Literature DB >> 24772673

Evaluation of a rapid analyte measurement platform and real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay West Nile virus detection system in mosquito pools.

Kristen L Burkhalter, Kalanthe Horiuchi, Brad J Biggerstaff, Harry M Savage, Roger S Nasci.   

Abstract

We evaluated the commercially available Rapid Analyte Measurement Platform (RAMP) West Nile virus (WNV) antigen detection test for sensitivity and consistency with real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmation testing. Panels of samples consisting of WNV-spiked mosquito pools and negative control pools were sent to 20 mosquito abatement districts (MADs) that processed the pools using the RAMP assay. The samples were then sent to the reference laboratories used by the MADs for confirmation by real-time RT-PCR. Positive pools with virus titers of roughly 1-3 log10 PFU/ml had RAMP scores above the RAMP test positive cutoff score of 30 RAMP units, but these virus-positive samples could not be reliably confirmed by real-time RT-PCR testing. Pools with virus titers > or =4 log10 PFU/ml scored > or =50 RAMP units. Real-time RT-PCR results varied among the confirmation laboratories. With few exceptions, pools returning a RAMP score of > or =100 were confirmed with real-time RT-PCR, while pools returning a RAMP score of 50-99 appeared to be at the limit of real-time RT-PCR detection. Therefore, we recommend using a positive cutoff of 50 RAMP units with no real-time RT-PCR confirmation to maximize speed, efficiency, and economy of the RAMP assay. A more conservative approach would be to implement a "gray zone" range of 50-100 RAMP units. Pools scoring within the gray zone could be submitted for real-time RT-PCR confirmation with the understanding that positive pools may not confirm due to the inhibitory effect of the RAMP buffer on the real-time RT-PCR assay. We also conducted a series of experiments using laboratory-prepared mosquito pools spiked with WNV to compare mosquito homogenization buffers, pool sizes, and grinding methods in order to determine how these variables affect the RAMP and real-time RT-PCR assay results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24772673      PMCID: PMC7111561          DOI: 10.2987/13-6386.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc        ISSN: 8756-971X            Impact factor:   0.917


  7 in total

1.  West Nile virus in the United States: guidelines for detection, prevention, and control.

Authors:  D J Gubler; G L Campbell; R Nasci; N Komar; L Petersen; J T Roehrig
Journal:  Viral Immunol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.257

2.  Detection of West Nile virus antigen in mosquitoes and avian tissues by a monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  Ann R Hunt; Roy A Hall; Amy J Kerst; Roger S Nasci; Harry M Savage; Nicholas A Panella; Kristy L Gottfried; Kristen L Burkhalter; John T Roehrig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of commercial assays for detecting West Nile virus antigen.

Authors:  Kristen L Burkhalter; Robbin Lindsay; Robert Anderson; Antonia Dibernardo; Whalley Fong; Roger S Nasci
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 0.917

4.  Rapid detection of west nile virus from human clinical specimens, field-collected mosquitoes, and avian samples by a TaqMan reverse transcriptase-PCR assay.

Authors:  R S Lanciotti; A J Kerst; R S Nasci; M S Godsey; C J Mitchell; H M Savage; N Komar; N A Panella; B C Allen; K E Volpe; B S Davis; J T Roehrig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of West Nile virus in large pools of mosquitoes.

Authors:  Genevieve L Sutherland; Roger S Nasci
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.917

6.  Evaluation of a rapid analyte measurement platform for West Nile virus detection based on United States mosquito control programs.

Authors:  Banugopan Kesavaraju; Ary Farajollahi; Richard L Lampman; Michael Hutchinson; Nina M Krasavin; Sonya E Graves; Sammie L Dickson
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Virus detection protocols for west nile virus in vertebrate and mosquito specimens.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Kauffman; Susan A Jones; Alan P Dupuis; Kiet A Ngo; Kristen A Bernard; Laura D Kramer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Development of an Electrochemical Paper-Based Analytical Device for Trace Detection of Virus Particles.

Authors:  Robert B Channon; Yuanyuan Yang; Kristen M Feibelman; Brian J Geiss; David S Dandy; Charles S Henry
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Laboratory Evaluation of Commercially Available Platforms to Detect West Nile and Zika Viruses From Honey Cards.

Authors:  Kristen L Burkhalter; Keenan Wiggins; Nathan Burkett-Cadena; Barry W Alto
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.278

Review 3.  Diagnostic Approach for Arboviral Infections in the United States.

Authors:  Anne Piantadosi; Sanjat Kanjilal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  A Simple Modification to the Mosquito Homogenization Protocol Safely Inactivates West Nile Virus and Allows Virus Detection by the Rapid Analyte Measurement Platform (RAMP®) ASSAY.

Authors:  Kristen L Burkhalter; Brad J Biggerstaff; Kalanthe Horiuchi; Harry M Savage
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.917

5.  Evaluating the Use of Commercial West Nile Virus Antigens as Positive Controls in the Rapid Analyte Measurement Platform West Nile Virus Assay.

Authors:  Kristen L Burkhalter; Harry M Savage
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.917

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.