Lecia A M Brown1, Jingji Jin2, Darren Ferrell1, Edin Sadic2, Demian Obregon3, Adam J Smith3, Jun Tan4, Brian Giunta5. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Neuroimmunology Laboratory, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States of America; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States of America. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Neuroimmunology Laboratory, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States of America. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Rashid Developmental Neurobiology Laboratory, Silver Child Development Center, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States of America. 4. Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Rashid Developmental Neurobiology Laboratory, Silver Child Development Center, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States of America; Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair, Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States of America; James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital, Tampa, Florida, United States of America. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Neuroimmunology Laboratory, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States of America; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States of America; Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair, Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, United States of America; James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
Abstract
Efavirenz (EFV) is among the most commonly used antiretroviral drugs globally, causes neurological symptoms that interfere with adherence and reduce tolerability, and may have central nervous system (CNS) effects that contribute in part to HIV associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) in patients on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Thus we evaluated a commonly used EFV containing regimen: EFV/zidovudine (AZT)/lamivudine (3TC) in murine N2a cells transfected with the human "Swedish" mutant form of amyloid precursor protein (SweAPP N2a cells) to assess for promotion of amyloid-beta (Aβ) production. Treatment with EFV or the EFV containing regimen generated significantly increased soluble amyloid beta (Aβ), and promoted increased β-secretase-1 (BACE-1) expression while 3TC, AZT, or, vehicle control did not significantly alter these endpoints. Further, EFV or the EFV containing regimen promoted significantly more mitochondrial stress in SweAPP N2a cells as compared to 3TC, AZT, or vehicle control. We next tested the EFV containing regimen in Aβ - producing Tg2576 mice combined or singly using clinically relevant doses. EFV or the EFV containing regimen promoted significantly more BACE-1 expression and soluble Aβ generation while 3TC, AZT, or vehicle control did not. Finally, microglial Aβ phagocytosis was significantly reduced by EFV or the EFV containing regimen but not by AZT, 3TC, or vehicle control alone. These data suggest the majority of Aβ promoting effects of this cART regimen are dependent upon EFV as it promotes both increased production, and decreased clearance of Aβ peptide.
Efavirenz (EFV) is among the most commonly used antiretroviral drugs globally, causes neurological symptoms that interfere with adherence and reduce tolerability, and may have central nervous system (CNS) effects that contribute in part to HIV associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) in patients on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Thus we evaluated a commonly used EFV containing regimen: EFV/zidovudine (AZT)/lamivudine (3TC) in murineN2a cells transfected with the human "Swedish" mutant form of amyloid precursor protein (SweAPP N2a cells) to assess for promotion of amyloid-beta (Aβ) production. Treatment with EFV or the EFV containing regimen generated significantly increased soluble amyloid beta (Aβ), and promoted increased β-secretase-1 (BACE-1) expression while 3TC, AZT, or, vehicle control did not significantly alter these endpoints. Further, EFV or the EFV containing regimen promoted significantly more mitochondrial stress in SweAPP N2a cells as compared to 3TC, AZT, or vehicle control. We next tested the EFV containing regimen in Aβ - producing Tg2576mice combined or singly using clinically relevant doses. EFV or the EFV containing regimen promoted significantly more BACE-1 expression and soluble Aβ generation while 3TC, AZT, or vehicle control did not. Finally, microglial Aβ phagocytosis was significantly reduced by EFV or the EFV containing regimen but not by AZT, 3TC, or vehicle control alone. These data suggest the majority of Aβ promoting effects of this cART regimen are dependent upon EFV as it promotes both increased production, and decreased clearance of Aβ peptide.
