| Literature DB >> 24760511 |
Victoria P Le1, Kellie V Stoka, Hiromi Yanagisawa, Jessica E Wagenseil.
Abstract
Abstract The large arteries serve as compliant vessels that store energy during systole and return it during diastole. This function is made possible by the elastic fibers in the arterial wall that are assembled during late embryonic and early postnatal development from various proteins, including fibulin-5. Mice and humans with insufficient amounts of fibulin-5 have reduced arterial compliance as adults. Reduced compliance of the large arteries is correlated with hypertension, reduced cardiac function, and an increased risk of death from cardiac and cardiovascular disease. The goal of this study was to quantify arterial compliance, blood pressure, and left ventricular (LV) function from early postnatal development to young adulthood in fibulin-5 null (Fbln5-/-) mice to determine the effects of reduced arterial compliance during this critical period of elastic fiber assembly. We find that ascending aorta compliance is reduced as early as postnatal day (P) 7 and carotid artery compliance is reduced by P21 in Fbln5-/- mice. We did not find significant increases in systolic blood pressure by P60, but pulse pressures are increased by P21 in Fbln5-/- mice. LV systolic function, as measured by ejection fraction and fractional shortening, is unaffected in Fbln5-/- mice. However, LV diastolic function, as measured by tissue Doppler imaging, is compromised at all ages in Fbln5-/- mice. We propose that Fbln5-/- mice represent a suitable model for further studies to determine mechanistic relationships between arterial compliance and LV diastolic function.Entities:
Keywords: Arterial stiffness; echocardiography; elastin; hypertension; ultrasound
Year: 2014 PMID: 24760511 PMCID: PMC4002237 DOI: 10.1002/phy2.257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Results of the GLM for each variable including independent effects of age, sex, and genotype (GT) and interactions between the independent variables. Significant values (P < 0.05) and good fits to the GLM (R 2 > 0.7) are shown in bold. Two‐tailed t‐tests with unequal variance were performed to compare genotypes at each age when genotype or genotype*age had a significant effect in the GLM. Definitions for each variable are given in the footnote below
| Variable | Age | Sex | GT | Age*Sex | GT*Sex | GT*Age | GT*Age*Sex |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP |
| 0.147 | 0.154 |
|
|
|
|
|
| DP |
| 0.215 |
|
|
| 0.255 |
| 0.652 |
| PP | 0.364 | 0.102 |
| 0.000 | 0.188 |
| 0.340 | 0.627 |
| BW |
|
|
|
| 0.767 |
| 0.484 |
|
| LVM |
| 0.378 |
|
| 0.436 | 0.170 | 0.908 |
|
| LVM/BW |
| 0.130 |
| 0.313 | 0.619 | 0.181 | 0.985 | 0.397 |
| LVIDdias |
| 0.938 | 0.547 |
| 0.742 | 0.599 | 0.692 |
|
| LVIDsys |
| 0.472 | 0.710 | 0.293 | 0.453 | 0.668 | 0.830 |
|
| FS |
| 0.155 | 0.430 | 0.414 | 0.205 | 0.469 | 0.512 | 0.480 |
| LVVd |
|
| 0.392 |
| 0.688 | 0.384 | 0.352 |
|
| LVVs |
|
| 0.219 | 0.139 | 0.951 | 0.389 | 0.984 |
|
| SV |
| 0.473 | 0.763 | 0.138 | 0.627 | 0.847 | 0.220 |
|
| EF |
| 0.662 | 0.566 | 0.330 | 0.809 | 0.284 | 0.555 | 0.301 |
| ASIDdias |
| 0.669 |
| 0.532 | 0.269 | 0.257 | 0.429 |
|
| ASIDsys |
| 0.268 |
| 0.596 | 0.691 |
| 0.960 |
|
| ASID%inc |
| 0.254 |
| 0.349 | 0.352 |
|
| 0.590 |
| CAIDdias |
| 0.237 |
|
| 0.309 | 0.137 | 0.403 |
|
| CAIDsys |
| 0.467 |
| 0.370 | 0.055 |
| 0.760 |
|
| CAID%inc |
| 0.133 |
| 0.214 | 0.264 | 0.084 | 0.825 | 0.502 |
| AVDs |
| 0.448 | 0.348 | 0.811 |
| 0.303 | 0.066 |
|
| HR |
| 0.945 | 0.175 | 0.809 | 0.203 | 0.054 | 0.919 | 0.444 |
