Literature DB >> 24766583

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm-growing bacteria.

M D Macià1, E Rojo-Molinero, A Oliver.   

Abstract

Biofilms are organized bacterial communities embedded in an extracellular polymeric matrix attached to living or abiotic surfaces. The development of biofilms is currently recognized as one of the most relevant drivers of persistent infections. Among them, chronic respiratory infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients is probably the most intensively studied. The lack of correlation between conventional susceptibility test results and therapeutic success in chronic infections is probably a consequence of the use of planktonically growing instead of biofilm-growing bacteria. Therefore, several in vitro models to evaluate antimicrobial activity on biofilms have been implemented over the last decade. Microtitre plate-based assays, the Calgary device, substratum suspending reactors and the flow cell system are some of the most used in vitro biofilm models for susceptibility studies. Likewise, new pharmacodynamic parameters, including minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration, minimal biofilm-eradication concentration, biofilm bactericidal concentration, and biofilm-prevention concentration, have been defined in recent years to quantify antibiotic activity in biofilms. Using these parameters, several studies have shown very significant quantitative and qualitative differences for the effects of most antibiotics when acting on planktonic or biofilm bacteria. Nevertheless, standardization of the procedures, parameters and breakpoints, by official agencies, is needed before they are implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories for routine susceptibility testing. Research efforts should also be directed to obtaining a deeper understanding of biofilm resistance mechanisms, the evaluation of optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models for biofilm growth, and correlation with clinical outcome.
© 2014 The Authors Clinical Microbiology and Infection © 2014 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; antimicrobial resistance; biofilm; pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters; susceptibility testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24766583     DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  106 in total

1.  Use of Calgary and Microfluidic BioFlux Systems To Test the Activity of Fosfomycin and Tobramycin Alone and in Combination against Cystic Fibrosis Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.

Authors:  María Díez-Aguilar; María Isabel Morosini; Emin Köksal; Antonio Oliver; Miquel Ekkelenkamp; Rafael Cantón
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Optimization of Antibiotic Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: Current Evidences, Gaps in Knowledge and Future Directions.

Authors:  Charlotte Roy; Manon Launay; Sophie Magréault; Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus; Vincent Jullien
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Luminescent Nanosensors for Ratiometric Monitoring of Three-Dimensional Oxygen Gradients in Laboratory and Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms.

Authors:  Megan P Jewell; Anne A Galyean; J Kirk Harris; Edith T Zemanick; Kevin J Cash
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Targeting S. mutans biofilms: a perspective on preventing dental caries.

Authors:  Amber M Scharnow; Amy E Solinski; William M Wuest
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 3.597

5.  Metal ions weaken the hydrophobicity and antibiotic resistance of Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610 biofilms.

Authors:  Carolina Falcón García; Martin Kretschmer; Carlos N Lozano-Andrade; Markus Schönleitner; Anna Dragoŝ; Ákos T Kovács; Oliver Lieleg
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 7.290

Review 6.  Options and Limitations in Clinical Investigation of Bacterial Biofilms.

Authors:  Maria Magana; Christina Sereti; Anastasios Ioannidis; Courtney A Mitchell; Anthony R Ball; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou; Michael R Hamblin; Maria Hadjifrangiskou; George P Tegos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Community Composition Determines Activity of Antibiotics against Multispecies Biofilms.

Authors:  Sarah Tavernier; Aurélie Crabbé; Mayram Hacioglu; Liesbeth Stuer; Silke Henry; Petra Rigole; Inne Dhondt; Tom Coenye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on biofilm growth dynamics and their heterogeneous response to antibiotic challenge.

Authors:  Lakshmi Machineni
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Honokiol-Inspired Analogs as Inhibitors of Oral Bacteria.

Authors:  Amy E Solinski; Cristian Ochoa; Young Eun Lee; Thomas Paniak; Marisa C Kozlowski; William M Wuest
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.084

10.  In Vivo Gentamicin Susceptibility Test for Prevention of Bacterial Biofilms in Bone Tissue and on Implants.

Authors:  Louise Kruse Jensen; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Kasper N Kragh; Bent Aalbæk; Nicole Lind Henriksen; Sophie Amalie Blirup; Karen Pankoke; Andreas Petersen; Henrik Elvang Jensen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.