There has been considerable growth in patient's receiving combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in recent years [1]. Up to 50% of long-term HIV-infectedpatients experience HIV associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) [2]. Most recently it was shown the Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NNRTI) efavirenz (EFV) is associated with cognitive disorders even in asymptomatic HIV-infectedpatients [3]. A randomized controlled study [4] found subjects receiving EFV-containing regimens showed less improvement from baseline on instruments examining speed of information processing and executive function than patients not on EFV. Further, patients with preserved immune function on EFV regimens showed greater improvement on Trail-Making Tests A and B and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale digital symbol test after EFV interruption than the non-EFV control group [5]. EFV has substantial rates of central nervous system (CNS) side effects aside of cognitive impairment including sleep and dreaming disturbances and anxiety [6]–[8] that interfere with adherence and tolerability as well [9].Amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide generation and aggregation as plaques are traditionally known as key events in the development of Alzheimer's Disease (AD; [10]–[13]). The peptides have been evidenced to be neurotoxic, as they are reported mediators of inflammation [14], [15], and oxidative stress [16]. Aβ peptides are produced via the amyloidogenic pathway of amyloid precursor protein (APP) proteolysis, which involves the actions of β and γ-secretases [13], [17]. Initially, β-secretase (BACE-1) cleaves APP, creating an Aβ-containing carboxyl-terminal fragment known as β-C-terminal fragment (β-CTF) [18]. This proteolysis also generates an amino-terminal, soluble APP-β (sAPP-β) fragment, which is released extracellularly. Intracellularly, β-CTF is then cleaved by a multi-protein γ-secretase complex that results in generation of the Aβ peptide and a smaller γ-CTF [19], [20]. In the human brain Aβ1-40 is the predominant form whereas Aβ1-42 represents about 10% of Aβ in brain and has a greater propensity to form neurotoxic oligomeric and aggregated species [21].The rapid, early clinical phase-in of cART required dose de-escalations secondary to toxicities suggested to be related to mitochondrial drug side effects [22]. Mitochondrial dysfunction can result in an elevation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that in turn promotes amyloidogenic APP processing by promoting BACE-1 activity [18]. Such mitochondrial stress has also been reported occurs in patients taking lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine (AZT) and especially EFV [23]–[28]; a commonly used cART regimen [29]–[31]. In light of the increasing life-span's imparted by cART, the mitochondrial promoted by cART [23]–[27], [32]–[34], and the age associated risk for developing amyloid pathology [35], it is not surprising that a body of epidemiological data suggests significant numbers of long-term HIV survivors are at elevated risk of developing early brain aging in the form of AD like pathology including Aβ deposition [36]–[42].As a result, we hypothesized that Aβ pathology may be produced via the amyloidogenic pathway of APP proteolysis, which involves the actions of BACE-1 [13] in patients on such regimen and sought to test this with in vitro and in vivo models. Our results indicate that EFV is the primary antiretroviral in this commonly used EFV containing regimen: EFV/3TC/AZT [29]–[31] which is responsible for its promotion of Aβ pathology.
Materials and Methods
All animal work was approved by the University of South Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
Reagents
Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 peptides and control peptide (Aβ40-1) were obtained from QCB (Hopkinton, MA) and freshly solubilized in distilled H2O immediately before use. To determine the oligomeric state of Aβ in our assays, Aβ was immunoprecipitated from cell supernatants after incubation with microglia and/or neurons, and Western blot analysis was performed at time points of 12, 24, and 48 hr. Data revealed that both Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42, irrespective of the time points assayed, existed as a ladder of SDS-stable oligomers, with a predominant species of ∼32 kDa. Immun-Blot polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes were purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). Tris-buffered saline was obtained from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) and luminol reagent was obtained from Pierce Biotechnology. Anti-actin antibody was obtained from Roche. Antiretrovirals were obtained from The National Institutes of Health (NIH) AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program (Rockville, MD). Regarding dosages administered, cART effects in vivo are likely to occur over long- term exposures [43]. Thus, chronic, low dose, in vivo effects of any reagent are often very appropriately modeled in vitro, by proportionally higher doses of the same reagent, over more acute time frames [43]. For these reasons we used 10 µM cART doses throughout our in vitro works and per our previous study [44]. The doses of cART administered in vivo were based on based on human clinical therapy [45], the body weight of the mice, the short dosing period of 10 ten days, the administration method being in chow as opposed to intravenous administration, as well as those reported in previous publications: AZT 50 mg/kg [46]-[48], 3TC 40 mg/kg [47], [48], and EFV 15 mg/kg [46], [49].
