| Literature DB >> 24762259 |
Aurora Perez-Cornago, Rocio de la Iglesia, Patricia Lopez-Legarrea, Itziar Abete, Santiago Navas-Carretero, Clara I Lacunza, Francisca Lahortiga, Miguel A Martinez-Gonzalez, J Alfredo Martinez1, M Angeles Zulet.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and depression have become two prevalent diseases worldwide, whose interaction needs further investigation. Dietary treatment for weight loss in patients with MetS may improve depressive manifestations, however, the precise interactive pathways remain uncertain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effects of a hypocaloric diet designed to reduce MetS features on self-perceived depression and the possible underlying factors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24762259 PMCID: PMC4013804 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Figure 1Flowchart of the randomized and controlled dietary intervention for adults with MetS. The 26 volunteers that dropped out did so for personal reasons not related to the study. Abbreviations: BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; MetS, Metabolic Syndrome.
Comparison of the two dietary treatments, control diet and RESMENA diet
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total energy intake, | 2108 ± 69 | 1535 ± 54* | 2279 ± 99 | 1573 ± 72* | 0.105 |
| Proteins, | 95.9 ± 3.5 | 66.9 ± 3.4* | 95.6 ± 3.4 | 79.3 ± 3.4* | 0.012 |
| Carbohydrates, | 187.3 ± 9.8 | 142.6 ± 8.1* | 196.4 ± 11.5 | 138.9 ± 6.2* | 0.579 |
| Lipids, | 94.7 ± 4.3 | 69.1 ± 2.9* | 108.7 ± 5.9 | 67.0 ± 3.8* | 0.026 |
| Fiber, | 21.4 ± 1.8 | 17.8 ± 1.7 | 22.6 ± 1.1 | 19.4 ± 1.2 | 0.748 |
| Glycemic load | 106.6 ± 8.6 | 72.8 ± 5.8* | 112.1 ± 7.4 | 69.7 ± 5.1* | 0.491 |
| ω3 PUFAs , | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.16 | 0.08 ± 0.02* | 0.002 |
| Meal frequency, | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 4.5 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.2 | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 0.100 |
Data are mean ± SEM, n = 60. *Different from baseline in each dietary group, P <0.05; P value: comparison between dietary group differences (6 months-baseline). Abbreviations: ω3 PUFAs, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Anthropometric and biochemical variables in adults with MetS
| | | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight, | 102.8 ± 2.2a | 95.4 ± 2.1b | 94.4 ± 2.2b | < 0.001 | 0.834 | 0.666 |
| BMI, | 36.1 ± 0.6a | 33.5 ± 0.5b | 33.2 ± 0.6b | < 0.001 | 0.997 | 0.474 |
| WC, | 114.2 ± 1.6a | 106.8 ± 1.5b | 105.7 ± 1.6b | < 0.001 | 0.999 | 0.102 |
| DXA measurements | | | | | | |
| Fat mass, | 42.9 ± 1.2a | 37.5 ± 1.2b | 36.3 ± 1.2c | < 0.0011 | 0.469 | 0.432 |
| Muscle mass, | 56.6 ± 1.5a | 54.5 ± 1.4b | 54.8 ± 1.5b | < 0.001 | 0.694 | 0.239 |
| Biochemical variables | | | | | | |
| Cholesterol, | 219 ± 5a | 197 ± 5b | 219 ± 5a | < 0.001 | 0.568 | 0.751 |
| Glucose, | 128 ± 5a | 111 ± 3b | 116 ± 4b | 0.0011 | 0.786 | 0.377 |
| TG, | 195 ± 13a | 146 ± 10b | 154 ± 12b | < 0.0011 | 0.730 | 0.955 |
| FFA, | 0.56 ± 0.21a | 0.52 ± 0.24a,b | 0.47 ± 0.20b | 0.016 | 0.122 | 0.461 |
| CRP, | 4.3 ± 0.7 a | 3.1 ± 0.4a,b | 2.5 ± 0.4b | 0.0051 | 0.597 | 0.183 |
| HOMA index, | 4.9 ± 0.4a | 2.8 ± 0.3b | 3.0 ± 0.4b | < 0.001 | 0.956 | 0.288 |
| Leptin, | 21.5 ± 2.1a | 14.5 ± 1.5c | 17.2 ± 1.9b | < 0.001 | 0.816 | 0.837 |
| Insulin, | 15.4 ± 1.1a | 9.7 ± 0.9b | 9.6 ± 1.0b | < 0.0011 | 0.964 | 0.634 |
| BDI questionnaire | 7.6 ± 0.8a | 4.4 ± 0.6b | 3.8 ± 0.7c | < 0.001 | 0.777 | 0.798 |
| Activity level2 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 0.154 | 0.697 | 0.184 |
Values are mean ± SEM n = 57-60. Effects of time, diet (control diet vs RESMENA diet) and time-diet interactions were analysed with repeated-measures ANOVA or Friedman test. Values in a row with different superscript letters (a, b, c) are significantly different, P < 0.05 by Bonferroni post hoc test, being a > b > c. Abbreviations: BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; FFA, free fatty acids; MetS, Metabolic Syndrome; TG, triglycerides; WC, waist circumference.
1P-value based on non-parametric Friedman test compared the three time points of the study.
2Average daily exercise calculated by twenty-four physical activity questionnaire.
Figure 2Association between the number of MetS components assessed by IDF criteria and the BDI score at baseline. Values are mean ± SEM, n = 60. BDI score divided by somatic and cognitive questions Abbreviations: BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; IDF, International Diabetes Federation.
Figure 3Changes in BDI cognitive and somatic questions scores (6 months – baseline). n = 60. Range from −3 to 3. Subjects with MetS were divided into more (≥median = −7.6 kg) or less (
Figure 4Association between changes in BDI score and changes in body fat (kg). Abbreviations: BDI, Beck Depression Inventory. Adjusted by sex, age and dietary group. Changes (6 months – baseline), n = 60.
Association between changes in BDI score and changes in CRP, leptin and insulin
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRP | | | |
| Unadjusted model | 0.25 | 0.01 to 0.49 | 0.043 |
| Model 1 | 0.27 | 0.03 to 0.51 | 0.029 |
| Model 2 | 0.26 | 0.01 to 0.50 | 0.044 |
| Model 3 | 0.28 | 0.06 to 0.51 | 0.015 |
| Leptin | | | |
| Unadjusted model | 0.18 | 0.07 to 0.29 | 0.002 |
| Model 1 | 0.21 | 0.10 to 0.32 | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 0.22 | 0.08 to 0.36 | 0.012 |
| Model 3 | 0.17 | 0.04 to 0.30 | 0.013 |
| Insulin | | | |
| Unadjusted model | 0.21 | 0.02 to 0.40 | 0.026 |
| Model 1 | 0.25 | 0.07 to 0.42 | 0.006 |
| Model 2 | 0.33 | 0.15 to 0.52 | 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 0.18 | −0.01 to 0.36 | 0.059 |
The table shows B coefficients (95% CI) and p-value. Changes (6 months-baseline), n = 60. Abbreviation: BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Model 1: Adjusted by sex, age and dietary group. Model 2: Model 1 additionally adjusted for changes in activity level. Model 3: Model 1 additionally adjusted for changes in body fat (kg).