Literature DB >> 24772129

Effects of low-dose amiodarone and Betaloc on the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy complicated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

Yu Gao1, Peisheng Zhang2, Xue Liang3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the therapeutic effects of low-dose amiodarone and Betaloc on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy complicated by malignant ventricular arrhythmias.
METHODS: Eighty-two such patients were selected and divided into a treatment group and a control group by the random number method (n=41), which were administered with low-dose amiodarone plus Betaloc and individual Betaloc respectively.
RESULTS: The treatment group had a significantly higher overall effective rate (85.4%) than the control group (65.9%) did. Based on the New York Heart Association's classification of cardiovascular disease, the treatment group mainly comprised Class III and IV patients before treatment, which were significantly relieved after treatment (P<0.05). The heart rate was evidently decreased from (119.99±18.91) bpm to (80.98±12.34) bpm, and the incidences of premature ventricular contraction and tachycardia were significantly reduced (P<0.05). The longest QT intervals after and before treatment were (421±32) ms and (411±35) ms respectively. The shortest QT interval after treatment [(350±36) ms] was significantly longer than that before [(307±31) ms]. The QT dispersion before treatment [(96±29) ms] was significantly higher that after [(64±17) ms] (P<0.05). Six out of eighty two patients in the treatment group succumbed to adverse reactions (14.63%).
CONCLUSION: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy complicated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias can be well treated with low-dose amiodarone and Betaloc, with mitigated symptoms, improved prognosis and few adverse reactions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amiodarone; Betaloc; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Malignant ventricular arrhythmias

Year:  2014        PMID: 24772129      PMCID: PMC3998996     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pak J Med Sci        ISSN: 1681-715X            Impact factor:   1.088


INTRODUCTION

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, a common cardiovascular disease, is associated with gene mutation.[1] With disease progression, patients suffer from fatigue, dyspnea, dizziness, and even sudden cardiac death.[2] Particularly, the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients complicated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias are more prone to sudden cardiac death.[3] Therefore, controlling the symptoms promotes the prognosis. Amiodarone, which is a Class III antiarrhythmic agent, functions by prolonging the effective refractory period of myocardial cells, decreasing the interval between action potentials, and eliminating reentry.[4] Betaloc, a β-receptor blocker, can also treat arrhythmia by exerting antagonistic action on excited β-receptor through binding the ectopic pacemaker β1 adrenergic receptor of cardiomyocytes.[5] Therefore, we herein aimed to study the effects of low-dose amiodarone in combination with Betaloc on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy complicated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

METHODS

All the studies were approved by the ethics committee of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, and consent was obtained from all patients. Eighty-two hypertrophic cardiomyopathy complicated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias patients who were treated in our hospital from March 2010 to March 2013 were selected, including 58 males and 24 females aged 24-53 years old, with the average age of (33.63±6.42) years old. All the patients suffered from sudden palpitation, dyspnea and chest tightness, and they were diagnosed as soon as possible after Holter examination, echocardiography and chest radiography. The patients were divided into a treatment group and a control group (n=41) by the random number method. The treatment group consisted of 29 males and 12 females aged 25-53 years old (average: 33.53±6.22), and the control group comprised 29 males and 12 females aged 24-53 years old (average: 33.73±6.62). The patients with ion disorder-induced arrhythmia, as well as abnormal liver, kidney and thyroid functions were excluded. There were no significant differences between the clinical features of the two groups (P>0.05). According to the Holter examination results and Lown's grading of premature ventricular contraction (PVC), only Grade 3 and above patients were selected in this study.[6] "Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy"[7] was also used for patient selection. The patients with atrial fibrillation, hyperthyroidism and drug-induced arrhythmias were excluded. The treatment group was orally administered with low-dose amiodarone and Betaloc ; Amiodarone: 0.2 g, bid; Betaloc: 6.25 mg, bid. After one week, the dose of amiodarone was decreased to 0.1 g (qd) and maintained thereafter. The dose of Betaloc was increased to 12.5 mg (bid) based on the patients' tolerance and maintained thereafter. The control group was only administered with Betaloc at the same dose. The patients were treated for a period of three months.. The two groups were subjected to Holter examination before and after three treatment courses, during which they were also examined by routine electrocardiography. The longest and shortest QT intervals, QT dispersion, and adverse reaction events were observed. [8] : The therapeutic effects were evaluated according to the Holter examination outcomes. Effective: Absence of sustained ventricular tachycardia, the incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia was decreased by over 90%, and PVCs were decreased by over 75%. Ineffective: Presence of sustained and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, and unrelieved PVCs. All data were analyzed by SPSS 17.0. The measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and compared by t test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The overall effective rate of the treatment group (85.4%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (65.9%) (P<0.05) (Table-I).
Table-I

