The purpose of this study is to compare scanning electron microscopy findings of the blister roof in three distinct bullous diseases: one intraepidermal acantholytic (pemphigus foliaceus); one due to hemidesmosomal dysfunction (bullous pemphigoid); and one secondary to anchoring fibril dysfunction - type VII collagen (dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa). In pemphigus foliaceus, acantholytic phenomena were readily demonstrated. In bullous pemphigoid, the epidermis had a solid aspect. In dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa a net was seen in the blister roof.
The purpose of this study is to compare scanning electron microscopy findings of the blister roof in three distinct bullous diseases: one intraepidermal acantholytic (pemphigus foliaceus); one due to hemidesmosomal dysfunction (bullous pemphigoid); and one secondary to anchoring fibril dysfunction - type VII collagen (dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa). In pemphigus foliaceus, acantholytic phenomena were readily demonstrated. In bullous pemphigoid, the epidermis had a solid aspect. In dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa a net was seen in the blister roof.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is a technique used for high-resolution
three-dimensional analyses. It is very useful to examine the surface of solid specimens,
e.g., in dentistry. In dermatology, one application includes the diagnosis of hair
conditions.[1] However, few
reports were found on the use of SEM for bullous diseases.[2-4]Bullous diseases have different pathogenic factors, and may be due to mutations of
proteins involved in intercellular or dermal-epidermal adhesion or to autoimmune,
acquired damage to these proteins.[5,6,7]
The cleavage level depends on the proteins involved and their resulting dysfunctions
(Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
Schematic representation of cleavage levels (arrows) in a normal epidermis stained
with the APAAP technique. The black line represents the basement membrane (BM).
a) Intraepidermal lesion in desmosomal defects. b)
Dermoepidermal cleavage in hemidesmosomal defects, with persistence of the BM in
the blister floor. c) Dysfunction of type VII collagen (represented
by thin black lines) with cleavage under the BM, which remains attached to the
blister roof.
Schematic representation of cleavage levels (arrows) in a normal epidermis stained
with the APAAP technique. The black line represents the basement membrane (BM).
a) Intraepidermal lesion in desmosomal defects. b)
Dermoepidermal cleavage in hemidesmosomal defects, with persistence of the BM in
the blister floor. c) Dysfunction of type VII collagen (represented
by thin black lines) with cleavage under the BM, which remains attached to the
blister roof.The purpose of this study was to compare SEM findings of the blister roof in three
distinct bullous diseases: (1) one acantholytic intraepidermal (pemphigus foliaceus,
PF); (2) one due to hemidesmosomal dysfunction (bullous pemphigoid, BP); and (3) one
secondary to anchoring fibril dysfunction - type VII collagen (dystrophic epidermolysis
bullosa, DEB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A blister roof from each condition was cut using iris scissors, fixed in 10%
glutaraldehyde solution, routinely processed for SEM, with critical-point drying and
metal-coating, and subsequently inverted to expose the inner side of the blister to the
scanning electron microscope.The three diseases were diagnosed by the current gold standard: PF by direct
immunofluorescence, which demonstrated intercellular IgG deposition; BP by direct
immunofluorescence, which demonstrated linear fluorescence in the basement membrane
zone; and DEB by both immunomapping, which showed cleavage below the basement membrane,
which remained attached to the blister roof, and DNA sequencing for type VII collagen,
which confirmed mutation in the COL7A1 gene leading to a glycine
substitution in protein synthesis.
RESULTS
Pemphigus Foliaceus - under low magnification, in the inverted roof of the
PF blister, it was observed that the keratinocytes lost intercellular contact, becoming
polygonal; demonstrating acantholytic phenomena, some keratinocytes became rounded,
resembling the classic appearance of acantholytic cells under light microscopy (Figures 2 and 3).
