| Literature DB >> 24764465 |
Saifullah Khan1, Sobia Ahsan Halim2, Muhammad Kashif1, Almas Jabeen2, Muhmammad Asif2, Muhammad Ahmed Mesaik2, Zaheer Ul-Haq2, Ahsana Dar3, Muhammad Iqbal Choudhary3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plant Biotransformation is one of the tools for structural modifications of the organic substrate of low, moderate or high biological value utilizing plant cultured cells, these modifications of organic structures may lead to biologically augmented products and which may be ultimately substantial in cure or improvement of various morbidities and diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-cancer activity; Anti-inflammatory activity; Biotransformation; Molecular docking studies
Year: 2013 PMID: 24764465 PMCID: PMC3874778 DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
IC effect of tested compounds on oxidative burst of whole blood, isolated PMNs, T-cell proliferation and IL-2 cytokine
| 1 | >333.33 | >166.67 | >166.67 | >166.67 |
| 2 | >331.13 | >165.56 | <10.33 | 16.89 ± 1.32 |
| 3 | >328.95 | >164.47 | 42.11 ± 11.51 | 49.34 ± 1.32 |
| Control Aa | 11.2 ± 1.9 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | - | - |
| Control Bb | - | - | 0.2 | <0.5 |
aIbuprofen; bPrednisolone.
Figure 1Effect of compounds on phytohemagglutinin (PHA), T-cell proliferation and IL-2 production. The bar graph represents effects of various concentrations of the test compounds 1–3 after 72 h incubation with peripheral blood mononuclear cells at 37°C. Effect of compounds on T-cell proliferation response is compared with non-proliferated (+ve) and proliferated (−ve) cells (a). The bar graph represent effects of various concentrations of the test compounds (1–3) on production of IL-2 compared with (+ve) and without (−ve) PHA induced IL-2 production. Each bar represents the mean value of triplicate reading ± SD (b).
Growth inhibition induced by transformed compounds against human lung cancer cell line (NCI-H460)
| 1 | 28.3 ± 2.72 | NDa |
| 2 | 22.5 ± 4.15 | 60 ± 9.2 |
| 3 | ND | ND |
| Doxorubicin (control) | 0.08 ± 0.02 | --- |
ND: Values could not be determined indicates <50% inhibition of cell growth at maximum dose (100 μM) tested.
Figure 2The chemical structure of compound 4. Superimposed view of docked conformation of compound 4 (RMSD 0.7 Å), shown in blue (a) and the reference ligand shown in yellow (b).
Scheme 1Biotransformation of dianabol (1) by cell suspension cultures of , and resulting metabolites 2 and 3.
Figure 3The docked orientations of Compound 1 (Orange), 2 (Green) and 3 (Pink) in the ligand binding site of IL-2. The interacting amino acids are shown in Purple stick.
Figure 4The binding mode analysis of Compound 1 (a), 2 (b) and 3 (c). The interaction of compounds 1–3 with Arg38 is shown. Hydrogen bonds are displayed in green dash lines and the distances are shown in red colour.
Figure 5The comparison of hydrogen bonding pattern of compounds 1–3 with reference compound 4. Hydrogen bonding of reference compound with Arg38 (a) and Hydrogen bonding of compound 1-3 with Arg38 (b).
Docking Energies and H-Bond Distances with the surrounding residues
| 1 | −6.7 | ----- | ------ | ------ |
| 2 | −10.8 | 2.8 (NH2ϵ) and 2.2 (NH2ŋ2) | ------ | ------ |
| 3 | −9.8 | 2.9 Å (NH2ϵ) and 3.5 Å (NH2ŋ2) | ------ | ------ |
| 4 | −26.0 | ------ | 2.9 Å (NH2) | 2.8 Å (O1) and 3.0 Å (O2) |
| Prednisolone | −28.2 | ----- | 2.44 | 3.34 |