Neuronal Aβ Production Assay
This was performed according to our previous works [44]. Briefly, SweAPP N2a cells were treated with EFV, AZT, and 3TC both alone (10 µM) and in combination (10 µM) for 18 hours. Aβ1-40, 42 peptides were detected directly from the conditioned media and quantified in these samples using Aβ1-40, 42 ELISA kits (Life Technologies) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
Western immunoblotting
Western blot was performed as described previously [50], [51]. Briefly, total protein content was estimated using the Bio-Rad protein assay in strict accordance with manufacturer's directions. Immunoblotting was performed with a primary antibody followed by an anti-mouse HRP-conjugated IgG secondary antibody as a tracer. Primary antibodies used included: 6E10 monoclonal anti-Aβ antibody (Covance, 1∶1000), polyclonal Rabbit anti- BACE-1 (Sigma1∶1000), C-terminus monoclonal anti-BACE-1 (Millipore 1∶1000), and anti-actin antibody (Sigma, 1∶1500).For the in vivo studies of Aβ associated pathology we employed our previous methods [50], [51]. Left hemispheres of 3 month old transgenic and nontransgenic mouse brains were lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer and aliquots were electrophoretically separated using 16.5% Tris–tricine gels. Electrophoresed proteins were then transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad), washed in dH2O, then blocked in Tris-buffered saline containing 5% (w/v) non-fat dry milk. Membranes were then hybridized with various primary antibodies followed by washing in dH2O and then incubation for 1 h at ambient temperature with the appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1∶1000). For both in vitro and in vivo studies, blots were developed and then assessed densitometrically analyzed using the Fluor-S MultiImager with Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
Mitochondrial Stress Analysis: Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and reactive oxygen species (ROS)
ATP determination was performed using the Invitrogen ATP determination kit (A22066). MMP analysis was performed using a JC-1 (excitation filter 530/25, emission filter 590/35) MMP detection kit (Biotium). Cellular ROS generation was analyzed using 2,7-dichloro dihydrofluorescein diacetate (excitation filter 485/20, emission filter528/20) from the Invitrogen ROS detection kit. For all three analyses of mitochondrial stress, the reagents and reaction mixture were combined according to the supplied protocol. All fluorescence measurements were read using a Biotek Synergy H1 microplate reader.
Microglial Phagocytosis Assay
This was performed according to our previous studies [44], [50]. Briefly, primary mouse microglia were treated with “aged” Aβ1-42 peptide conjugated with FITC (BioSource Life Technologies™) with antiretroviral drugs both alone (10 µM) and in combination (10 µM). The total cellular protein of all groups was quantified and adjusted using the Bio-Rad protein assay. Extracellular and cell associated FITC-tagged Aβ was quantified using an SPECTRAmax GEMINI microplate fluorometer (Molecular Devices Corp.) with an emission wavelength of 538 nm and an excitation wavelength of 485 nm. Microglial cells were rinsed 3 times in Aβ-free complete medium, and the media was exchanged with fresh Aβ-free complete medium for 10 min both to allow for removal of non-incorporated Aβ and to promote concentration of the Aβ into phagosomes. The relative mean fluorescence values for each sample at 37°C and 4°C at the indicated time points were determined by fluorometric analysis. Relative mean values were calculated as: (mean fluorescence value for each sample at 37°C - mean fluorescence value for each sample at 4°C). In this manner, both extracellular and cell associated FITC-labeled Aβ were quantified.
Statistical analysis
All data were normally distributed; therefore, in instances of single mean comparisons, Levene's test for equality of variances followed by t-test for independent samples was used to assess significance. In instances of multiple mean comparisons, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, followed by post-hoc comparison using Bonferonni's method/correction. Alpha levels were set at 0.05 for all analyses. The statistical package for the social sciences release 10.0.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all data analysis.
Results
Epidemiological reports indicate that HAND persists in patients even with good viremic control who take EFV [3]. Previous studies have shown that cART imparts mitochondrial toxicity in the form of elevate ROS [23], [24]. A high ROS microenvironment has been shown to promote the activity of BACE-1, a key enzyme the generation of Aβ in the brain [52]. Brain oligomeric [53] and Aβ1-40,42
[54] have been correlated with cognitive impairment. Since the EFV containing regimen may promote mitochondrial dysfunction [23], [24], [27], [34], [55] which could result in increased BACE-1 activity, we investigated the effect of a commonly used EFV containing cART regimen [29]–[31] for its ability to upregulate Aβ production via activation of BACE-1 and amyloidogenic APP processing and also for its ability to reduce microglial phagocytosis of Aβ1-40,42.
BACE-1 is involved in Aβ generation promoted by the EFV containing cART regimen in cultured SweAPP N2a cells (Fig. 1)
Using similar conditions as in our prior investigations [44], SweAPP N2a cells were treated with the EFV containing regimen: 3TC, AZT, EFV or each drug singly at 10 µM in addition to PBS control for 18 hours. Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptides were then measured in conditioned media from these cells by ELISA (Fig. 1A–C) while BACE-1 expression was measured in cell lysates by Western Blot analysis (Fig. 1D–E). The EFV containing regimen increased Aβ40 and Aβ42 production in SweAPP N2a cells significantly (**P<0.05). Importantly, we found that EFV alone was more potent than the EFV containing regimen in terms of significantly increasing Aβ40 and Aβ42 production by these cells (***P<0.001). Additionally EFV or the EFV containing regimen increased BACE-1 expression in SweAPP N2a cells significantly (***P<0.001). These data would suggest that 3TC and/or AZT somehow reduces the toxicity of EFV in terms of promoting amyloidogenic APP processing and that EFV is the primary agent promoting Aβ production in SweAPP N2a cells. There is some evidence to indicate that AZT may indeed have a neuroprotective effect [56]–[58] which could explain why the EFV containing regimen is less potent in its amyloid producing effects compared to EFV alone.
