: 1225 ± 321 vs 3056 ± 531* | |
| PFC: 2532 ± 128 vs 3291 + 245* | PFC: 948 + 117 vs 1365 ± 102* | |
| NAC: 1123 ± 97 vs 1605 ± 101* | NAC: 1812 ± 258 vs 3044 ± 154* | |
| Cleaved caspase-3 Protease required for apoptosis | HIPP: 1564 ± 523 vs 1678 ± 626 | HIPP: 4623 ± 190 vs 4645 ± 159 |
| AMY: 1541 ± 153 vs 1419 ± 196 | AMY: 6960 ± 316 vs 7133 ± 369 | |
| PFC: 576 ± 58 vs 894 ± 205* | PFC: 1982 ± 131 vs 2854 ± 163* | |
| NAC: 175 ± 47 vs 178 ± 51 | NAC: 375 ± 67 vs 406 ± 36 |
Similarly, gliosis (GFAP) increased at both time points in all regions except the Nac which showed no indication of scarring. Only the PFC was positive for apoptosis (caspase-3). Three months after insult, the microtubule protein tau was selectively elevated only in the Hipp and PFC, whereas α-synuclein transiently increased in the Hipp one month after blast exposure.
Figure 2Left Panels: Increased astrogliosis (GFAP+) (*p < 0.05) was observed in Hipp (A1), Amy (B1) and PFC (C1), but no changes were observed in Nac (D1) when blast group was compared to control group at 1 and 3 months following exposure. Representative immunochemical images for GFAP in the dentate gyrus (DG) area of control (E1) and blast group (F1). Right panels: Increased microglia (Iba-1) (*p < 0.05) was observed in Hipp (A2), Amy (B2), PFC (C2) and Nac (D2) when blast group was compared to controls at 1 and 3 month following exposure. Representative immunohistochemistry images are shown for Iba-1 in the DG of control (E2) and blast groups (F2).
Figure 3Top panels: Only the PFC (C1) showed signs of apoptotic activity in the extended period after blast.
No significant increases in caspase-3 were noted in Hipp (A1), Amy (B1) or Nac (D1) when compared to controls at 1 month. Representative immunohistochemistry images for caspase-3 in PFC from control (E1) and blast groups (F1). Bottom panels: Increased neurodegeneration (FJB+ neurons) was observed in all regions at 3 months whereas only the Amy (B2) and PFC (C2) showed degeneration at one month (*p < 0.05). Representative immunohistochemistry images are shown for Fluoro-Jade B in CA3 of Hipp from control (E2) and blast groups (F2).
Figure 4Top panels: Staining for NeuN, a protein found exclusively in mature neurons, was decreased in Amy (B1), Hipp (A1), Nac (D1), and PFC (C1) of blast animals (*p < 0.05). Representative immunochemical staining for NeuN (red) in the DG of control (E1) and blast groups (F1) are shown. Bottom panels: Increased tau pathology was observed in Hipp (A2) and PFC (B2) obtained three months after blast, when compared to control group (*p < 0.05). Representative immunochemical staining for tau (green) in DG from control (C2) and blast group animals at 3 months (D2) are shown.