Literature DB >> 24769114

Cardiac differentiation of cardiosphere-derived cells in scaffolds mimicking morphology of the cardiac extracellular matrix.

Yanyi Xu1, Sourav Patnaik2, Xiaolei Guo1, Zhenqing Li1, Wilson Lo3, Ryan Butler4, Andrew Claude4, Zhenguo Liu5, Ge Zhang6, Jun Liao2, Peter M Anderson1, Jianjun Guan7.   

Abstract

Stem cell therapy has the potential to regenerate heart tissue after myocardial infarction (MI). The regeneration is dependent upon cardiac differentiation of the delivered stem cells. We hypothesized that timing of the stem cell delivery determines the extent of cardiac differentiation as cell differentiation is dependent on matrix properties such as biomechanics, structure and morphology, and these properties in cardiac extracellular matrix (ECM) continuously vary with time after MI. In order to elucidate the relationship between ECM properties and cardiac differentiation, we created an in vitro model based on ECM-mimicking fibers and a type of cardiac progenitor cell, cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs). A simultaneous fiber electrospinning and cell electrospraying technique was utilized to fabricate constructs. By blending a highly soft hydrogel with a relatively stiff polyurethane and modulating fabrication parameters, tissue constructs with similar cell adhesion property but different global modulus, single fiber modulus, fiber density and fiber alignment were achieved. The CDCs remained alive within the constructs during a 1week culture period. CDC cardiac differentiation was dependent on the scaffold modulus, fiber volume fraction and fiber alignment. Two constructs with relatively low scaffold modulus, ∼50-60kPa, most significantly directed the CDC differentiation into mature cardiomyocytes as evidenced by gene expressions of cardiac troponin T (cTnT), calcium channel (CACNA1c) and cardiac myosin heavy chain (MYH6), and protein expressions of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and connexin 43 (CX43). Of these two low-modulus constructs, the extent of differentiation was greater for lower fiber alignment and higher fiber volume fraction. These results suggest that cardiac ECM properties may have an effect on cardiac differentiation of delivered stem cells.
Copyright © 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac differentiation; Cardiosphere-derived cells; Matrix modulus; Stem cell therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24769114      PMCID: PMC6029687          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  60 in total

1.  High-efficiency matrix modulus-induced cardiac differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells inside a thermosensitive hydrogel.

Authors:  Zhenqing Li; Xiaolei Guo; Andre F Palmer; Hiranmoy Das; Jianjun Guan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Mechanically activated integrin switch controls alpha5beta1 function.

Authors:  Julie C Friedland; Mark H Lee; David Boettiger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation.

Authors:  Andrew S Rowlands; Peter A George; Justin J Cooper-White
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 4.249

4.  Long-term outcome of stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction: right results, wrong reasons.

Authors:  James S Forrester; Raj R Makkar; Eduardo Marbán
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Gwendolen C Reilly; Adam J Engler
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Functional implications of myocardial scar structure.

Authors:  J W Holmes; J A Nuñez; J W Covell
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-05

7.  Analysis of healing after myocardial infarction using polarized light microscopy.

Authors:  P Whittaker; D R Boughner; R A Kloner
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Injectable, rapid gelling and highly flexible hydrogel composites as growth factor and cell carriers.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Zhenqing Li; Mahmood Khan; Kenichi Tamama; Periannan Kuppusamy; William R Wagner; Chandan K Sen; Jianjun Guan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Nathaniel Huebsch; Praveen R Arany; Angelo S Mao; Dmitry Shvartsman; Omar A Ali; Sidi A Bencherif; José Rivera-Feliciano; David J Mooney
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 43.841

10.  Validation of the cardiosphere method to culture cardiac progenitor cells from myocardial tissue.

Authors:  Darryl R Davis; Yiqiang Zhang; Rachel R Smith; Ke Cheng; John Terrovitis; Konstantinos Malliaras; Tao-Sheng Li; Anthony White; Raj Makkar; Eduardo Marbán
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  Molecular imaging of stem cells for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Yi-Ning Wang; Zheng-Yu Jin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 2.  Extracellular Matrix-Based Biohybrid Materials for Engineering Compliant, Matrix-Dense Tissues.

Authors:  Laura G Bracaglia; John P Fisher
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 9.933

3.  Biomimetic polyurethane/TiO2 nanocomposite scaffolds capable of promoting biomineralization and mesenchymal stem cell proliferation.

Authors:  Qingxia Zhu; Xiaofei Li; Zhaobo Fan; Yanyi Xu; Hong Niu; Chao Li; Yu Dang; Zheng Huang; Yun Wang; Jianjun Guan
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.328

4.  In vitro comparative study of two decellularization protocols in search of an optimal myocardial scaffold for recellularization.

Authors:  Isaac Perea-Gil; Juan J Uriarte; Cristina Prat-Vidal; Carolina Gálvez-Montón; Santiago Roura; Aida Llucià-Valldeperas; Carolina Soler-Botija; Ramon Farré; Daniel Navajas; Antoni Bayes-Genis
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 5.  Injectable Bioengineered Hydrogel Therapy in the Treatment of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  John W MacArthur; Amanda N Steele; Andrew B Goldstone; Jeffrey E Cohen; William Hiesinger; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-04

6.  The extracellular matrix patch implanted in the right ventricle evaluated with cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol to assess regional physio-mechanical properties.

Authors:  Akiko Tanaka; Keigo Kawaji; Amit R Patel; Takeyoshi Ota
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-09-13

Review 7.  Current research trends and challenges in tissue engineering for mending broken hearts.

Authors:  Muhammad Qasim; Pala Arunkumar; Heather M Powell; Mahmood Khan
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 8.  Establishing Early Functional Perfusion and Structure in Tissue Engineered Cardiac Constructs.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Sourav S Patnaik; Bryn Brazile; J Ryan Butler; Andrew Claude; Ge Zhang; Jianjun Guan; Yi Hong; Jun Liao
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2015

9.  Image-guided stem cells with functionalized self-assembling peptide nanofibers for treatment of acute myocardial infarction in a mouse model.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Ying-Ying Chen; Xiu-Mei Wang; Kai Gao; Yun-Zhou Gao; Jian Cao; Zhuo-Li Zhang; Jing Lei; Zheng-Yu Jin; Yi-Ning Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

10.  Engineered Biomaterials to Enhance Stem Cell-Based Cardiac Tissue Engineering and Therapy.

Authors:  Anwarul Hasan; Renae Waters; Boustany Roula; Rahbani Dana; Seif Yara; Toubia Alexandre; Arghya Paul
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.