Literature DB >> 24764865

2-Bromo-4-phenyl-1,3-thia-zole.

Alexander S Bunev1, Yana I Rudakova1, Vladimir E Statsyuk1, Gennady I Ostapenko1, Victor N Khrustalev2.   

Abstract

In the title mol-ecule, C9H6BrNS, the planes of the 2-bromo-1,3-thia-zole and phenyl rings are inclined at 7.45 (10)° with respect to each other. In the crystal, mol-ecules related by a centre of symmetry are held together via π-π inter-actions, with a short distance of 3.815 (2) Å between the centroids of the five- and six-membered rings. The crystal packing exhibits short inter-molecular S⋯Br contacts of 3.5402 (6) Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24764865      PMCID: PMC3998304          DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For syntheses and properties of compounds containing a thia­zole fragment, see: Kelly & Lang (1995 ▶); Nicolaou et al. (1999 ▶); Cosford et al. (2003 ▶); Fyfe et al. (2004 ▶); Hamill et al. (2005 ▶). For the crystal structures of related compounds, see: Abbenante et al. (1996 ▶); Zhao et al. (2011 ▶); Ghabbour, Chia et al. (2012 ▶); Ghabbour, Kadi et al. (2012 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C9H6BrNS M = 240.12 Monoclinic, a = 5.8934 (3) Å b = 10.6591 (6) Å c = 13.8697 (7) Å β = 90.812 (1)° V = 871.18 (8) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 4.89 mm−1 T = 120 K 0.15 × 0.12 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003 ▶) T min = 0.527, T max = 0.591 12144 measured reflections 2780 independent reflections 2258 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.045

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.029 wR(F 2) = 0.068 S = 1.03 2780 reflections 109 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.51 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440Isup3.cml CCDC reference: Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H6BrNSF(000) = 472
Mr = 240.12Dx = 1.831 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 3185 reflections
a = 5.8934 (3) Åθ = 2.4–29.5°
b = 10.6591 (6) ŵ = 4.89 mm1
c = 13.8697 (7) ÅT = 120 K
β = 90.812 (1)°Prism, yellow
V = 871.18 (8) Å30.15 × 0.12 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer2780 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine–focus sealed tube2258 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.045
φ and ω scansθmax = 31.0°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003)h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.527, Tmax = 0.591k = −15→15
12144 measured reflectionsl = −20→19
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.068H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0323P)2 + 0.1245P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2780 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
109 parametersΔρmax = 0.40 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.51 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.21824 (3)0.90020 (2)0.576233 (15)0.02238 (7)
S1−0.24024 (8)0.75866 (5)0.55984 (4)0.01975 (11)
C20.0322 (3)0.77659 (19)0.52049 (14)0.0165 (4)
N30.0960 (3)0.70330 (16)0.45150 (11)0.0161 (3)
C4−0.0825 (3)0.62475 (17)0.42443 (14)0.0144 (4)
C5−0.2768 (3)0.64278 (19)0.47549 (14)0.0178 (4)
H5−0.41350.59720.46550.021*
C6−0.0500 (3)0.53485 (18)0.34463 (14)0.0151 (4)
C7−0.2155 (3)0.4453 (2)0.32167 (14)0.0184 (4)
H7−0.35080.44190.35800.022*
C8−0.1849 (4)0.3613 (2)0.24652 (14)0.0214 (4)
H8−0.29880.30090.23180.026*
C90.0134 (4)0.3655 (2)0.19254 (15)0.0213 (4)
H90.03540.30800.14110.026*
C100.1778 (4)0.4544 (2)0.21484 (15)0.0208 (4)
H100.31300.45760.17840.025*
C110.1471 (3)0.53900 (19)0.28978 (14)0.0174 (4)
H110.26050.59990.30380.021*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.02065 (11)0.02080 (11)0.02561 (12)−0.00021 (8)−0.00253 (8)−0.00725 (8)
S10.0181 (2)0.0210 (3)0.0202 (2)0.00233 (19)0.00358 (19)−0.00361 (19)
C20.0156 (9)0.0158 (9)0.0181 (9)0.0006 (7)−0.0012 (7)−0.0013 (7)
N30.0167 (8)0.0160 (8)0.0155 (8)−0.0008 (6)−0.0005 (6)−0.0006 (6)
C40.0162 (9)0.0129 (9)0.0142 (8)0.0009 (7)−0.0008 (7)0.0015 (7)
C50.0173 (9)0.0173 (9)0.0190 (10)0.0002 (7)0.0009 (7)−0.0011 (8)
C60.0187 (9)0.0137 (9)0.0129 (8)0.0020 (7)−0.0013 (7)0.0015 (7)
C70.0194 (9)0.0182 (9)0.0176 (9)−0.0013 (8)0.0002 (7)0.0010 (8)
C80.0264 (10)0.0180 (10)0.0198 (10)−0.0019 (8)−0.0054 (8)−0.0004 (8)
C90.0307 (11)0.0180 (10)0.0153 (9)0.0045 (8)−0.0019 (8)−0.0026 (7)
C100.0224 (10)0.0225 (10)0.0175 (9)0.0041 (8)0.0028 (8)0.0006 (8)
C110.0184 (9)0.0165 (9)0.0172 (9)−0.0013 (7)0.0019 (7)−0.0004 (7)
Br1—C21.874 (2)C7—C81.388 (3)
S1—C51.713 (2)C7—H70.9500
S1—C21.714 (2)C8—C91.398 (3)
C2—N31.295 (2)C8—H80.9500
N3—C41.392 (2)C9—C101.388 (3)
C4—C51.368 (3)C9—H90.9500
C4—C61.478 (3)C10—C111.390 (3)
C5—H50.9500C10—H100.9500
C6—C111.398 (3)C11—H110.9500
C6—C71.398 (3)
C5—S1—C288.40 (10)C8—C7—H7119.5
N3—C2—S1116.81 (15)C6—C7—H7119.5
N3—C2—Br1123.68 (15)C7—C8—C9120.0 (2)
S1—C2—Br1119.49 (11)C7—C8—H8120.0
C2—N3—C4109.64 (17)C9—C8—H8120.0
C5—C4—N3114.24 (17)C10—C9—C8119.28 (19)
C5—C4—C6126.63 (18)C10—C9—H9120.4
N3—C4—C6119.11 (17)C8—C9—H9120.4
C4—C5—S1110.91 (15)C9—C10—C11120.80 (19)
C4—C5—H5124.5C9—C10—H10119.6
S1—C5—H5124.5C11—C10—H10119.6
C11—C6—C7118.68 (18)C10—C11—C6120.30 (19)
C11—C6—C4120.27 (17)C10—C11—H11119.9
C7—C6—C4121.05 (17)C6—C11—H11119.9
C8—C7—C6120.92 (19)
C5—S1—C2—N3−0.65 (17)C5—C4—C6—C7−8.5 (3)
C5—S1—C2—Br1178.28 (13)N3—C4—C6—C7173.20 (18)
S1—C2—N3—C40.5 (2)C11—C6—C7—C80.5 (3)
Br1—C2—N3—C4−178.35 (13)C4—C6—C7—C8179.78 (19)
C2—N3—C4—C5−0.1 (2)C6—C7—C8—C90.0 (3)
C2—N3—C4—C6178.41 (17)C7—C8—C9—C10−0.2 (3)
N3—C4—C5—S1−0.4 (2)C8—C9—C10—C11−0.1 (3)
C6—C4—C5—S1−178.74 (16)C9—C10—C11—C60.6 (3)
C2—S1—C5—C40.56 (16)C7—C6—C11—C10−0.8 (3)
C5—C4—C6—C11170.74 (19)C4—C6—C11—C10179.93 (18)
N3—C4—C6—C11−7.5 (3)
  7 in total