Figure 1
EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treatment promotes Aβ generation in cultured neuronal cells via BACE-1 activation in vitro.
Aβ species were analyzed in cell lysates from SweAPP N2a cells (A) by ELISA. Data are represented as the mean ± of a percentage of Aβ peptides secreted 24 h after 3TC, AZT, EFV, or 3TC/EFV/AZT administration, relative fold over control (PBS treated). Significant increases in Aβ were observed in EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated cells were observed compared to control (***P<0.001 and **P<0.05 respectively by ANOVA). (B) Western blot (6E10 antibody) of conditioned media shows increased oligomeric Aβ species vs. s-APP-α (control) in the EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated cells (***P<0.001 and **P<0.05 respectively). (D) BACE-1 expression in cultured media revealed significant differences between EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated cells compared to untreated control (***P<0.001). β-actin is used for the internal loading control. Results are representative of three independent experiments.
EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treatment promotes Aβ generation in cultured neuronal cells via BACE-1 activation in vitro.
Aβ species were analyzed in cell lysates from SweAPP N2a cells (A) by ELISA. Data are represented as the mean ± of a percentage of Aβ peptides secreted 24 h after 3TC, AZT, EFV, or 3TC/EFV/AZT administration, relative fold over control (PBS treated). Significant increases in Aβ were observed in EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated cells were observed compared to control (***P<0.001 and **P<0.05 respectively by ANOVA). (B) Western blot (6E10 antibody) of conditioned media shows increased oligomeric Aβ species vs. s-APP-α (control) in the EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated cells (***P<0.001 and **P<0.05 respectively). (D) BACE-1 expression in cultured media revealed significant differences between EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated cells compared to untreated control (***P<0.001). β-actin is used for the internal loading control. Results are representative of three independent experiments.
Cerebral amyloidosis in Tg2576 mice is increased by EFV or the EFV containing cART regimen (Fig 2)
Brain Aβ deposition is a pathognomonic feature of AD [59], and oligomeric Aβ species are thought to be a driving force in AD-type neurodegeneration [60]–[63]. They may also play a role in HAND development [37]–[42] The transgenicTg2576mouse [64] is a widely used model of cerebral amyloidosis, and we purchased them from Taconic (Germantown, NY) at 8 months of age. They were evaluated for changes in cerebral Aβ after 10 days treatment with each antiretroviral singly or combined as well as vehicle control. Data are represented as mean ± SD with n = 5 females per group at 8 months of age. Western blot analysis of brain homogenates revealed significantly increased Aβ species in both the EFV and EFV containing regimen groups (**p<0.01 and 0.05 respectively); again suggesting that EFV accelerates cerebral amyloidosis as opposed to having a cumulative effect with 3TC and AZT. Indeed AZT is most likely behind the reduced potency of the EFV containing regimen compared to EFV alone in terms of Aβ pathology in light of reports that it may be neuroprotective [56]–[58]. Additionally EFV or the EFV containing regimen increased BACE-1 expression in SweAPP N2a cells significantly (***P<0.001).
EFV/3TC/AZT increases soluble Aβ levels in Tg2576 mice via BACE-1 activation in vivo.
(A) Aβ40, 42 peptides were analyzed in brain homogenates from 8 month old Tg2576mice by ELISA (n = 5 mice for each group). One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc comparison revealed significant differences between control (Tg2576mice treated with PBS) and EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT -treated Tg2576mice (P<0.001 and 0.05 respectively with n = 5 mice/group). (B) Western Blot of brain homogenates using anti-Aβ1-17 antibody (6E10) shows total APP and a bands corresponding to soluble Aβ oligomer species. β-actin was an internal control. A t-test revealed significant differences in soluble Aβ species between EFV-treated compared to 3TC/AZT/EFV, 3TC or AZT treated Tg2576mice (P<0.01) (C) BACE-1 expression in brain homogenate of Tg2576mice significantly was increased in EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT -treated Tg2576mice (P<0.001).
