Literature DB >> 24760162

Femoral shaft bowing in the coronal plane has more significant effect on the coronal alignment of TKA than proximal or distal variations of femoral shape.

Jong-Min Kim1, Soo-Heon Hong, Jong-Min Kim1, Bum-Sik Lee, Dong-Eun Kim, Kyung-Ah Kim, Seong-Il Bin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine (1) variations in the shape of the proximal, middle, and distal femur in a series of Korean patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA), (2) the preoperative relationship between these three parameters and the distal valgus cutting angle referenced off the femoral intramedullary guide, and (3) whether there was any relationship between femoral bowing and variations in the shape of the proximal or distal femur in the coronal plane.
METHODS: The preoperative long-standing anteroposterior radiographs of 316 consecutive osteoarthritis patients who underwent primary TKA from 2009 to 2011 were examined. The femoral neck shaft angle, the femoral shaft bowing angle, and the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle were measured to assess the shape of the proximal, middle, and distal femur, respectively. The valgus cutting angle of the femur was defined as the angle between the distal anatomical and mechanical axes of the femur.
RESULTS: The study population showed large variations in femoral shape. The mean femoral intramedullary guide angle was 6.5° ± 1.3° (range: 4°-13°). The femoral shaft bowing angle was the factor that showed the strongest correlation with this angle (P < 0.001). The mechanical lateral distal femoral angle showed only a weak correlation (P = 0.001), and the femoral neck shaft angle showed no correlation (n.s.). The femoral shaft bowing angle showed a weak correlation with the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (P = 0.001), but was not significantly correlated with the femoral neck shaft angle (n.s.). Apparent femoral bowing (>3° of lateral or medial bowing) was found in 42 (13.3 %) of cases (37 cases of lateral bowing and five of medial bowing). Cases with lateral apparent femoral bowing >3° had a distal cutting angle of 8.6° ± 2.2° relative to the femoral intramedullary guide.
CONCLUSION: The femoral intramedullary guide angle was mainly influenced by femoral shaft bowing among femoral deformities in the coronal plane. Therefore, to increase the accuracy of distal femoral cut during TKA, it is necessary to confirm femoral deformities and to measure the femoral intramedullary guide angle preoperatively from coronal radiographs covering the whole femur. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24760162     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3006-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

2.  Comparison of the tibiofemoral rotational alignment after mobile and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dongwook Kim; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee; Sahnghoon Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The effects of femoral external derotational osteotomy on frontal plane alignment.

Authors:  M Nelitz; T Wehner; M Steiner; L Dürselen; S Lippacher
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparative experience with intramedullary and extramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G A Engh; T L Petersen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J R Moreland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary femoral alignment systems in total knee replacement.

Authors:  H E Cates; M A Ritter; E M Keating; P M Faris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations.

Authors:  J H Bargren; J D Blaha; M A Freeman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur. Pitfalls in the use of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C C Jiang; J N Insall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Won Chul Choi; Sahnghoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Jong Hun Jung; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Must bilaterality be considered in statistical analyses of total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Young Gon Na; Yeon Gwi Kang; Moon Jong Chang; Chong Bum Chang; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  26 in total

1.  Slight under-correction using individualized intentional varus femoral cutting leads to favorable outcomes in patients with lateral femoral bowing and varus knee.

Authors:  Han-Jun Lee; Jung-Won Lim; Dong-Hoon Lee; Dong-Hyun Kim; Yong-Beom Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  What is the optimal valgus pre-set for intramedullary femoral alignment rods in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  G Maderbacher; A Keshmiri; J Schaumburger; F Zeman; A M Birkenbach; B Craiovan; J Grifka; C Baier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Does final component alignment correlate with alignment of the bone resection surfaces in cemented total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Seung-Suk Seo; Chang-Wan Kim; Chang-Rack Lee; Jin-Hyuk Seo; Do-Hun Kim; Ok-Gul Kim; Young-Kyoung Min
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Sex differences in femoral deformity determined using three-dimensional assessment for osteoarthritic knees.

Authors:  Tomoharu Mochizuki; Osamu Tanifuji; Yoshio Koga; Takashi Sato; Koichi Kobayashi; Katsutoshi Nishino; Satoshi Watanabe; Akihiro Ariumi; Toshihide Fujii; Hiroshi Yamagiwa; Go Omori; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Femoral Component Varus Malposition is Associated with Tibial Aseptic Loosening After TKA.

Authors:  Bum-Sik Lee; Hyun-Ik Cho; Seong-Il Bin; Jong-Min Kim; Byeong-Kyu Jo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures in hypophosphatasia-not atypical at all.

Authors:  F Genest; L Seefried
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Risk factors of post-operative malalignment in fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Ahn; Ho Won Kang; Tae Yeong Yang; Jang Yun Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Proximal femur shape differs between subjects with lateral and medial knee osteoarthritis and controls: the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  B L Wise; L Kritikos; J A Lynch; F Liu; N Parimi; K L Tileston; M C Nevitt; N E Lane
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Fixed distal femoral valgus cutting angle is still justifiable in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Vipul Vijay; Edwin O Edomwonyi; Amit K Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-03-06

10.  Coronal Alignment of the Lower Extremity: A Gender-Based Radio-Graphic Analysis in Indian Patients.

Authors:  Mayur Nayak; Vijay Kumar; Rahul Yadav; Siddhartha Maredupaka; Deep Narayan Srivastava; Rajesh Malhotra; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.