AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: As glycaemia and the incidence of microvascular diabetes complications follow a log-linear relationship, it becomes increasingly difficult to demonstrate a microvascular benefit of glucose-lowering when the HbA1c level is close to normal. METHODS: The Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial randomised 12,537 people with diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose to receivestandard glycaemic care or standard care with the addition of basal insulin glargine (A21Gly,B31Arg,B32Arg human insulin), targeting a fasting plasma glucose level ≤5.3 mmol/l. Microvascular outcomes during a median follow-up of 6.2 years were examined in participants whose baseline HbA1c was above or below the median of 6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol). RESULTS: Allocation to the insulin glargine group reduced the incidence of the primary microvascular composite outcome of kidney and eye disease in participants whose baseline HbA1c level was ≥6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol; HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.81, 0.99]) but not in participants with a lower baseline HbA1c (HR 1.07 [95% CI 0.95, 1.20]; p value for interaction 0.031). In people whose baseline HbA1c level was ≥6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol), the median post-randomisation change in HbA1c was -0.65% (interquartile range -0.16, -0.91%) after allocation to insulin glargine and -0.33% (-0.83, 0.13%) after allocation to standard care (median HbA1c difference 0.33%; p < 0.0001). A smaller median difference of 0.22% was noted in people whose baseline HbA1c was <6.4% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: In patients with dysglycaemia, intervention targeting normal fasting glucose levels reduced HbA1c and attenuated the risk of microvascular outcomes in participants with a baseline HbA1c level ≥6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol). A neutral effect was seen in those with a lower baseline HbA1c level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00069784.
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: As glycaemia and the incidence of microvascular diabetes complications follow a log-linear relationship, it becomes increasingly difficult to demonstrate a microvascular benefit of glucose-lowering when the HbA1c level is close to normal. METHODS: The Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial randomised 12,537 people with diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose to receive standard glycaemic care or standard care with the addition of basal insulin glargine (A21Gly,B31Arg,B32Arg humaninsulin), targeting a fasting plasma glucose level ≤5.3 mmol/l. Microvascular outcomes during a median follow-up of 6.2 years were examined in participants whose baseline HbA1c was above or below the median of 6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol). RESULTS: Allocation to the insulinglargine group reduced the incidence of the primary microvascular composite outcome of kidney and eye disease in participants whose baseline HbA1c level was ≥6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol; HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.81, 0.99]) but not in participants with a lower baseline HbA1c (HR 1.07 [95% CI 0.95, 1.20]; p value for interaction 0.031). In people whose baseline HbA1c level was ≥6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol), the median post-randomisation change in HbA1c was -0.65% (interquartile range -0.16, -0.91%) after allocation to insulinglargine and -0.33% (-0.83, 0.13%) after allocation to standard care (median HbA1c difference 0.33%; p < 0.0001). A smaller median difference of 0.22% was noted in people whose baseline HbA1c was <6.4% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: In patients with dysglycaemia, intervention targeting normal fasting glucose levels reduced HbA1c and attenuated the risk of microvascular outcomes in participants with a baseline HbA1c level ≥6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol). A neutral effect was seen in those with a lower baseline HbA1c level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00069784.
Authors: Anushka Patel; Stephen MacMahon; John Chalmers; Bruce Neal; Laurent Billot; Mark Woodward; Michel Marre; Mark Cooper; Paul Glasziou; Diederick Grobbee; Pavel Hamet; Stephen Harrap; Simon Heller; Lisheng Liu; Giuseppe Mancia; Carl Erik Mogensen; Changyu Pan; Neil Poulter; Anthony Rodgers; Bryan Williams; Severine Bompoint; Bastiaan E de Galan; Rohina Joshi; Florence Travert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-06-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Timothy Craven; Mary Ann Banerji; Jan Basile; Jorge Calles; Robert M Cohen; Robert Cuddihy; William C Cushman; Saul Genuth; Richard H Grimm; Bruce P Hamilton; Byron Hoogwerf; Diane Karl; Lois Katz; Armand Krikorian; Patrick O'Connor; Rodica Pop-Busui; Ulrich Schubart; Debra Simmons; Harris Taylor; Abraham Thomas; Daniel Weiss; Irene Hramiak Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Hertzel C Gerstein; Jackie Bosch; Gilles R Dagenais; Rafael Díaz; Hyejung Jung; Aldo P Maggioni; Janice Pogue; Jeffrey Probstfield; Ambady Ramachandran; Matthew C Riddle; Lars E Rydén; Salim Yusuf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David M Nathan; Peter H Bennett; Jill P Crandall; Sharon L Edelstein; Ronald B Goldberg; Steven E Kahn; William C Knowler; Kieren J Mather; Sunder Mudaliar; Trevor J Orchard; Marinella Temprosa; Neil H White Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Elinor C Mannon; Christina L Sartain; Trevin C Wilkes; Jingping Sun; Aaron J Polichnowski; Paul M O'Connor Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2021-08-16