1.  3-[(2-Methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]-pyridine: a potent and highly selective metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 receptor antagonist with anxiolytic activity.

Authors:  Nicholas D P Cosford; Lida Tehrani; Jeffrey Roppe; Edwin Schweiger; Nicholas D Smith; Jeffrey Anderson; Linda Bristow; Jesse Brodkin; Xiaohui Jiang; Ian McDonald; Sara Rao; Mark Washburn; Mark A Varney
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Synthesis, characterization, and first successful monkey imaging studies of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5) PET radiotracers.

Authors:  Terence G Hamill; Stephen Krause; Christine Ryan; Celine Bonnefous; Steve Govek; T Jon Seiders; Nicholas D P Cosford; Jeffrey Roppe; Ted Kamenecka; Shil Patel; Raymond E Gibson; Sandra Sanabria; Kerry Riffel; Waisi Eng; Christopher King; Xiaoqing Yang; Mitchell D Green; Stacey S O'Malley; Richard Hargreaves; H Donald Burns
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Total synthesis of epothilone E and related side-chain modified analogues via a Stille coupling based strategy.

Authors:  K C Nicolaou; N P King; M R Finlay; Y He; F Roschangar; D Vourloumis; H Vallberg; F Sarabia; S Ninkovic; D Hepworth
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  2-Chloro-5-chloro-meth-yl-1,3-thia-zole.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Zhao; Wei-Hua Cheng; Zhao-Sheng Cai
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-05-25

6.  1-(5-Bromo-4-phenyl-1,3-thia-zol-2-yl)pyrrolidin-2-one.

Authors:  Hazem A Ghabbour; Adnan A Kadi; Hussein I El-Subbagh; Tze Shyang Chia; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-05-16

7.  5-Bromo-4-(3,4-dimeth-oxy-phen-yl)thia-zol-2-amine.

Authors:  Hazem A Ghabbour; Tze Shyang Chia; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-05-05
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Crystal structures of ethyl {2-[4-(4-iso-propyl-phen-yl)thia-zol-2-yl]phen-yl}carbamate and ethyl {2-[4-(3-nitro-phen-yl)thia-zol-2-yl]phen-yl}carbamate.

Authors:  Elena V Sukhonosova; Sergey A Sokov; Gennady I Ostapenko; Alexander S Bunev; Pavel V Dorovatovskii; Yan V Zubavichus; Victor N Khrustalev
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2016-08-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.