Comparison between therapeutic effects

Group Case No. Markedly effective Effective Ineffective Overall effective rate
Control group4114131465.9
Treatment group412411685.4a

Compared with the control group,

P<0.05.

The liver and kidney functions of patients did not differ significantly before and after treatment (P>0.05). The NYHA Class III and IV patients were significantly decreased after treatment (P<0.05). Besides, the heart rate was significantly reduced from (119.99±18.91) bpm to (80.98±12.34) bpm (P<0.05). Moreover, the incidences of PVC and tachycardia were also significantly lowered (P<0.05) (Table-II).
Table-II

Liver, kidney, and cardiac functions before and after treatment

Item Case No. Before
After
t/χ 2 P
Class III Class IV Class I Class II Class III Class IV
Tachycardia4014 (35)3 (7.5)9.0383<0.05
NYHA classification402713325935.6721<0.05
Heart rate (bpm)40119.99±18.9180.98±12.3410.9265<0.05
PVC4034 (85)9 (22.5)31.4268<0.05
The longest QT intervals after and before treatment were (421±32) ms and (411±35) ms respectively. The shortest QT interval after treatment [(350±36) ms] was significantly longer than that before [(307±31) ms]. The QT dispersion before treatment [(96±29) ms] was significantly higher that after [(64±17) ms] (P<0.05) (Table-III).
Table-III

Longest, shortest QT intervals and QT dispersion before and after treatment

Index Before After
Longest QT interval411±35421±32
Shortest QT interval307±31350±36a
QT dispersion96±2964±17a

Compared with the results before treatment,

P<0.05.

Four patients in the treatment group were prone to nausea and vomiting which were mitigated without influencing the outcomes. Two patients who suffered from sinus bradycardia claimed tolerance, thus being further treated without special care. The incidence of adverse reactions was 14.63% (6/41).

