Literature DB >> 24768482

Low-echo sphere phantoms and methods for assessing imaging performance of medical ultrasound scanners.

Ernest L Madsen1, Chihwa Song2, Gary R Frank2.   

Abstract

Tissue-mimicking phantoms and software for quantifying the ability of human observers to detect small low-echo spheres as a function of depth have been developed. Detectability is related to the imager's ability to delineate the boundary of a 3-D object such as a spiculated tumor. The phantoms accommodate a broad range of transducer shapes and sizes. Three phantoms are described: one with 2-mm-diameter spheres (for higher frequencies), one with 3.2-mm-diameter spheres (for lower frequencies) and one with 4-mm-diameter spheres (for lower frequencies). The spheres are randomly distributed in each phantom. The attenuation coefficients of spheres and surroundings are nearly identical; thus, compromising shadowing or enhancement distal to spheres does not occur. Reproducibility results are given for pairs of independent data sets involving eight different combinations of scanner, transducer and console settings. The following comparison results are also reported: (i) only the selected frequency differs; (ii) transducers and scan parameters are nearly the same but manufacturers differ; (iii) ordinary B-scanning, spatial compounding and tissue harmonic imaging are addressed. The phantoms and software promise to be valuable tools for scanning system and setup comparisons and for acceptance testing.
Copyright © 2014 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Detection; Imaging performance; Low-echo spheres; Phantom; Software

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24768482      PMCID: PMC4217281          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  5 in total

1.  Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements.

Authors:  E L Madsen; F Dong; G R Frank; B S Garra; K A Wear; T Wilson; J A Zagzebski; H L Miller; K K Shung; S H Wang; E J Feleppa; T Liu; W D O'Brien; K A Topp; N T Sanghvi; A V Zaitsev; T J Hall; J B Fowlkes; O D Kripfgans; J G Miller
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Improved method for determining resolution zones in ultrasound phantoms with spherical simulated lesions.

Authors:  J M Kofler; E L Madsen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Association of automated and human observer lesion detecting ability using phantoms.

Authors:  James M Kofler; Mary J Lindstrom; Frederick Kelcz; Ernest L Madsen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Objective analysis of ultrasound images by use of a computational observer.

Authors:  H Lopez; M H Loew; D J Goodenough
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Liquid or solid ultrasonically tissue-mimicking materials with very low scatter.

Authors:  E L Madsen; G R Frank; F Dong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.998

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the low-contrast detectability of two ultrasound systems using a grayscale phantom.

Authors:  Robert Lorentsson; Nasser Hosseini; Jan-Olof Johansson; Wiebke Rosenberg; Benny Stenborg; Lars Gunnar Månsson; Magnus Båth
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.