EFV promotes mitochondrial stress in SweAPP N2a cells (Fig. 3)
To determine if EFV or the EFV containing cART regimen could promote mitochondrial stress in an amyloid producing model, SweAPP N2a cells were treated with EFV, 3TC, AZT, or all three antiretrovirals combined in addition to vehicle control (PBS) for 48 hours. We performed three separate assays to determine general mitochondrial function. These included analyses of cellular ATP production, MMP, and ROS production. EFV or the EFV containing regimen were most potent in reducing mitochondrial function. Mitochondria produce approximately 90% of the total cellular ATP in neurons [65]. We therefore first examined ATP levels in SweAPP N2a cells as a measure of mitochondrial function. Cells treated with EFV or the EFV-containing regimen had greatly decreased ATP levels (***P<0.001) although the EFV containing regimen had slightly less ATP depletion than EFV alone. Mitochondria from SweAPP N2a cells treated with EFV or the EFV containing regimen showed significantly reduced maximal respiratory rates compared to 3TC or AZT treated SweAPP N2a cells; mirroring the results with the ATP analysis. The MMP is an indicator of electron transport chain function [65].Mitochondria are the main source of cellular ROS in the brain, thus the rate of ROS reflects the efficiency of mitochondrial function as well [65] (Fig. 3C–F). EFV or the EFV containing regimen caused a large increase in ROS production (P<0.001 and P<0.05 respectively). AZT and 3TC did not cause a significant rise thus explaining the reduced potency in terms of promoting ROS production of the three drug combination versus EFV alone.
Figure 3
cART treatment of SweAPP N2a cells promotes mitochondrial dysfunction.
(A) ATP levels are reduced in EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated SweAPP N2a neuron cells: SweAPP N2a cells were grown with 10 µM of each medication or all three medications combined for 48 h. We found a significant decrease in ATP levels in cells treated with EFV or 3TC/AZT/EFV (***P<0.001). (B)MMP is reduced in EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT SweAPP N2a cells: In accord with reduced ATP levels we found a similar reduction in MMP in the EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated groups (***P<0.001) (C–F) ROS levels are increased in EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated SweAPP N2a cells: EFV-treated primary neuron cells have significantly higher ROS contents (**
P<0.001) after incubation for 60 min than untreated primary neuron. (C–E)The average relative fluorescence units of DCFDA in neurons from each treatment group as indicated by the mean ± standard deviations (D, F) The ROS content in the antiretroviral treatment is expressed as % RFU ± standard deviations for each group compared to untreated control primary neuron cells (100%). (*P<0.05, *** P<0.001).
cART treatment of SweAPP N2a cells promotes mitochondrial dysfunction.
(A) ATP levels are reduced in EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated SweAPP N2a neuron cells: SweAPP N2a cells were grown with 10 µM of each medication or all three medications combined for 48 h. We found a significant decrease in ATP levels in cells treated with EFV or 3TC/AZT/EFV (***P<0.001). (B)MMP is reduced in EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT SweAPP N2a cells: In accord with reduced ATP levels we found a similar reduction in MMP in the EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated groups (***P<0.001) (C–F) ROS levels are increased in EFV or EFV/3TC/AZT treated SweAPP N2a cells: EFV-treated primary neuron cells have significantly higher ROS contents (**
P<0.001) after incubation for 60 min than untreated primary neuron. (C–E)The average relative fluorescence units of DCFDA in neurons from each treatment group as indicated by the mean ± standard deviations (D, F) The ROS content in the antiretroviral treatment is expressed as % RFU ± standard deviations for each group compared to untreated control primary neuron cells (100%). (*P<0.05, *** P<0.001).From the three cell-based assays that were utilized to monitor different parameters of mitochondrial function, EFV was identified as the most deleterious compound in our screen of this commonly used cART regimen [29]–[31]. From all three assays we see that AZT and 3TC reduce this effect promoted by EFV.
