Literature DB >> 24780422

Thoracoscopic versus robotic approaches: advantages and disadvantages.

Benjamin Wei1, Thomas A D'Amico2.   

Abstract

The overall advantages of thoracoscopy over thoracotomy in terms of patient recovery have been fairly well established. The use of robotics, however, is a newer and less proven modality in the realm of thoracic surgery. Robotics offers distinct advantages and disadvantages in comparison with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Robotic technology is now used for a variety of complex cardiac, urologic, and gynecologic procedures including mitral valve repair and microsurgical treatment of male infertility. This article addresses the potential benefits and limitations of using the robotic platform for the performance of a variety of thoracic operations.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagectomy; Robotic surgery; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24780422     DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin            Impact factor:   1.750


  10 in total

1.  Robotic trans-subxiphoid extended thymectomy in a patient with thymoma-associated pemphigus.

Authors:  Yu Zheng; Yi-Zhou Cai; Han-Lu Zhang; Zi-Hao Wang; Yun Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Postoperative pain after lobectomy: robot-assisted, video-assisted and open thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Augustinus P T van der Ploeg; Ninos Ayez; George P Akkersdijk; Charles C van Rossem; Peter D de Rooij
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 3.  Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy.

Authors:  Carlo Curcio; Roberto Scaramuzzi; Dario Amore
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-11-07

4.  Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery: a promising tool should not be denied.

Authors:  Han Wu; Hecheng Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Management of Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction: Finally a Consensus.

Authors:  Lawrence Kleinberg; Malcolm Brock; Michael Gibson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-07

6.  Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Zhao Li; Jing-Pei Li; Xiong Qin; Bin-Bin Xu; Yu-Dong Han; Si-Da Liu; Wen-Zhuo Zhu; Ming-Zheng Peng; Qiang Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Feasibility and safety of robot-assisted thoracic surgery for lung lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shiyou Wei; Minghao Chen; Nan Chen; Lunxu Liu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Robotic and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Comparison of Long-Term Pain at a Single Centre.

Authors:  Alberto Testori; Veronica Maria Giudici; Emanuele Voulaz; Marco Alloisio; Edoardo Bottoni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Robotic versus thoracoscopic lung resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Emmert; Carmen Straube; Judith Buentzel; Christian Roever
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Yogita S Patel; Waël C Hanna; Christine Fahim; Yaron Shargall; Thomas K Waddell; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Tiago N Machuca; Mauricio Pipkin; Jean-Marc Baste; Feng Xie; Andrea Shiwcharan; Gary Foster; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.