Niansong Ye1, Hu Long1, Junjie Xue1, Sheng Wang1, Xin Yang1, Wenli Lai2. 1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 2. Professor and Vice Chair, Department of Orthodontics, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Electronic address: wenlilai@hotmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aims were to examine the influence of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-scanned voxels and segmentation threshold settings on the accuracy of surface-based registration. STUDY DESIGN: The samples were obtained from 10 adults. Each laser-scanned model was registered into a CBCT model by use of the iterative closest point algorithm. We calculated the shell-to-shell deviations between the 2 models and evaluated the results with color-mapping methods. The centroid coordinates were used to calculate the positional differences. Thresholds were expressed in relative Hounsfield units (RHU). RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in shell-to-shell deviations between the 0.20-mm-voxel group and the 0.40-mm-voxel group (P < .001). There was a statistically significant difference in anteroposterior and superoinferior directions between the 200- and 700-RHU threshold models in 2 groups (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the accuracy of the integration of laser-scanned dental models into CBCT images is higher with a high-RHU threshold setting in 0.20- and 0.40-mm voxel sizes.
OBJECTIVE: The aims were to examine the influence of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-scanned voxels and segmentation threshold settings on the accuracy of surface-based registration. STUDY DESIGN: The samples were obtained from 10 adults. Each laser-scanned model was registered into a CBCT model by use of the iterative closest point algorithm. We calculated the shell-to-shell deviations between the 2 models and evaluated the results with color-mapping methods. The centroid coordinates were used to calculate the positional differences. Thresholds were expressed in relative Hounsfield units (RHU). RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in shell-to-shell deviations between the 0.20-mm-voxel group and the 0.40-mm-voxel group (P < .001). There was a statistically significant difference in anteroposterior and superoinferior directions between the 200- and 700-RHU threshold models in 2 groups (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the accuracy of the integration of laser-scanned dental models into CBCT images is higher with a high-RHU threshold setting in 0.20- and 0.40-mm voxel sizes.
Authors: Hui-Rong Zhang; Le-Feng Yin; Yan-Li Liu; Li-Yi Yan; Ning Wang; Gang Liu; Xiao-Li An; Bin Liu Journal: Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi Date: 2018-04-01