DISCUSSION

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, a cardiovascular disease, is related with the mutation of gene-encoding cardiac sarcomeric genes.[9] The patients are clinically manifested as differently thicked cardiac muscle fibers that results from asymmetric ventricular hypertrophy and disorderedly arranged myocardial cells. Therefore, reentrant excitation is induced owing to different pathways of cardiac electrophysiological conduction. Reentrant excitation may give rise to various ventricular arrhythmia symptoms. With disease progression, patients may die of sudden cardiac death due to hemodynamic instability.[10] Especially, 0.1%-1.0% of the patients may die without early signs.[11] It has previously been reported that malignant arrhythmia was directly associated with sudden cardiac death.[12],[13] Comparison between therapeutic effects Compared with the control group, P<0.05. Liver, kidney, and cardiac functions before and after treatment Longest, shortest QT intervals and QT dispersion before and after treatment Compared with the results before treatment, P<0.05. Amiodarone, as a Class III antiarrhythmic agent, can prolong the effective refractory period of myocardial cells, shorten the interval between action potentials, decelerate conduction and terminate reentrant excitation by non-competitively binding α- and β-adrenergic receptors on the myocardial cell membrane.[14] In this study, the patients were also well treated with amiodarone. Betaloc, which is a β-receptor blocker, can clinically treat hypertension patients who have fast heart rates. Betaloc effectively stabilizes ventricular rate by binding β1 adrenergic receptor, exerting antagonistic effects on its excitation, suppressing sympathetic excitement, decreasing the phase-4 depolarization rate and phase-0 action potential rising rate of cardiomyocytes, as well as reducing their self-regulation and conduction rate.[15] Meanwhile, Betaloc can inhibit the proliferation and overoxidation of myocardial cells, prevent them from apoptosis, reverse cardiac remodeling, and alleviate ventricular hypertrophy.[16] Hence, Betaloc not only facilitates the control of ventricular rate and arrhythmia, but also promotes the reversion of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In this study, low-dose amiodarone in combination with Betaloc treated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy complicated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias effectively and safely. QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the electrical cycle of heart. QT dispersion, i.e. maximum QT interval minus minimum QT interval, is a non-invasive index reflecting the instability of electrical activity in ventricular myocytes and the inhomogeneity of repolarization.[17] In this study, the longest QT interval was not significantly changed after treatment, while the shortest QT interval was significantly prolonged and QT dispersion was dramatically shortened, Since QT dispersion is a predicting factor of ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death,[18] the shortened one in this study suggested satisfactory therapeutic effects and improved prognosis. In summary, low-dose amiodarone plus Betaloc can treat hypertrophic cardiomyopathy complicated with malignant ventricular arrhythmias with excellent outcomes, improved prognosis and few adverse reactions, thus being worthy of wider application.
  18 in total

1.  Acute myocardial infarction complicated by atrial fibrillation in the elderly: prevalence and outcomes.

Authors:  S S Rathore; A K Berger; K P Weinfurt; K A Schulman; W J Oetgen; B J Gersh; A J Solomon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Long-term outcome of alcohol septal ablation in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a word of caution.

Authors:  Folkert J ten Cate; Osama I I Soliman; Michelle Michels; Dominic A M J Theuns; Peter L de Jong; Marcel L Geleijnse; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 3.  [Acute treatment of stable hemodynamically tolerable ventricular tachycardia].

Authors:  W Haverkamp; S Rolf; M Stockburger; R Dietz
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.698

4.  Longitudinal left ventricular strain in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: correlation with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Emanuel Correia; Bruno Rodrigues; Luís Ferreira Santos; Davide Moreira; Pedro Gama; Costa Cabral; Oliveira Santos
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 1.724

5.  Angiotensin II and angiotensin II receptor blocker modulate the arrhythmogenic activity of pulmonary veins.

Authors:  Yi-Jen Chen; Yao-Chang Chen; Ching-Tai Tai; Hung-I Yeh; Cheng-I Lin; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Relationship of functional mitral regurgitation to new-onset atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Fadel Bahouth; Diab Mutlak; Moran Furman; Anees Musallam; Haim Hammerman; Jonathan Lessick; Saleem Dabbah; Shimon Reisner; Yoram Agmon; Doron Aronson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Angiotensin II receptor blockade reduces new-onset atrial fibrillation and subsequent stroke compared to atenolol: the Losartan Intervention For End Point Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study.

Authors:  Kristian Wachtell; Mika Lehto; Eva Gerdts; Michael H Olsen; Björn Hornestam; Björn Dahlöf; Hans Ibsen; Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Lars H Lindholm; Markku S Nieminen; Richard B Devereux
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Why and how to support screening strategies to prevent sudden death in athletes.

Authors:  Gaetano Thiene; Domenico Corrado; Ilaria Rigato; Cristina Basso
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Randomised trial of outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with frequent or repetitive ventricular premature depolarisations: CAMIAT. Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J A Cairns; S J Connolly; R Roberts; M Gent
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Drug treatment and thrombolytics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Fabian Spöhr; Volker Wenzel; Bernd W Böttiger
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.706

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Amiodarone versus other pharmacological interventions for prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Claro; Roberto Candia; Gabriel Rada; Fernando Baraona; Francisco Larrondo; Luz M Letelier
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.