Literature DB >> 24768240

Three-year treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt comparison study.

Keith Barton1, William J Feuer2, Donald L Budenz3, Joyce Schiffman2, Vital P Costa4, David G Godfrey5, Yvonne M Buys6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare 3-year outcomes and complications of the Ahmed FP7 Glaucoma Valve (AGV) (New World Medical, Cucamonga, CA) and the Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant (BGI) 101-350 (Abbott Medical Optics, Abbott Park, IL) for the treatment of refractory glaucoma.
DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 276 patients: 143 in the AGV group and 133 in the BGI group.
METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 85 years with refractory glaucoma and intraocular pressures (IOPs) ≥ 18 mmHg in whom an aqueous shunt was planned were randomized to an AGV or a BGI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The IOP, visual acuity (VA), supplemental medical therapy, complications, and failure (IOP >21 mmHg or not reduced by 20% from baseline, IOP <5 mmHg, reoperation for glaucoma or removal of implant, or loss of light perception vision).
RESULTS: At 3 years, IOP (mean ± standard deviation) was 14.3 ± ± 4.7 mmHg (AGV group) and 13.1 ± 4.5 mmHg (BGI group) (P = 0.086) on 2.0 ± 1.4 and 1.5 ± 1.4 glaucoma medications, respectively (P = 0.020). The cumulative probabilities of failure were 31.3% (standard error [SE], 4.0%) (AGV) and 32.3% (4.2%) (BGI) (P = 0.99). Postoperative complications associated with reoperation or vision loss of >2 Snellen lines occurred in 24 patients (22%) (AGV) and 38 patients (36%) (BGI) (P = 0.035). The mean change in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA at 3 years was similar (AGV: 0.21 ± 0.88, BGI: 0.26 ± 0.74) in the 2 treatment groups at 3 years (P = 0.66). The cumulative proportion of patients (SE) undergoing reoperation for glaucoma before the 3-year postoperative time point was 14.5% (3.0%) in the AGV group compared with 7.6% (2.4%) in the BGI group (P = 0.053, log rank). The relative risk of reoperation for glaucoma in the AGV group was 2.1 times that of the BGI group (95% confidence interval, 1.0-4.8; P = 0.045, Cox proportional hazards regression).
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the AGV was associated with the need for significantly greater adjunctive medication to achieve equal success relative to implantation of the BGI and resulted in a greater relative risk of reoperation for glaucoma. More subjects experienced serious postoperative complications in the BGI group than in the AGV group.
Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24768240      PMCID: PMC4153410          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  19 in total

1.  The Ahmed shunt versus the Baerveldt shunt for refractory glaucoma II: longer-term outcomes from a single surgeon.

Authors:  James C Tsai; Cameron C Johnson; Jeffrey A Kammer; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Steven J Gedde; Leon W Herndon; James D Brandt; Donald L Budenz; William J Feuer; Joyce C Schiffman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt study: design, baseline patient characteristics, and intraoperative complications.

Authors:  Panos G Christakis; James C Tsai; David Zurakowski; Jeffrey W Kalenak; Louis B Cantor; Iqbal I K Ahmed
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  The Ahmed shunt versus the Baerveldt shunt for refractory glaucoma: a single-surgeon comparison of outcome.

Authors:  James C Tsai; Cameron C Johnson; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Experience with the use of Baerveldt and Ahmed glaucoma drainage implants in an Asian population.

Authors:  Jenn-C Wang; Jovina L S See; Paul T K Chew
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Which is better? One or two? A randomized clinical trial of single-plate versus double-plate Molteno implantation for glaucomas in aphakia and pseudophakia.

Authors:  D K Heuer; M A Lloyd; D A Abrams; G Baerveldt; D S Minckler; M B Lee; J F Martone
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Baerveldt-350 implant versus Ahmed valve for refractory glaucoma: a case-controlled comparison.

Authors:  Hasan M Syed; Simon K Law; Sok H Nam; Gang Li; Joseph Caprioli; Anne Coleman
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Glaucoma drainage implants: a critical comparison of types.

Authors:  Kenneth S Schwartz; Richard K Lee; Steven J Gedde
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Five-year follow-up of the Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study. The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Pro-inflammatory cytokines in glaucomatous aqueous and encysted Molteno implant blebs and their relationship to pressure.

Authors:  Jeffrey Freedman; Pavel Iserovich
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  23 in total

1.  Five-year treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt comparison study.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Keith Barton; Steven J Gedde; William J Feuer; Joyce Schiffman; Vital P Costa; David G Godfrey; Yvonne M Buys
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 2.  Aqueous shunts for glaucoma.

Authors:  Victoria L Tseng; Anne L Coleman; Melinda Y Chang; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-28

3.  Diplopia in Medically and Surgically Treated Patients with Glaucoma.

Authors:  Philip Y Sun; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes; Cheryl L Khanna
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  The Choice of Drainage Device in Complicated Glaucomas: Comparing Ahmed and Baerveldt Implants.

Authors:  Marilita M Moschos; Eirini Nitoda; Nikolaos Gouliopoulos; Sophia Androudi; Christos Damaskos; Konstantinos Laios; Eleni Bagkli; Nikolaos Garmpis; George Kitsos
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Trabeculectomy ab interno with the Trabectome® as a therapeutic option for uveitic secondary glaucoma.

Authors:  Alexandra Anton; Sonja Heinzelmann; Thomas Neß; Jan Lübke; Matthias Neuburger; Jens F Jordan; Thomas Wecker
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  24-Month Outcomes of Ahmed ClearPath® Glaucoma Drainage Device for Refractory Glaucoma.

Authors:  Syril Dorairaj; Leticia A Checo; Isabella V Wagner; Richard D Ten Hulzen; Abhimanyu S Ahuja
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-13

7.  Postoperative Complications in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study During Five Years of Follow-up.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; William J Feuer; Keith Barton; Joyce Schiffman; Vital P Costa; David G Godfrey; Yvonne M Buys
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation for Refractory Glaucoma in a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.

Authors:  Ricardo Yuji Abe; Carla Melo Tavares; Rui Barroso Schimiti; José Paulo Cabral Vasconcellos; Vital Paulino Costa
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Distinctive and pervasive alterations in aqueous humor protein composition following different types of glaucoma surgery.

Authors:  Cyril Rosenfeld; Marianne O Price; Xianyin Lai; Frank A Witzmann; Francis W Price
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  Results of Trabectome Surgery Following Failed Glaucoma Tube Shunt Implantation: Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sameh Mosaed; Garrick Chak; Asghar Haider; Ken Y Lin; Don S Minckler
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.