Literature DB >> 24767633

Biosimilars in oncology: from development to clinical practice.

Katherine H Rak Tkaczuk1, Ira Allen Jacobs2.   

Abstract

Biologics play an integral role in the treatment of cancer not only for their therapeutic effects and ability to improve outcomes, but also as supportive care agents. Biologics are more complex to manufacture and take longer to bring to market. Because biologics are considerably more costly than small-molecule drugs, their use has placed an increasing economic demand on healthcare systems worldwide. Biosimilars are designed to be highly similar to existing branded biologics, but because biologics cannot be exactly copied, biosimilars should not be referred to as generic, exact versions of the innovator biologic. Biosimilars have the potential to increase access and provide lower cost options for cancer care as patent protection for some of the most widely used biologics begins to expire. Regulatory requirements for biosimilars are evolving, as are global harmonization and/or standardization strategies that can facilitate their robust clinical development. This review highlights critical factors involved with the integration of biosimilars into oncology treatment paradigms and practices. Clinicians will likely seek out practice guidelines and position statements from established scientific societies to help evaluate key information regarding biosimilars, such as efficacy, safety, comparability, and interchangeability with the reference biologic. Automatic substitution, nomenclature, extrapolation of clinical data from one indication to another, as well as parameters for ongoing pharmacovigilance are evolving considerations. Education of physicians and other healthcare providers, payers, and patients about biosimilars may facilitate informed decision making, promote acceptance of biosimilars into clinical practice, increase accessibility, and expedite associated health and economic benefits.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24767633     DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  13 in total

1.  The evolving role of biosimilars in haematology-oncology: a practical perspective.

Authors:  Pere Gascon
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Are Biosimilars the Future of Oncology and Haematology?

Authors:  Pier Luigi Zinzani; Martin Dreyling; William Gradishar; Marc Andre; Francisco J Esteva; Suliman Boulos; Eva González Barca; Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  The evolution of biosimilars in oncology, with a focus on trastuzumab.

Authors:  N A Nixon; M B Hannouf; S Verma
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Novel Treatments for Rare Cancers: The U.S. Orphan Drug Act Is Delivering-A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Clemens Stockklausner; Anette Lampert; Georg F Hoffmann; Markus Ries
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-03-28

5.  Novel treatments for rare rheumatologic disorders: analysis of the impact of 30 years of the US orphan drug act.

Authors:  Thomas Lutz; Anette Lampert; Georg F Hoffmann; Markus Ries
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 6.  Methodological issues in the choice among different drugs approved for the same therapeutic indication: a position paper by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

Authors:  Massimo Di Maio; Paolo Bruzzi; Francesco Perrone; Valter Torri; Filippo Montemurro; Marcello Tiseo; Enrico Vasile
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-12-12

7.  Assessing physician and patient acceptance of infliximab biosimilars in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis across Germany.

Authors:  John Waller; Emma Sullivan; James Piercy; Christopher M Black; Sumesh Kachroo
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Assessing gastroenterologist and patient acceptance of biosimilars in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease across Germany.

Authors:  Emma Sullivan; James Piercy; John Waller; Christopher M Black; Sumesh Kachroo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Meta-analysis of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Results of 3 Phase 1 Studies with Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  Sreekanth Gattu; Jessie Wang; Anne Bellon; Celine Schelcher; Roumen Nakov; Ramin Arani
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev       Date:  2021-08-04

10.  A Comparison of Proposed Biosimilar LA-EP2006 and Reference Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Neutropenia in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Pegfilgrastim Randomized Oncology (Supportive Care) Trial to Evaluate Comparative Treatment (PROTECT-2), a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

Authors:  Kimberly Blackwell; Roman Donskih; C Michael Jones; Allen Nixon; Maria J Vidal; Roumen Nakov; Pritibha Singh; Gregor Schaffar; Pere Gascón; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.