Literature DB >> 24785476

Radiographic and clinical outcomes following combined lateral lumbar interbody fusion and posterior segmental stabilization in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis.

Zachary J Tempel1, Gurpreet S Gandhoke, Christopher M Bonfield, David O Okonkwo, Adam S Kanter.   

Abstract

OBJECT: A hybrid approach of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) followed by supplementary open posterior segmental instrumented fusion (PSIF) has shown promising early results in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Studies assessing the impact of this combined approach on correction of segmental and regional coronal angulation, sagittal realignment, maximum Cobb angle, restoration of lumbar lordosis, and clinical outcomes are needed. The authors report their results of this approach for correction of adult degenerative scoliosis.
METHODS: Twenty-six patients underwent combined LLIF and PSIF in a staged fashion. The patient population consisted of 21 women and 5 men. Ages ranged from 40 to 77 years old. Radiographic measurements including coronal angulation, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis were taken preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively in all patients. Concurrently, the visual analog score (VAS) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were used to assess clinical outcomes in 19 patients.
RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, all patients who underwent combined LLIF and PSIF achieved statistically significant mean improvement in regional coronal angles (from 14.9° to 5.8°, p < 0.01) and segmental coronal angulation at all operative levels (p < 0.01). The maximum Cobb angle was significantly reduced postoperatively (from 41.1° to 15.1°, p < 0.05) and was maintained at follow-up (12.0°, p < 0.05). The mean lumbar lordosis-pelvic incidence mismatch was significantly improved postoperatively (from 15.0° to 6.92°, p < 0.05). Although regional lumbar lordosis improved (from 43.0° to 48.8°), it failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). The mean sagittal vertical axis was significantly improved postoperatively (from 59.5 mm to 34.2 mm, p < 0.01). The following scores improved significantly after surgery: VAS for back pain (from 7.5 to 4.3, p < 0.01) and leg pain (from 5.8 to 3.1, p < 0.01), ODI (from 48 to 38, p < 0.01), and PCS (from 27.5 to 35.0, p = 0.01); the MCS score did not improve significantly (from 43.2 to 45.5, p = 0.37). There were 3 major and 10 minor complications.
CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid approach of minimally invasive LLIF and open PSIF is an effective means of achieving correction of both coronal and sagittal deformity, resulting in improvement of quality of life in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24785476     DOI: 10.3171/2014.3.FOCUS13368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  23 in total

1.  Reoperation rates in minimally invasive, hybrid and open surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity with minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  D Kojo Hamilton; Adam S Kanter; Bryan D Bolinger; Gregory M Mundis; Stacie Nguyen; Praveen V Mummaneni; Neel Anand; Richard G Fessler; Peter G Passias; Paul Park; Frank La Marca; Juan S Uribe; Michael Y Wang; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Christopher I Shaffrey; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Adult spinal deformity: effectiveness of interbody lordotic cages to restore disc angle and spino-pelvic parameters through completely mini-invasive trans-psoas and hybrid approach.

Authors:  Giuseppe Barone; Laura Scaramuzzo; Antonino Zagra; Fabrizio Giudici; Andrea Perna; Luca Proietti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar decompressions and fusions.

Authors:  Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Jonathan S Markowitz; Krishna T Kudaravalli; Kelly H Yom; Kern Singh
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

5.  Oblique retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1 in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ki-Tack Kim; Dae-Jean Jo; Sang-Hyun Lee; Eun-Min Seo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Impaired bone mineral density as a predictor of graft subsidence following minimally invasive transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Zachary J Tempel; Gurpreet S Gandhoke; David O Okonkwo; Adam S Kanter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Vertebral body fracture following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF): report of two events out of 712 levels.

Authors:  Zachary J Tempel; Gurpreet S Gandhoke; Bryan D Bolinger; David O Okonkwo; Adam S Kanter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Restoring spinopelvic harmony with lateral lumbar interbody fusion: is it a realistic goal?

Authors:  Mina Asaid; Aram Cox; Monique Breslin; Declan Siedler; Chester Sutterlin; Arvind Dubey
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

9.  Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Conjunction with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation via the Wiltse Approach.

Authors:  Shu-Long Yang; Xiao-Yin Liu; Rong Ma; Jian-Qun Zhang; Si-Min Liang; Zhen Chen; Zong Pan; Zong-Jun Ma; Xiao-Li Ding; Yi Kang; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Zhao-Hui Ge
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  Comparison of outcomes between indirect decompression of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and MIS-TLIF in one single-level lumbar spondylosis.

Authors:  Shih-Feng Hung; Jen-Chung Liao; Tsung-Ting Tsai; Yun-Da Li; Ping-Yeh Chiu; Ming-Kai Hsieh; Fu-Cheng Kao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.