Literature DB >> 23635684

2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.

L Stewart Massad1, Mark H Einstein, Warner K Huh, Hormuzd A Katki, Walter K Kinney, Mark Schiffman, Diane Solomon, Nicolas Wentzensen, Herschel W Lawson.   

Abstract

A group of 47 experts representing 23 professional societies, national and international health organizations, and federal agencies met in Bethesda, MD, September 14-15, 2012, to revise the 2006 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Consensus Guidelines. The group's goal was to provide revised evidence-based consensus guidelines for managing women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) following adoption of cervical cancer screening guidelines incorporating longer screening intervals and co-testing. In addition to literature review, data from almost 1.4 million women in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Medical Care Plan provided evidence on risk after abnormal tests. Where data were available, guidelines prescribed similar management for women with similar risks for CIN 3, AIS, and cancer. Most prior guidelines were reaffirmed. Examples of updates include: Human papillomavirus-negative atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance results are followed with co-testing at 3 years before return to routine screening and are not sufficient for exiting women from screening at age 65 years; women aged 21-24 years need less invasive management, especially for minor abnormalities; postcolposcopy management strategies incorporate co-testing; endocervical sampling reported as CIN 1 should be managed as CIN 1; unsatisfactory cytology should be repeated in most circumstances, even when HPV results from co-testing are known, while most cases of negative cytology with absent or insufficient endocervical cells or transformation zone component can be managed without intensive follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23635684     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182883a34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  181 in total

1.  Excess Cost of Cervical Cancer Screening Beyond Recommended Screening Ages or After Hysterectomy in a Single Institution.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Gretchen Hultman; McKenzie DeKam; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Levi S Downs; Melissa A Geller; Chap Le; Genevieve Melton; Shalini Kulasingam
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Overview of the CDC Cervical Cancer (Cx3) Study: an educational intervention of HPV testing for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Mona Saraiya; April Greek; Nikki A Hawkins; Katherine B Roland; Diane Manninen; Donatus U Ekwueme; Jacqueline W Miller; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Clinical and Immunologic Biomarkers for Histologic Regression of High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia and Clearance of HPV16 and HPV18 after Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew P Morrow; Kimberly A Kraynyak; Cornelia L Trimble; Mark L Bagarazzi; Albert J Sylvester; Michael Dallas; Dawson Knoblock; Jean D Boyer; Jian Yan; Russell Vang; Amir S Khan; Laurent Humeau; Niranjan Y Sardesai; J Joseph Kim; Stanley Plotkin; David B Weiner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  A common clinical dilemma: Management of abnormal vaginal cytology and human papillomavirus test results.

Authors:  Michelle J Khan; L Stewart Massad; Walter Kinney; Michael A Gold; E J Mayeaux; Teresa M Darragh; Philip E Castle; David Chelmow; Herschel W Lawson; Warner K Huh
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Interval from loop electrosurgical excision procedure to pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Shayna N Conner; Alison G Cahill; Methodius G Tuuli; David M Stamilio; Anthony O Odibo; Kimberly A Roehl; George A Macones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of VGX-3100, a therapeutic synthetic DNA vaccine targeting human papillomavirus 16 and 18 E6 and E7 proteins for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.

Authors:  Cornelia L Trimble; Matthew P Morrow; Kimberly A Kraynyak; Xuefei Shen; Michael Dallas; Jian Yan; Lance Edwards; R Lamar Parker; Lynette Denny; Mary Giffear; Ami Shah Brown; Kathleen Marcozzi-Pierce; Divya Shah; Anna M Slager; Albert J Sylvester; Amir Khan; Kate E Broderick; Robert J Juba; Timothy A Herring; Jean Boyer; Jessica Lee; Niranjan Y Sardesai; David B Weiner; Mark L Bagarazzi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Type-specific HPV and Pap test results among low-income, underserved women: providing insights into management strategies.

Authors:  Mona Saraiya; Vicki B Benard; April A Greek; Martin Steinau; Sonya Patel; L Stewart Massad; George F Sawaya; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Proof-of-principle study of a novel cervical screening and triage strategy: Computer-analyzed cytology to decide which HPV-positive women are likely to have ≥CIN2.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Kai Yu; Rosemary Zuna; S Terence Dunn; Han Zhang; Joan Walker; Michael Gold; Noorie Hyun; Greg Rydzak; Hormuzd A Katki; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Effect of preanalytical processing of ThinPrep specimens on detection of high-risk human papillomavirus by the Aptima HPV assay.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Elizabeth R Schroeder; Kevin C Ross; Connie Yauck; Theresa Bieganski; Robert D Amrhein; Maureen Napierala; April L Harkins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Human papillomavirus type-specific persistence and reappearance after successful conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Akiko Kudoh; Shinya Sato; Hiroaki Itamochi; Hiroaki Komatsu; Michiko Nonaka; Seiya Sato; Jun Chikumi; Muneaki Shimada; Tetsuro Oishi; Junzo Kigawa; Tasuku Harada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.