Literature DB >> 24786739

Ongoing pregnancy qualifies best as the primary outcome measure of choice in trials in reproductive medicine: an opinion paper.

Miriam Braakhekke1, Esme I Kamphuis2, Eline A Dancet2, Femke Mol2, Fulco van der Veen2, Ben W Mol3.   

Abstract

The most appropriate primary outcome measure for reproductive medicine has been discussed frequently. In 2003 the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology recommended that the outcome measure of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and non-ART should be singleton live birth. Although live birth is indeed the aim of clinical practice, and there is no discussion that it should be reported in infertility trials, we hereby provide arguments that plead for using ongoing pregnancy as the primary outcome in such trials. We feel that ongoing pregnancy best serves the many purposes of a primary outcome and best reflects the effectiveness of a treatment.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RCT; ongoing pregnancy; primary outcome measure; reproductive medicine; singleton outcome measure

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24786739     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

1.  Investigating the Optimal Time for Intrauterine Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Infusion in Order to Improve IVF Outcome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Petroula Tsioulou; Polina Giannelou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Agni Pantou; George Anifandis; Panagiotis Christopoulos; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  The change in endometrial thickness following progesterone exposure correlates with in vitro fertilization outcome after transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts.

Authors:  Leah Kaye; Melody A Rasouli; Angela Liu; Ankita Raman; Carrie Bedient; Forest C Garner; Bruce S Shapiro
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Bich Ngoc Bui; Sarah F Lensen; Ahmed Gibreel; Wellington P Martins; Helen Torrance; Frank J Broekmans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-18

Review 4.  No common denominator: a review of outcome measures in IVF RCTs.

Authors:  Jack Wilkinson; Stephen A Roberts; Marian Showell; Daniel R Brison; Andy Vail
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Surgery for women with endometrioma prior to in vitro fertilisation: proposal for a feasible multicentre randomised clinical trial in the UK.

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; Jemma Healey; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Kevin Cooper; Lucky Saraswat; Andrew W Horne; Jane Daniels; Suzanne Breeman; Kate Brian; Gwenda Burns; Jemma Hudson; Katie Gillies
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-06-06

6.  Septum resection in women with a septate uterus: a cohort study.

Authors:  J F W Rikken; K W J Verhorstert; M H Emanuel; M Y Bongers; T Spinder; W K H Kuchenbecker; F W Jansen; J W van der Steeg; C A H Janssen; K Kapiteijn; W A Schols; B Torrenga; H L Torrance; H R Verhoeve; J A F Huirne; A Hoek; T E Nieboer; I A J van Rooij; T J Clark; L Robinson; M D Stephenson; B W J Mol; F van der Veen; M van Wely; M Goddijn
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Effectiveness of a mobile preconception lifestyle programme in couples undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF): the protocol for the PreLiFe randomised controlled trial (PreLiFe-RCT).

Authors:  Tessy Boedt; Eline Dancet; Sharon Lie Fong; Karen Peeraer; Diane De Neubourg; Sofie Pelckmans; Arne van de Vijver; Jan Seghers; Katleen Van der Gucht; Ben Van Calster; Carl Spiessens; Christophe Matthys
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Cost-effectiveness of medically assisted reproduction or expectant management for unexplained subfertility: when to start treatment?

Authors:  R van Eekelen; M J Eijkemans; M Mochtar; F Mol; B W Mol; H Groen; M van Wely
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Alessandro Conforti; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan; Salvatore Longobardi; Thomas D'Hooghe; Raoul Orvieto; Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Fulvio Zullo; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  The effect of treatment delay on time-to-recovery in the presence of unobserved heterogeneity.

Authors:  Nan van Geloven; Theodor A Balan; Hein Putter; Saskia le Cessie
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.