Literature DB >> 24785828

Patterns of DNA methylation in animals: an ecotoxicological perspective.

Jessica A Head1.   

Abstract

DNA methylation refers to the addition of a methyl group to nucleotides within DNA. As with other epigenetic endpoints, patterns of DNA methylation are susceptible to alterations due to exposure to environmental stressors, including contaminants. These alterations can persist in the absence of the initial stressor as cells divide, and can even be inherited between generations if they occur in the germ line. Although our knowledge concerning patterns of DNA methylation in animals is increasing, there remains a gap in the literature when it comes to species outside of those typically used for biomedical research. Here, I review the literature relating to DNA methylation in an array of taxa (mammals, fish, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and invertebrates) and discuss these data from an ecotoxicological perspective. The pattern and extent of DNA methylation is well conserved across species of vertebrates; methylation appears mainly on cytosine residues within a CpG context, and much of the genome is methylated, with the notable exception of cytosines within CpG islands in the promoters of genes. Highly methylated genes in vertebrates tend to be transcriptionally repressed. However, large differences occur between classes of vertebrates in terms of the timing and nature of reprogramming and genomic imprinting: epigenetic processes that establish patterns of DNA methylation in the early embryo and which are sensitive to environmental stress. In invertebrates, patterns of DNA methylation are extremely variable and differ significantly from the condition observed in vertebrates. Some invertebrate genomes exhibit no DNA methylation while others are methylated to a level that is comparable to vertebrates. Additionally, DNA methylation may have different functions in invertebrates, e.g., alternative splicing. This variability in basic patterns of DNA methylation among species during sensitive periods of development suggests that responses to epigenetically active environmental contaminants may be similarly variable. For example, the timing of exposure to a contaminant may be a critical factor when considered in the light of variable reprogramming schedules among species. With this in mind, I review data relating to the effects of contaminants on DNA methylation in animals, focusing on non-model organisms and on exposures in natural environments, when possible. An ecotoxicological perspective on patterns of DNA methylation in animals may improve our understanding of the range and diversity of epigenetic phenomena in the natural world.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24785828     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icu025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  27 in total

1.  The Role of Epigenomics in Aquatic Toxicology.

Authors:  Susanne M Brander; Adam D Biales; Richard E Connon
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Does epigenetic 'memory' of early-life stress predispose to chronic pain in later life? A potential role for the stress regulator FKBP5.

Authors:  S M Géranton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The effects of the neonicotinoid imidacloprid on gene expression and DNA methylation in the buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris.

Authors:  P S A Bebane; B J Hunt; M Pegoraro; A R C Jones; H Marshall; E Rosato; E B Mallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  The Tsetse Metabolic Gambit: Living on Blood by Relying on Symbionts Demands Synchronization.

Authors:  Mason H Lee; Miguel Medina Munoz; Rita V M Rio
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  Regulation of BDNF chromatin status and promoter accessibility in a neural correlate of associative learning.

Authors:  Ganesh Ambigapathy; Zhaoqing Zheng; Joyce Keifer
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.528

6.  Rearing environment affects the genetic architecture and plasticity of DNA methylation in Chinook salmon.

Authors:  Clare J Venney; Kyle W Wellband; Daniel D Heath
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 7.  Epigenetic function of activation-induced cytidine deaminase and its link to lymphomagenesis.

Authors:  Pilar M Dominguez; Rita Shaknovich
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Does Arsenic Contamination Affect DNA Methylation Patterns in a Wild Bird Population? An Experimental Approach.

Authors:  Veronika N Laine; Mark Verschuuren; Kees van Oers; Silvia Espín; Pablo Sánchez-Virosta; Tapio Eeva; Suvi Ruuskanen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Population differences in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) DNA methylation: Genetic drift and environmental factors.

Authors:  Clare J Venney; Ben J G Sutherland; Terry D Beacham; Daniel D Heath
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The effect of experimental lead pollution on DNA methylation in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Hannu Mäkinen; Kees van Oers; Tapio Eeva; Suvi Ruuskanen
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.