FIGURE 2
SEM of a pemphigus foliaceus blister roof, showing isolated acantholytic
keratinocytes (original magnification x800)
FIGURE 3
SEM of a pemphigus foliaceus blister roof. a) acantholytic
keratinocytes (original magnification x1,000) with irregular contour.
b) detail of an acantholytic cell (original magnification
x3,000)
SEM of a pemphigus foliaceus blister roof, showing isolated acantholytic
keratinocytes (original magnification x800)SEM of a pemphigus foliaceus blister roof. a) acantholytic
keratinocytes (original magnification x1,000) with irregular contour.
b) detail of an acantholytic cell (original magnification
x3,000)Bullous Pemphigoid - under SEM, the blister roof showed a "solid"
epidermis, with a smooth surface and no loss of adhesion among keratinocytes; the basal
keratinocyte layer could be visualized, showing a regular, flat surface (Figure 4A). In some areas, the intercellular spaces
were visible (Figure 4B).
FIGURE 4
SEM of a bullous pemphigoid blister roof. a) epidermis without
acantholytic changes (original magnification x1,200). b) detail of
the cell membrane with a "solid" aspect and a visible intercellular space (arrow)
(original magnification x3,000)
SEM of a bullous pemphigoid blister roof. a) epidermis without
acantholytic changes (original magnification x1,200). b) detail of
the cell membrane with a "solid" aspect and a visible intercellular space (arrow)
(original magnification x3,000)Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa - examination of the inverted blister roof
in a DEB case allowed identification of a collagen net attached to the roof,
corroborating immunomapping findings, which demonstrated the basal membrane - collagen
IV on the blister roof (Figure 5). At higher
magnification, an artifactitious detachment of this collagen net was observed in the
border of the examined fragment, showing its interwoven and reticular characteristics
(Figure 6A). In the area located behind the
detachment, the basal cell membrane could be observed (similar to Figure 4B). In some areas, under very high magnification, the
attachment of the collagen net to the cell membrane could be seen (Figure 6B).
FIGURE 5
SEM of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, showing a collagen net attached to the
blister roof (original magnification x300)
FIGURE 6
SEM of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. a) Border of the examined fragment, with
artifactitious detachment of the collagen net (large arrow) showing the solid
aspect of the cell membrane, with intercellular clefts similar to those shown in
Figure 4b (original magnification x
3,000). b) adhesion of the collagen net to the cell membrane, showing normal
hemidesmosomal function (arrows) (original magnification x5,000)
SEM of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, showing a collagen net attached to the
blister roof (original magnification x300)SEM of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. a) Border of the examined fragment, with
artifactitious detachment of the collagen net (large arrow) showing the solid
aspect of the cell membrane, with intercellular clefts similar to those shown in
Figure 4b (original magnification x
3,000). b) adhesion of the collagen net to the cell membrane, showing normal
hemidesmosomal function (arrows) (original magnification x5,000)
DISCUSSION
In biological research, SEM usually provides very illustrative three-dimensional images
showing the varied aspects of the specimen.We did not find any published studies comparing the ultrastructural aspects of blister
roofs in the literature. We chose three diseases with different pathogenetic mechanisms
leading to distinct tissue cleavage patterns: one intraepithelial acantholytic; one by
hemidesmosomal dysfunction, with loss of the epidermis; and another due to type VII
collagen damage, leading to loss of the epidermis along with the basal membrane.In PF, we were able to document the acantholytic phenomena caused by the desmosomal
lesion, showing three-dimensionally acantholytic keratinocytes. As expected, the
findings were poorer for BP, without acantholysis, and demonstrating the aspect of the
basal keratinocyte cell membrane.In DEB, due to the pathological loss of the basal membrane, we were able to document the
ultrastructure of type IV collagen, under pathological cicatricial conditions which is
classified as netforming collagen, in agreement with our findings.[8] In addition, we were able to observe
adhesion of the collagen fibers to the cell membrane in some areas, threedimensionally
demonstrating the hemidesmosomal function of attaching the basement membrane to the
basal keratinocyte.Although SEM is difficult to use in the diagnosis of bullous dermatoses, it proved to be
valuable in demonstrating the patterns of tissue injury found in these diseases.
Authors: Zilda Najjar Prado de Oliveira; Alexandre M Périgo; Lígia M I Fukumori; Valéria Aoki Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.896