STUDY DESIGN: Intraexaminer and interexaminer, within- and between-day reliability study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the intraexaminer and interexaminer procedural reliability of ultrasound imaging (USI) thickness measurements of the lumbar multifidus muscle at rest and during a contralateral lower-limb lift (CLL) between older (60-85 years of age) and younger (18-40 years of age) adults. BACKGROUND: Among younger adults, USI has been shown to be reliable and valid for assessing multifidus thickness. Older adults present with age-related changes that may impact assessment. To our knowledge, no USI studies have focused on establishing reliability for multifidus thickness assessments in older adults. METHODS: Two examiners performed assessments of lumbar multifidus thickness at rest and during a CLL in 30 older and 31 younger adults. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval, standard error of measurement, 95% minimal detectable change for resting and during the CLL, and percent thickness change were calculated. RESULTS: Within-day interexaminer procedural reliability for multifidus thickness measurements was similar among younger (ICC = 0.90-0.92) and older adults (ICC = 0.86-0.90), as was between-day intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability (younger adults, ICC = 0.84-0.94; older adults, ICC = 0.86-0.93). Throughout, estimates of percent thickness change were inconsistent (ICC = 0.31-0.86), and standard errors of measurement and minimal detectable changes were larger for older adults. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound imaging reliability for measurements of multifidus thickness at rest and during a CLL among older adults is consistent with previously published findings for younger adults. Among older adults, it may be preferable to have a single examiner conduct USI assessments.
STUDY DESIGN: Intraexaminer and interexaminer, within- and between-day reliability study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the intraexaminer and interexaminer procedural reliability of ultrasound imaging (USI) thickness measurements of the lumbar multifidus muscle at rest and during a contralateral lower-limb lift (CLL) between older (60-85 years of age) and younger (18-40 years of age) adults. BACKGROUND: Among younger adults, USI has been shown to be reliable and valid for assessing multifidus thickness. Older adults present with age-related changes that may impact assessment. To our knowledge, no USI studies have focused on establishing reliability for multifidus thickness assessments in older adults. METHODS: Two examiners performed assessments of lumbar multifidus thickness at rest and during a CLL in 30 older and 31 younger adults. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval, standard error of measurement, 95% minimal detectable change for resting and during the CLL, and percent thickness change were calculated. RESULTS: Within-day interexaminer procedural reliability for multifidus thickness measurements was similar among younger (ICC = 0.90-0.92) and older adults (ICC = 0.86-0.90), as was between-day intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability (younger adults, ICC = 0.84-0.94; older adults, ICC = 0.86-0.93). Throughout, estimates of percent thickness change were inconsistent (ICC = 0.31-0.86), and standard errors of measurement and minimal detectable changes were larger for older adults. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound imaging reliability for measurements of multifidus thickness at rest and during a CLL among older adults is consistent with previously published findings for younger adults. Among older adults, it may be preferable to have a single examiner conduct USI assessments.
Authors: Pradeep Suri; Dan K Kiely; Suzanne G Leveille; Walter R Frontera; Jonathan F Bean Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jackie L Whittaker; Deydre S Teyhen; James M Elliott; Katy Cook; Helene M Langevin; Haldis H Dahl; Maria Stokes Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Shane L Koppenhaver; Eric C Parent; Deydre S Teyhen; Jeffrey J Hebert; Julie M Fritz Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Jaclyn M Sions; Emma H Beisheim; Mark A Hoggarth; James M Elliott; Gregory E Hicks; Ryan T Pohlig; Mayank Seth Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo; Michael O Harris-Love; Iva Miljkovic; Maren S Fragala; Brian W Anthony; Todd M Manini Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Willemke Nijholt; Aldo Scafoglieri; Harriët Jager-Wittenaar; Johannes S M Hobbelen; Cees P van der Schans Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 12.910