Literature DB >> 24777536

A synthesis of methane emissions from 71 northern, temperate, and subtropical wetlands.

Merritt R Turetsky1, Agnieszka Kotowska, Jill Bubier, Nancy B Dise, Patrick Crill, Ed R C Hornibrook, Kari Minkkinen, Tim R Moore, Isla H Myers-Smith, Hannu Nykänen, David Olefeldt, Janne Rinne, Sanna Saarnio, Narasinha Shurpali, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, J Michael Waddington, Jeffrey R White, Kimberly P Wickland, Martin Wilmking.   

Abstract

Wetlands are the largest natural source of atmospheric methane. Here, we assess controls on methane flux using a database of approximately 19 000 instantaneous measurements from 71 wetland sites located across subtropical, temperate, and northern high latitude regions. Our analyses confirm general controls on wetland methane emissions from soil temperature, water table, and vegetation, but also show that these relationships are modified depending on wetland type (bog, fen, or swamp), region (subarctic to temperate), and disturbance. Fen methane flux was more sensitive to vegetation and less sensitive to temperature than bog or swamp fluxes. The optimal water table for methane flux was consistently below the peat surface in bogs, close to the peat surface in poor fens, and above the peat surface in rich fens. However, the largest flux in bogs occurred when dry 30-day averaged antecedent conditions were followed by wet conditions, while in fens and swamps, the largest flux occurred when both 30-day averaged antecedent and current conditions were wet. Drained wetlands exhibited distinct characteristics, e.g. the absence of large flux following wet and warm conditions, suggesting that the same functional relationships between methane flux and environmental conditions cannot be used across pristine and disturbed wetlands. Together, our results suggest that water table and temperature are dominant controls on methane flux in pristine bogs and swamps, while other processes, such as vascular transport in pristine fens, have the potential to partially override the effect of these controls in other wetland types. Because wetland types vary in methane emissions and have distinct controls, these ecosystems need to be considered separately to yield reliable estimates of global wetland methane release.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bog; carbon; disturbance; fen; graminoids; peat; swamp; temperature; vegetation; water table

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24777536     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  24 in total

1.  Microbial community composition across a coastal hydrological system affected by submarine groundwater discharge (SGD).

Authors:  Dini Adyasari; Christiane Hassenrück; Daniel Montiel; Natasha Dimova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Beaver-mediated methane emission: The effects of population growth in Eurasia and the Americas.

Authors:  Colin J Whitfield; Helen M Baulch; Kwok P Chun; Cherie J Westbrook
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Estimating greenhouse gas emissions at the soil-atmosphere interface in forested watersheds of the US Northeast.

Authors:  Joshua Gomez; Philippe Vidon; Jordan Gross; Colin Beier; Jesse Caputo; Myron Mitchell
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  The Rhizosphere Responds: Rich Fen Peat and Root Microbial Ecology after Long-Term Water Table Manipulation.

Authors:  Danielle L Rupp; Louis J Lamit; Stephen M Techtmann; Evan S Kane; Erik A Lilleskov; Merritt R Turetsky
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Distinct Anaerobic Bacterial Consumers of Cellobiose-Derived Carbon in Boreal Fens with Different CO2/CH4 Production Ratios.

Authors:  Heli Juottonen; Alexander Eiler; Christina Biasi; Eeva-Stiina Tuittila; Kim Yrjälä; Hannu Fritze
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The role of oxygen in stimulating methane production in wetlands.

Authors:  Jared L Wilmoth; Jeffra K Schaefer; Danielle R Schlesinger; Spencer W Roth; Patrick G Hatcher; Julie K Shoemaker; Xinning Zhang
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 13.211

7.  Tropical wetlands: A missing link in the global carbon cycle?

Authors:  Sofie Sjögersten; Colin R Black; Stephanie Evers; Jorge Hoyos-Santillan; Emma L Wright; Benjamin L Turner
Journal:  Global Biogeochem Cycles       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 5.703

8.  Quantifying landscape-level methane fluxes in subarctic Finland using a multiscale approach.

Authors:  Iain P Hartley; Timothy C Hill; Thomas J Wade; Robert J Clement; John B Moncrieff; Ana Prieto-Blanco; Mathias I Disney; Brian Huntley; Mathew Williams; Nicholas J K Howden; Philip A Wookey; Robert Baxter
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Accelerated vegetation succession but no hydrological change in a boreal fen during 20 years of recent climate change.

Authors:  Tiina H M Kolari; Pasi Korpelainen; Timo Kumpula; Teemu Tahvanainen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Tropical/Subtropical Peatland Development and Global CH4 during the Last Glaciation.

Authors:  Hai Xu; Jianghu Lan; Enguo Sheng; Yong Liu; Bin Liu; Keke Yu; Yuanda Ye; Peng Cheng; Xiaoke Qiang; Fengyan Lu; Xulong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.