BACKGROUND: Active transportation (AT) has been associated with positive health outcomes, yet limited research has addressed this with college students, a population at-risk for inactivity. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between AT behavior and objectively measured fitness outcomes. METHODS: A volunteer, convenience sample (n = 299) of college students from a large northeastern university completed a survey about their AT habits to and on campus and psychosocial constructs related to AT and participated in a laboratory-based fitness assessment (cardiovascular endurance, muscular strength and endurance, flexibility, body composition).Off-campus students were dichotomized as nonactive (0-1 AT trips/day) or active travelers (> 1 AT trips/day) to campus; t-tests compared nonactive and active travelers for psychosocial and fitness variables. RESULTS: Students were 56.3% male, 79.2% non-Hispanic White, and primarily living off-campus (87%). Most students (n = 177, 59.2%) reported active travel between classes. Off-campus students were primarily active travelers (76.1%). Active travelers to campus had greater cardiovascular fitness (P = .005), were more flexible (P = .006) and had lower systolic blood pressure (P = .05) compared with nonactive travelers. CONCLUSION: This study documents a relationship between AT behavior and objectively measured fitness among college students and provides a rationale for targeting this behavior as a method for improving health outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Active transportation (AT) has been associated with positive health outcomes, yet limited research has addressed this with college students, a population at-risk for inactivity. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between AT behavior and objectively measured fitness outcomes. METHODS: A volunteer, convenience sample (n = 299) of college students from a large northeastern university completed a survey about their AT habits to and on campus and psychosocial constructs related to AT and participated in a laboratory-based fitness assessment (cardiovascular endurance, muscular strength and endurance, flexibility, body composition).Off-campus students were dichotomized as nonactive (0-1 AT trips/day) or active travelers (> 1 AT trips/day) to campus; t-tests compared nonactive and active travelers for psychosocial and fitness variables. RESULTS: Students were 56.3% male, 79.2% non-Hispanic White, and primarily living off-campus (87%). Most students (n = 177, 59.2%) reported active travel between classes. Off-campus students were primarily active travelers (76.1%). Active travelers to campus had greater cardiovascular fitness (P = .005), were more flexible (P = .006) and had lower systolic blood pressure (P = .05) compared with nonactive travelers. CONCLUSION: This study documents a relationship between AT behavior and objectively measured fitness among college students and provides a rationale for targeting this behavior as a method for improving health outcomes.
Authors: Fernando Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Carlos Cristi-Montero; Carlos Celis-Morales; Danica Escobar-Gómez; Palma Chillón Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Antonio García-Hermoso; Andrea P Quintero; Enrique Hernández; Jorge Enrique Correa-Bautista; Mikel Izquierdo; Alejandra Tordecilla-Sanders; Daniel Prieto-Benavides; Carolina Sandoval-Cuellar; Katherine González-Ruíz; Emilio Villa-González; Robinson Ramírez-Vélez Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Lina Engelen; Erika Bohn-Goldbaum; Melanie Crane; Martin Mackey; Chris Rissel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Zachary C Pope; Daheia J Barr-Anderson; Beth A Lewis; Mark A Pereira; Zan Gao Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Antonio Castillo-Paredes; Natalia Inostroza Jiménez; Maribel Parra-Saldías; Ximena Palma-Leal; José Luis Felipe; Itziar Págola Aldazabal; Ximena Díaz-Martínez; Fernando Rodríguez-Rodríguez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-13 Impact factor: 3.390