Literature DB >> 24763296

Why don't nurses consistently take patient respiratory rates?

Helen Ansell1, Alannah Meyer2, Shona Thompson3.   

Abstract

This is an investigation into nurses' practice of when they would not take and record a patient's respiratory rate. It reports results of qualitative, descriptive research involving interviews with ten ward nurses from three hospitals in New Zealand. Results affirm that, despite it being the most sensitive vital sign for managing patients, nurses acknowledged circumstances in which respiratory rate taking was missed. Reasons were complex and, contrary to expectations, not always associated with the introduction of technology to record other vital signs. Time pressures, work interruptions and rationalised judgements made by experienced nurses all contributed to incidences of missed respiratory rate taking. It is concluded that patient respiratory rate measures do not seem to be highly valued, calling into questions nurses' level of understanding of respiratory physiology, as well as the extent to which intuitive nursing practice is supported by critical analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24763296     DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.8.414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nurs        ISSN: 0966-0461


  4 in total

1.  Frequency of vital sign measurement among intubated patients in the general ward and nurses' attitudes toward vital sign measurement.

Authors:  Tadashi Kamio; Ayako Kajiwara; Yusuke Iizuka; Junji Shiotsuka; Masamitsu Sanui
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2018-10-15

Review 2.  A review of the literature on the accuracy, strengths, and limitations of visual, thoracic impedance, and electrocardiographic methods used to measure respiratory rate in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Linda K Bawua; Christine Miaskowski; Xiao Hu; George W Rodway; Michele M Pelter
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Early identification of sepsis in hospital inpatients by ward nurses increases 30-day survival.

Authors:  Malvin Torsvik; Lise Tuset Gustad; Arne Mehl; Inger Lise Bangstad; Liv Jorun Vinje; Jan Kristian Damås; Erik Solligård
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Quantitative systematic review: Sources of inaccuracy in manually measured adult respiratory rate data.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Melany J Christofidis; Mark S Horswill; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.057

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.