| CO |
| 0.248 | 0.938 | 0.187 | 0.165 | 0.896 | 0.380 | 0.596 |
| CO/BW | 0.642 | 0.592 | 0.651 | 0.186 |
| 0.533 | 0.712 | 0.130 |
| E |
| 0.487 | 0.654 | 0.348 | 0.731 | 0.306 | 0.460 | 0.209 |
| A | 0.196 | 0.445 |
| 0.445 | 0.544 |
| 0.141 | 0.270 |
| E/A |
| 0.997 |
| 0.729 | 0.776 | 0.157 | 0.657 | 0.325 |
| DT | 0.087 | 0.131 | 0.180 | 0.474 |
| 0.066 | 0.034 | 0.275 |
| IVRT | 0.612 | 0.853 | 0.090 | 0.548 | 0.939 | 0.497 | 0.819 | 0.096 |
| E’ |
| 0.053 |
| 0.817 | 0.201 | 0.974 | 0.572 | 0.347 |
| S’ | 0.062 | 0.117 | 0.524 |
| 0.174 | 0.312 | 0.697 | 0.233 |
| A’ |
| 0.213 |
| 0.237 | 0.200 |
| 0.902 | 0.332 |
| E’/A’ |
| 0.203 |
| 0.338 |
|
| 0.648 | 0.627 |
| E/E’ | 0.398 | 0.142 |
| 0.252 | 0.711 | 0.052 | 0.170 | 0.317 |
| Collagen |
| N/A | 0.326 | N/A | N/A |
| N/A | 0.483 |
| Elastin | 0.585 | N/A | 0.585 | N/A | N/A | 0.899 | N/A | 0.127 |
GLM, general linear model; SP, systolic pressure; DP, diastolic pressure; PP, pulse pressure; BW, body weight; LVM, left ventricular (LV) mass; LVM/BW, LV mass normalized to body weight; LVIDdias, LV inner diameter at diastole; LVIDsys, LV inner diameter at systole; FS, fractional shortening; LVVd, LV volume at diastole; LVVs, LV volume at systole; SV, stroke volume; EF, ejection fraction; ASIDdias, ascending aortic inner diameter at diastole; ASIDsys, ascending aortic inner diameter at systole; ASID%inc, percent increase of the ascending aorta from diastole to systole; CAIDdias, carotid artery inner diameter at diastole; CAIDsys, carotid artery inner diameter at systole; CAID%inc, percent increase of the carotid artery from diastole to systole; AVDs, aortic valve diameter at systole; HR, heart rate; CO, cardiac output; CO/BW, cardiac output normalized to body weight; E, peak velocity of the early filling wave through the mitral valve; A, peak velocity of the atrial filling wave through the mitral valve; E/A, ratio of the early to atrial filling wave velocities; DT, deceleration time of the early filling velocity; IVRT, isovolumic relaxation time; E’, peak velocity of the LV lateral wall during early filling; S’, peak velocity of the LV lateral wall during systole; A’, peak velocity of the LV lateral wall during atrial filling; E’/A’, ratio of the LV wall velocities during early and atrial filling; E/E’, ratio of the wave velocity to the LV wall velocity during early filling; Collagen, normalized LV collagen content; Elastin, normalized LV elastin content.
Figure 1There are no differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (A) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (B) between genotypes. Pulse pressure (PP) (C) is elevated in Fbln5−/− mice at P21 and P60. Pressures were measured by left ventricular (LV) puncture at P7 (Le et al. 2012), which cannot measure arterial PP, and insertion of a solid‐state catheter in the ascending aorta at P21 and P60. *P < 0.05 between genotypes. n = 11–21 per group.
Figure 2Body weight (BW) (A) increases with age, is affected by sex, and is higher in Fbln5−/− mice at P60. Left ventricle mass (LVM) (B) is increased in Fbln5−/− mice at P21 and P60. Normalized LVM mass (LVM/BW) (C), an indication of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, is increased in Fbln5−/− mice at P7 and P21. *P < 0.05 between genotypes. n = 5–15 per group (A). n = 14–23 per group (B, C).
Figure 3Left ventricular inner diameters (LVID) (A) at diastole and systole increase with age, but are not affected by genotype (A). Fractional shortening (FS) (B), a measure of systolic function, is not affected by genotype. n = 11–20 per group.
