Literature DB >> 24784768

Crossbreeding: implications for dairy cow fertility and survival.

F Buckley1, N Lopez-Villalobos2, B J Heins3.   

Abstract

In pasture-based seasonal calving systems, failure to become pregnant during the breeding season results in important economic losses as maximum profit is attained by minimising costs and increasing the proportion of grass in the diet of the lactating dairy cow. In the United States, dairy producers primarily strive to maximise production potential but are becoming increasingly aware of the economic consequences of sub-optimal cow fertility and survival. For this reason, interest in crossbreeding is emerging. The objective of this paper is to review the fertility and survival outcomes reported from recent research studies and data analyses in Ireland, New Zealand and the United States. Research conducted in Ireland during the early 2000s concluded that of three 'alternative' dairy breeds the Norwegian Red was most suited to seasonal grass-based production. A key finding was favourable fertility and survival. A follow-up study confirmed a fertility advantage with Norwegian Red×Holstein-Friesian compared with Holstein-Friesian: proportion pregnant to first service; +0.08 and in-calf after 6 weeks breeding; +0.11. Another study found higher fertility with Jersey crossbreds: pregnant to first service; +0.21, and in-calf after 6 weeks breeding; +0.19. Studies conducted in Northern Ireland also found superior fertility performance with Jersey crossbred cows offered low and moderate concentrate diets. In New Zealand, crossbred dairy cattle (primarily Jersey×Friesian) are achieving similar rates of genetic gain for farm profit as the purebred populations, but creating additional gain derived from economic heterosis. In the United States, analysis of commercial data from California showed higher first-service conception rates for Scandinavian Red×Holstein (+6 percentage units) and Montbeliarde×Holstein (+10 percentage units) compared with Holstein (23%). They also exhibited fewer days open and greater survival. At Penn State University, Brown Swiss×Holstein cows had 17 fewer days open than Holstein cows during first lactation, and numerically fewer in second (12 days) and third lactation (6 days). At the University of Minnesota, crossbred cows had 21 percentage units higher first-service conception rates, 41 fewer days open and 12 percentage units higher in-calf rates compared with pure Holstein cows. They also had greater survival to second (+13 percentage units), third (+24 percentage units), fourth (+25 percentage units) and fifth (+17 percentage units) lactation. The literature clearly illustrates favourable animal performance benefits from crossbreeding, using a range of modern breeds, and within the context of both grass-based and high-input confinement production environments. Economic analyses generally indicate profitable performance owing to lower replacement cost and higher herd productivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24784768     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114000901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  9 in total

1.  Zootechnical and health performance of Holstein x Gir crossbred calves.

Authors:  Maria Amélia Agnes Weiller; Evandro Schmoeller; Laura Valadão Vieira; Antônio Amaral Barbosa; Josiane de Oliveira Feijó; Cássio Cassal Brauner; Eduardo Schmitt; Marcio Nunes Corrêa; Viviane Rohrig Rabassa; Francisco Augusto Burkert Del Pino
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Genetic diversity and population structure in divergent German cattle selection lines on the basis of milk protein polymorphisms.

Authors:  Lisa G Hohmann; Christina Weimann; Carsten Scheper; Georg Erhardt; Sven König
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2021-03-11

3.  N-Carbamoylglutamate Supplementation on the Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation, Milk Quality, Antioxidant Parameters, and Metabolites of Jersey Cattle in High-Altitude Areas.

Authors:  Zixin Liu; Fuyong Yan; Hui Mi; Xiaokang Lv; Kaijun Wang; Bin Li; Tao Jin; Liang Chen; Guijie Zhang; Ximei Huang; Chuanshe Zhou; Zhiliang Tan
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  Seizure occurrence in dogs under primary veterinary care in the UK: prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Alexander Erlen; Heidrun Potschka; Holger A Volk; Carola Sauter-Louis; Dan G O'Neill
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  The Association Between Genomic Heterozygosity and Carcass Merit in Cattle.

Authors:  David Kenny; Tara R Carthy; Craig P Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Performance and milk quality parameters of Jersey crossbreds in low-input dairy systems.

Authors:  Sabrina Ormston; Hannah Davis; Gillian Butler; Eleni Chatzidimitriou; Alan W Gordon; Katerina Theodoridou; Sharon Huws; Tianhai Yan; Carlo Leifert; Sokratis Stergiadis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Survey of Management Practices and Farmers' Perceptions of Diseases on Organic Dairy Cattle Farms in California.

Authors:  Sejin Cheong; Juliette Di Francesco; Kyuyoung Lee; Richard Van Vleck Pereira; Randi Black; Betsy Karle; Melissa Lema; Alda F A Pires
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.231

8.  Environment-Dependent Heterosis and Transgressive Gene Expression in Reciprocal Hybrids between the Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus and the Blue Catfish Ictalurus furcatus.

Authors:  Haolong Wang; Timothy J Bruce; Baofeng Su; Shangjia Li; Rex A Dunham; Xu Wang
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12

Review 9.  Historical Evolution of Cattle Management and Herd Health of Dairy Farms in OECD Countries.

Authors:  Ivo Medeiros; Aitor Fernandez-Novo; Susana Astiz; João Simões
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.