Literature DB >> 24762261

Urban liveability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health.

Hannah Badland1, Carolyn Whitzman2, Melanie Lowe3, Melanie Davern4, Lu Aye5, Iain Butterworth6, Dominique Hes7, Billie Giles-Corti8.   

Abstract

It has long been recognised that urban form impacts on health outcomes and their determinants. There is growing interest in creating indicators of liveability to measure progress towards achieving a wide range of policy outcomes, including enhanced health and wellbeing, and reduced inequalities. This review aimed to: 1) bring together the concepts of urban 'liveability' and social determinants of health; 2) synthesise the various liveability indicators developed to date; and 3) assess their quality using a health and wellbeing lens. Between 2011 and 2013, the research team reviewed 114 international academic and policy documents, as well as reports related to urban liveability. Overall, 233 indicators were found. Of these, 61 indicators were regarded as promising, 57 indicators needed further development, and 115 indicators were not useful for our purposes. Eleven domains of liveability were identified that likely contribute to health and wellbeing through the social determinants of health. These were: crime and safety; education; employment and income; health and social services; housing; leisure and culture; local food and other goods; natural environment; public open space; transport; and social cohesion and local democracy. Many of the indicators came from Australian sources; however most remain relevant from a 'global north' perspective. Although many indicators were identified, there was inconsistency in how these domains were measured. Few have been validated to assess their association with health and wellbeing outcomes, and little information was provided for how they should be applied to guide urban policy and practice. There is a substantial opportunity to further develop these measures to create a series of robust and evidence-based liveability indices, which could be linked with existing health and wellbeing data to better inform urban planning policies within Australia and beyond.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Built environment; Indicator; Policy; Review; Social determinants of health; Urban

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24762261     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  26 in total

1.  Healthy Cities of Tomorrow: the Case for Large Scale Built Environment-Health Studies.

Authors:  Chinmoy Sarkar; Chris Webster
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Priorities of Municipal Policy Makers in Relation to Physical Activity and the Built Environment: A Latent Class Analysis.

Authors:  Monica L Wang; Karin Valentine Goins; Milena Anatchkova; Ross C Brownson; Kelly Evenson; Jay Maddock; Kristian E Clausen; Stephenie C Lemon
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2016 May-Jun

Review 3.  Urban health indicators and indices--current status.

Authors:  Richard Rothenberg; Christine Stauber; Scott Weaver; Dajun Dai; Amit Prasad; Megumi Kano
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  'Including health in systems responsible for urban planning': a realist policy analysis research programme.

Authors:  Patrick Harris; Sharon Friel; Andrew Wilson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Community environment, cognitive impairment and dementia in later life: results from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study.

Authors:  Yu-Tzu Wu; A Matthew Prina; Andrew P Jones; Linda E Barnes; Fiona E Matthews; Carol Brayne
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Characteristics and use of urban health indicator tools by municipal built environment policy and decision-makers: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Helen Pineo; Ketevan Glonti; Harry Rutter; Nicole Zimmermann; Paul Wilkinson; Michael Davies
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-13

7.  Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis.

Authors:  Pablo Alberto Sáinz-Ruiz; Javier Sanz-Valero; Vicente Gea-Caballero; Pedro Melo; Tam H Nguyen; Juan Daniel Suárez-Máximo; José Ramón Martínez-Riera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Cost-effectiveness of investing in sidewalks as a means of increasing physical activity: a RESIDE modelling study.

Authors:  J Lennert Veerman; Belen Zapata-Diomedi; Lucy Gunn; Gavin R McCormack; Linda J Cobiac; Ana Maria Mantilla Herrera; Billie Giles-Corti; Alan Shiell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Beyond recidivism: changes in health and social service involvement following exposure to drug treatment court.

Authors:  Stefanie N Rezansoff; Akm Moniruzzaman; Elenore Clark; Julian M Somers
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2015-10-31

10.  Living Near to Attractive Nature? A Well-Being Indicator for Ranking Dutch, Danish, and German Functional Urban Areas.

Authors:  Michiel N Daams; Paolo Veneri
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  2016-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.