Microglial phagocytosis of Aβ1-42 peptides is opposed by EFV (Fig. 4)
Amyloid load in the brain is affected not only by production, but also by its clearance from the brain via microglia mediated mechanisms [66]. To determine whether the EFV containing regimen could affect microglial clearance of Aβ and further promote amyloidosis, we performed a phagocytosis assay with primary mouse microglia in the presence of EFV, 3TC, AZT or all three antiretrovirals combined in addition to PBS control. Following detection of FITC-tagged Aβ1-42 in extracellular and cell associated fractions, we again found that EFV or the EFV containing regimen inhibited microglial phagocytosis/clearance. These two treatments significantly inhibited microglial phagocytosis of Aβ1-42 peptides as determined by high levels of peptide remaining in the cultured media (extracellular) (p<0.001 and p<0.05 respectively). In addition, EFV or the EFV containing regimen tested also significantly reduced levels of phagosomal (cell associated) Aβ1-42 (p<0.001 and p<0.05 respectively). Also, when comparing cell associated Aβ1-42 levels of the EFV compared to the three drug combination to levels of these compound alone, the differences suggest the major reduction in phagocytosis is imparted by EFV and the addition of the other two antiretrovirals of the regimen are not additive in nature. Importantly, when comparing the levels of extracellular Aβ1-42 to that of cell associated we can see that the phagocytosis/clearance profiles are relatively congruent for each treatment condition. That is to say, when a given treatment maintains high levels of extracellular Aβ1-42, the corresponding cell associated levels are relatively low. Not only does this apparent relationship between extracellular and cell associated Aβ1-42 levels confirm the accuracy of the assay, but also furthers the overall significance of the inhibition of microglial phagocytosis by the antiretrovirals [44].
Discussion
Here, we elucidate a potential mechanism whereby EFV may have neurotoxic effects via promotion of brain Aβ. As shown in Figure 5, our present study has led to the proposed mechanism of neurotoxicity in which EFV promotes an increase in Aβ in vitro and in vivo on both the production and clearance fronts via its inhibition of proper MMP resulting in reduced ATP stores and thus a high ROS environment in the CNS. It is proposed that EFV induced high ROS microenvironments (Fig. 3) in the CNS promote BACE-1 APP processing ([18]; Fig. 1) and also inhibits microglial phagocytic functions (Fig. 4; [67]). These events in turn all promote production of Aβ species.
Figure 5
Proposed mechanism of EFV neurotoxicity.
Our present work suggests that EFV promotes an increase in Aβ in vitro and in vivo on both the production and clearance fronts via its inhibition of neurnoal MMP resulting in reduced ATP stores and thus a high ROS environment in the CNS. Previous studies indicate such high ROS microenvironments in the CNS promote BACE-1 APP processing and also inhibit microglial Aβ clearance functions. These events in turn all promote production of Aβ species. (*Note: Red arrows = inhibition, Green arrows = promotion).
Figure 4
EFV/3TC/AZT inhibits microglial phagocytosis of Aβ1-42 peptide.
(A) Primary microglia (1×105 cells/well in 24-well tissue culture plates) were treated with aged FITC tagged Aβ1-42 (50 nM) in complete medium for 60 min with antiretroviral medications (10uM) combined or singly as indicated, or PBS (control). As a control for nonspecifically incorporated Aβ, microglial cells were incubated at 4°C with the same treatment followed by DAPI staining. EFV or 3TC/AZT/EFV inhibited microglia-colocalization by fluorescence microscopy. Green indicates Aβ1-42 positive; blue indicates microglia nuclei. Addition of heat inactivated HIV-1 Tat yielded similar results as vehicle control (data not shown) (B) Cell supernatants and lysates were analyzed for extracellular (top) and cell associated (bottom) FITC-Aβ using a fluorimeter. Data are represented as the relative fold of mean fluorescence change (mean ± SD), calculated as the mean fluorescence for each sample at 37°C divided by mean fluorescence at 4°C (n = 6 for each condition presented). One-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc comparison showed a significant difference between EFV (***P<0.001) or EFV/3TC/AZT (**P<0.05) but not 3TC or AZT compared to control.
EFV/3TC/AZT inhibits microglial phagocytosis of Aβ1-42 peptide.
(A) Primary microglia (1×105 cells/well in 24-well tissue culture plates) were treated with aged FITC tagged Aβ1-42 (50 nM) in complete medium for 60 min with antiretroviral medications (10uM) combined or singly as indicated, or PBS (control). As a control for nonspecifically incorporated Aβ, microglial cells were incubated at 4°C with the same treatment followed by DAPI staining. EFV or 3TC/AZT/EFV inhibited microglia-colocalization by fluorescence microscopy. Green indicates Aβ1-42 positive; blue indicates microglia nuclei. Addition of heat inactivated HIV-1 Tat yielded similar results as vehicle control (data not shown) (B) Cell supernatants and lysates were analyzed for extracellular (top) and cell associated (bottom) FITC-Aβ using a fluorimeter. Data are represented as the relative fold of mean fluorescence change (mean ± SD), calculated as the mean fluorescence for each sample at 37°C divided by mean fluorescence at 4°C (n = 6 for each condition presented). One-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc comparison showed a significant difference between EFV (***P<0.001) or EFV/3TC/AZT (**P<0.05) but not 3TC or AZT compared to control.