Figure 4Left ventricular (LV) volumes at end‐diastole (LVVd) (A) and end systole (B) increase with age, are affected by sex, and in general are not different between genotypes. Stroke volume (SV) (C) increases with age and is not affected by sex or genotype. Ejection fraction (EF) (D), a measure of systolic function, decreases slightly with age and is not affected by sex or genotype. *P < 0.05 between genotypes. n = 3–12 per group (A, B). n = 9–17 per group (C, D).
Figure 5The end‐systolic diameter of the aortic valve orifice (AVDs) (A) increases with age and is not affected by genotype. Heart rate (HR) (B) decreases with age and is not affected by genotype. Cardiac output (CO) (C) increases with age and is not affected by genotype. Normalized cardiac output (CO/BW) (D) is not affected by age or genotype. *P < 0.05 between genotypes. n = 12–22 per group.
Figure 6Ascending aorta inner diameter (ASID) (A) increases with age and is affected by genotype. The percent increase of the ASID (B) is reduced in Fbln5−/− mice at all ages. The distensibility of the ascending aorta (C) is reduced in Fbln5−/− mice at P21 and P60. Distensibility cannot be calculated at P7, because we cannot measure arterial pulse pressures at this age. Carotid artery inner diameter (CAID) (D) increases with age and is affected by genotype. The percent increase of the CAID (E) is reduced in Fbln5−/− mice at P21 and P60. The distensibility of the carotid artery (F) is reduced in Fbln5−/− mice at P21 and P60. *P < 0.05 between genotypes. n = 10–22 per group.
Figure 7Representative Doppler images (A) with mitral valve (MV) early (E) and atrial (A) peak velocity values, and measurements of isovolumic relaxation times (IVRT) and deceleration times (DT) in P60 wild‐type (WT) and Fbln5−/− mice. MV E (B) is affected by age, but not genotype. MV A (C) is affected by genotype, but not age. The E/A ratio (D), a measure of diastolic function, is affected by age and genotype. DT (E) and IVRT (F) are increased in Fbln5−/−mice at P21. *P < 0.05 between genotypes. n = 10–22 per group.
Figure 8Representative tissue Doppler images (A) with left ventricular (LV) posterior wall (PW) velocities during systole (S’) and during early (E’) and atrial (A’) filling in P21 wild‐type (WT) and Fbln5−/− mice. LVPW E’ (B) velocity is decreased in Fbln5−/− mice at P7 and 21. LVPW A’ (C) velocity is increased in Fbln5−/− mice at P21 and P60. LVPW S’ (D) velocity is similar between genotypes at all ages. The E’/A’ (E) and E/E’ (F) ratios, which are indices of diastolic function, are different in Fbln5−/− mice compared to WT at most ages. *P < 0.05 between genotypes. n = 10–16 per group.
Figure 9There are weak correlations between measures of carotid artery (A) or ascending aorta compliance (B and C) (as measured by percent increase of the inner diameter) and diastolic function (as measured by ratios of pulsed wave, E/A, and tissue Doppler, E’/A’, filling velocities) in maturing mice.
Figure 10Representative histology sections of P60 carotid arteries. H&E staining and picrosirius red staining (PSR) observed under polarized light show no obvious differences between genotypes. Verhoeff Van Gieson (VVG) staining shows less intense staining of the elastic lamellae in Fbln5−/− arteries, especially in the outer layers. Scale bars = 30 μm. Histology sections from six different mice were examined for each group.
Figure 11Representative histology sections of P60 mouse hearts. H&E staining of the entire heart and of the left ventricular (LV) free wall show no differences between genotypes. Picrosirius red (PSR) staining of the LV free wall shows no differences in collagen density between genotypes. Verhoeff Van Gieson (VVG) staining of the thin pericardial layer (arrow) shows intact elastic fibers in both genotypes. VVG staining of coronary vessels shows an intact internal elastic lamina in both genotypes and no elastin staining between cardiomyocyte layers. H&E inset scale bars = 500 μm, H&E and PSR scale bars = 100 μm, VVG scale bars = 20 μm. Histology sections from six different mice were examined for each group.
Figure 12Normalized collagen (A) and elastin (B) content in the left ventricle. Collagen content is affected by age, but elastin content is not. There are increased collagen amounts in P21 Fbln5−/− aorta, with no differences at other ages. There are no differences in the elastin amounts between groups. n = 6 per group.