Literature DB >> 24768525

Quantified self and human movement: a review on the clinical impact of wearable sensing and feedback for gait analysis and intervention.

Pete B Shull1, Wisit Jirattigalachote2, Michael A Hunt3, Mark R Cutkosky2, Scott L Delp4.   

Abstract

The proliferation of miniaturized electronics has fueled a shift toward wearable sensors and feedback devices for the mass population. Quantified self and other similar movements involving wearable systems have gained recent interest. However, it is unclear what the clinical impact of these enabling technologies is on human gait. The purpose of this review is to assess clinical applications of wearable sensing and feedback for human gait and to identify areas of future research. Four electronic databases were searched to find articles employing wearable sensing or feedback for movements of the foot, ankle, shank, thigh, hip, pelvis, and trunk during gait. We retrieved 76 articles that met the inclusion criteria and identified four common clinical applications: (1) identifying movement disorders, (2) assessing surgical outcomes, (3) improving walking stability, and (4) reducing joint loading. Characteristics of knee and trunk motion were the most frequent gait parameters for both wearable sensing and wearable feedback. Most articles performed testing on healthy subjects, and the most prevalent patient populations were osteoarthritis, vestibular loss, Parkinson's disease, and post-stroke hemiplegia. The most widely used wearable sensors were inertial measurement units (accelerometer and gyroscope packaged together) and goniometers. Haptic (touch) and auditory were the most common feedback sensations. This review highlights the current state of the literature and demonstrates substantial potential clinical benefits of wearable sensing and feedback. Future research should focus on wearable sensing and feedback in patient populations, in natural human environments outside the laboratory such as at home or work, and on continuous, long-term monitoring and intervention.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofeedback; Gait retraining; Haptic; Motion analysis; Real-time feedback

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24768525     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  79 in total

1.  A data-driven framework for selecting and validating digital health metrics: use-case in neurological sensorimotor impairments.

Authors:  Christoph M Kanzler; Mike D Rinderknecht; Anne Schwarz; Ilse Lamers; Cynthia Gagnon; Jeremia P O Held; Peter Feys; Andreas R Luft; Roger Gassert; Olivier Lambercy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-05-29

Review 2.  Single-Subject Studies in Translational Nutrition Research.

Authors:  Nicholas J Schork; Laura H Goetz
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.848

3.  Unintended Consequences of Wearable Sensor Use in Healthcare. Contribution of the IMIA Wearable Sensors in Healthcare WG.

Authors:  M Schukat; D McCaldin; K Wang; G Schreier; N H Lovell; M Marschollek; S J Redmond
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

4.  A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli.

Authors:  Matthew J Leineweber; Sam Shi; Jan Andrysek
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Wearable Technology and Physical Activity in Chronic Disease: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Siobhan M Phillips; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Dori Rosenberg; Matthew P Buman; Brigid M Lynch
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Separation of rotational and translational segmental momentum to assess movement coordination during walking.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Cory L Christiansen; Amanda M Murray; Anne K Silverman; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  The current management of patients with patellofemoral pain from the physical therapist's perspective.

Authors:  Jacob John Capin; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Ann Jt       Date:  2018-05-14

8.  Physiotherapists' and Physiotherapy Students' Perspectives on the Use of Mobile or Wearable Technology in Their Practice.

Authors:  Jenna Blumenthal; Andrea Wilkinson; Mark Chignell
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

9.  Trunk movement compensations and corresponding core muscle demand during step ambulation in people with unilateral transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Cory L Christiansen; Amanda M Murray; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 10.  Technology in Parkinson's disease: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Alberto J Espay; Paolo Bonato; Fatta B Nahab; Walter Maetzler; John M Dean; Jochen Klucken; Bjoern M Eskofier; Aristide Merola; Fay Horak; Anthony E Lang; Ralf Reilmann; Joe Giuffrida; Alice Nieuwboer; Malcolm Horne; Max A Little; Irene Litvan; Tanya Simuni; E Ray Dorsey; Michelle A Burack; Ken Kubota; Anita Kamondi; Catarina Godinho; Jean-Francois Daneault; Georgia Mitsi; Lothar Krinke; Jeffery M Hausdorff; Bastiaan R Bloem; Spyros Papapetropoulos
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 10.338

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.