Proposed mechanism of EFV neurotoxicity.
Our present work suggests that EFV promotes an increase in Aβ in vitro and in vivo on both the production and clearance fronts via its inhibition of neurnoal MMP resulting in reduced ATP stores and thus a high ROS environment in the CNS. Previous studies indicate such high ROS microenvironments in the CNS promote BACE-1 APP processing and also inhibit microglial Aβ clearance functions. These events in turn all promote production of Aβ species. (*Note: Red arrows = inhibition, Green arrows = promotion).EFV has been associated with serious adverse reactions, most of which can in part be attributed directly or indirectly to dysfunction of mitochondria [22]–[25], [33]. We found that EFV, or the EFV containing regimen consistently and significantly promoted mitochondrial oxidative stress in the form of reduced cellular ATP stores (Fig. 3A) and MMP (Fig. 3B), as well as increased release of ROS (Fig. 3C–F). These observations suggest the mitochondrial stress imparted by this cART regimen is largely dependent upon EFV and that 3TC and/or AZT may have some protective effect. Indeed there is some evidence that the latter antiretroviral may help to preserve cognitive function [56]–[58]Reactive microgliosis can be associated with the formation of microglial phenotypes that are unfavorable to phagocytic activities [68]. ROS are an important signal for cellular activation and proliferation. Over the long term lead to microglial dysfunction, rendering the phagocytes unable to perform their vital clearance functions [68]. This may underlie the reduced microglial phagocytosis of Aβ observed in microglia treated with EFV or the EFV containing regimen (Fig. 4).Several lines of epidemiological evidence signal a role for Aβ in HAND development while some studies have not yet fully implicated over production of the protein as a contributor to HAND. It is known that pathological similarities exist between HAND and AD [37]–[42]. The latter is more so characterized by extracellular deposits of Aβ1-42 in the form of plaques and aggregations of microtubule-associated tau yielding neurofibrillary tangles (NFT). In contrast, with HIV infection, the plaques are more diffuse [38] rather than neuritic [41].Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers can mirror pathogenic cerebral amyloid deposition. Decreased CSF Aβ1-42 and increased CSF tau can differentiate symptomatic ADparticipants and cognitively normal individuals at high risk for symptomatic AD from cognitively normal individuals at low risk for symptomatic AD [69], [70]. In that regard, at least some HAND patients have CSF Aβ1-42 values comparable to symptomatic AD individuals, that is, reduced [34], [41]. This is salient because reductions in CSF Aβ42 have been found in almost all individuals with increased fibrillar amyloid deposition within the brain as assessed with positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid binding of N-methyl-[11C]2-(4-methylaminophenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazole (11C-PiB) [71]–[73]. Likewise, AIDS dementia complex (ADC) patients had significantly decreased CSF Aβ1-42 and increased total and phospho (t-tau and p-tau respectively) concentrations similar to AD [38]. Achim and colleague's (2009) reported increased Aβ by both autopsy examination and PET imaging of HIVpatients. Specifically, cases with HIV encephalitis (HIV-E) were about twice as likely to have amyloid detected (72%) than HIV+ patients without HIV-E (38%; [37]). In the same year Clifford and colleagues reported Aβ1-42 measurements in CSF of cognitively impairedpatients with HIV were similarly reduced as in in patients with mild dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). Normal or slightly depressed CSF tau and p-tau measurements distinguished these patients with HAND from patients with DAT [42].Further analysis as to why low CSF Aβ1-42 in patients with HAND is needed. However, there are several reasons which may explain altered Aβ metabolism in HIV disease [42] in addition to the data presented in this report. First, HIV-1 transactivator of transcription (Tat) protein may compete with APP and/or apolipoprotein E (an Aβ chaperone) for binding to the low density lipoprotein receptor related protein (LRP), thus inhibiting LRP mediated clearance of Aβfrom brain interstitial fluid to periphery [74]. Second, APP cleavage products (sAPPαand sAPPβ) have been reported to be reduced in the CSF of patients with HAND compared to those with DAT or HIV-negative controls, with sAPPα (a neurotrophic protein) showing a slight decline in the asymptomatic HIV state [75].In 2010 Ances and colleagues reported cognitively unimpaired HIV+ participants, even with low CSF Aβ1-42 (<500 pg/mL), did not have (11)C-PiB parameters suggesting brain fibrillar amyloid deposition. This dissimilarity between cognitively unimpaired HIV+ and preclinical AD may reflect differences in Aβ1-42 production and/or formation of diffuse plaques [76]. This same group, in 2012, reported symptomatic ADpatients were significantly older, had significantly lower CSF Aβ1-42, and had significantly higher CSF tau levels than other groups. Regardless of degree of impairment, HIVpatients did not have increased 11C-PiB [77]. Possible reasons for the absence of 11C-PiB in HIVpatients are: 1) decreased Aβ1-42 production secondary to decreased synaptic activity, 2) increased intraneuronal Aβ1-42 deposition that is undetectable by 11C-PiB [37]; and/or 3) increased Aβ1-42 brain deposition but in a more diffuse, non-fibrillar form that is undetectable by 11C-PiB [36], [39]. Future longitudinal examinations within older HIV+ participants are required to determine if diffuse or oligomeric forms could with time subsequently become fibrillar (11C-PiB positive) deposits [38], [42]. Our findings reinforce the importance of understanding the effects of cART on amyloid metabolism since EFV could contribute to the neurological complications that are associated with HIV infection seen clinically [3]–[9].The current research has several strengths and weaknesses. Regarding the former, we observed consistent findings in both in vitro and in vivo model systems in that EFV or the EFV containing regimen caused increase amyloidogenic APP processing as a function of increased BACE-1 expression and decreased microglial clearance of Aβ. Additionally, we find the level of mitochondrial dysfunction imparted by each antiretroviral medication correlates consistently with the increased level of BACE-1 expression and Aβ production, and the decreased microglial phagocytosis of Aβ peptide. Second our results coincide with other reports indicating the mitochondrial toxicity of antiretrovirals [23]–[27], [32]–[34], and reports that increased ROS can result in increased BACE-1 activity [22].This report has limitations as well. First, it describes a mechanism for a subset of HAND cases since not all HIV infected individuals are taking EFV or an EFV containing regimen. It should be noted that in the present study, we did not investigate the plasma or CSF concentrations of antiretrovirals or their metabolites. However, all three drugs seem to have good CNS penetration [22], [78], [79], which could support the the neurologic symptoms [3], [5], [8] noted by others.In sum, our present work suggests that EFV promotes an increase in Aβ on both the production and clearance fronts through oxidative stress. We hypothesize that a disrupted MMP with resultant lowered neuronal ATP stores promotes a high level of ROS. In turn, this can both promote BACE-1 activity and impair microglial clearance mechanisms. If this mouse model translates to the clinical syndrome, then a pharmacotherapeutic strategy aimed at opposing the EFV-mediated reduced microglial Aβ clearance and/or EFV-mediated neuronal Aβ over production via BACE-1 should be beneficial to prevent or treat HAND.
Authors: Anne M Fagan; Denise Head; Aarti R Shah; Daniel Marcus; Mark Mintun; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: B De Strooper; M Beullens; B Contreras; L Levesque; K Craessaerts; B Cordell; D Moechars; M Bollen; P Fraser; P S George-Hyslop; F Van Leuven Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1997-02-07 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Nadezda Apostolova; Leysa J Gomez-Sucerquia; Anna Gortat; Ana Blas-Garcia; Juan V Esplugues Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Ana Blas-García; Nadezda Apostolova; Daniel Ballesteros; Daniel Monleón; Jose M Morales; Milagros Rocha; Victor M Victor; Juan V Esplugues Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Douglas A Green; Eliezer Masliah; Harry V Vinters; Pouneh Beizai; David J Moore; Cristian L Achim Journal: AIDS Date: 2005-03-04 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Ana B Sanchez; Giuseppe P Varano; Cyrus M de Rozieres; Ricky Maung; Irene C Catalan; Cari C Dowling; Natalia E Sejbuk; Melanie M Hoefer; Marcus Kaul Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jingji Jin; Bethany Grimmig; James Izzo; Lecia A M Brown; Charles Hudson; Adam J Smith; Jun Tan; Paula C Bickford; Brian Giunta Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Sérgio M de Almeida; Clea E Ribeiro; Indianara Rotta; Scott Letendre; Michael Potter; Bin Tang; Meiri Batistela; Florin Vaida; Ronald J Ellis Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2019-07-07 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Ankit Shah; Mohitkumar R Gangwani; Nitish S Chaudhari; Alexy Glazyrin; Hari K Bhat; Anil Kumar Journal: Neurotox Res Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 3.911
Authors: Qing Ma; Florin Vaida; Jenna Wong; Chelsea A Sanders; Yu-ting Kao; David Croteau; David B Clifford; Ann C Collier; Benjamin B Gelman; Christina M Marra; Justin C McArthur; Susan Morgello; David M Simpson; Robert K Heaton; Igor Grant; Scott L Letendre Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 2.643