Literature DB >> 23192787

Evaluation of factors affecting tibial bone strain after unicompartmental knee replacement.

Elise C Pegg1, Jonathan Walter, Stephen J Mellon, Hemant G Pandit, David W Murray, Darryl D D'Lima, Benjamin J Fregly, Harinderjit S Gill.   

Abstract

Persistent pain is an important cause of patient dissatisfaction after unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and has been correlated with localized tibial strain. However, the factors that influence these strains are not well understood. To address this issue, we created finite element models to examine the effect on tibial strain of: (1) muscle forces (estimated using instrumented knee data) acting on attachment sites on the proximal tibia, (2) UKR implantation, (3) loading position, and (4) changes in gait pattern. Muscle forces acting on the tibia had no significant influence on strains within the periprosthetic region, but UKR implantation increased strain by 20%. Strain also significantly increased if the region of load application was moved >3 mm medially. The strain within the periprosthetic region was found to be dependent on gait pattern and was influenced by both medial and lateral loads, with the medial load having a greater effect (regression coefficients: medial = 0.74, lateral = 0.30). These findings suggest that tibial strain is increased after UKR and may be a cause of pain. It may be possible to reduce pain through modification of surgical factors or through altered gait patterns.
Copyright © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23192787      PMCID: PMC3602347          DOI: 10.1002/jor.22283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  31 in total

1.  Hip-joint and abductor-muscle forces adequately represent in vivo loading of a cemented total hip reconstruction.

Authors:  J Stolk; N Verdonschot; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Scott L Delp; Scott A Banks; Marcus G Pandy; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Statistical methods in finite element analysis.

Authors:  Fazilat H Dar; Judith R Meakin; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo.

Authors:  David G Lloyd; Thor F Besier
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Physiological prediction of muscle forces--I. Theoretical formulation.

Authors:  K R Kaufman; K W An; W J Litchy; E Y Chao
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis.

Authors:  R Huiskes; H Weinans; H J Grootenboer; M Dalstra; B Fudala; T J Slooff
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  The load-bearing area in the knee joint.

Authors:  P S Walker; J V Hajek
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Early complications of unicompartmental knee replacement: the Droitwich experience.

Authors:  G Vardi; A E Strover
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  The role of muscles in joint adaptation and degeneration.

Authors:  W Herzog; D Longino; A Clark
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Strain distribution within the human femur due to physiological and simplified loading: finite element analysis using the muscle standardized femur model.

Authors:  K Polgár; H S Gill; M Viceconti; D W Murray; J J O'Connor
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.617

View more
  17 in total

1.  The increase in posterior tibial slope provides a positive biomechanical effect in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Sae Kwang Kwon; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Jun-Sang Lee; Yong-Gon Koh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A semi-automated measurement technique for the assessment of radiolucency.

Authors:  E C Pegg; B J L Kendrick; H G Pandit; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  [Fixed bearing unicondylar arthroplasty in medial osteoarthritis of the knee].

Authors:  R Becker; C Paech; A Denecke
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  [Comparison of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in the treatment of severe medial compartment osteoarthritis].

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Yi Zeng; Qinsheng Hu; Haibo Si; Yong Nie; Bin Shen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-09-15

5.  Impact of keel saw blade design and thickness on the incidence of tibial plateau fracture and tibial implant-loosening in cementless medial UKR.

Authors:  Lena Keppler; Steffen Klingbeil; Alexander Martin Keppler; Johannes Becker; Christian Fulghum; Björn Michel; Kilian Voigts; Wolfgang Reng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  CT Morphometric Analysis of Medial Tibial Condyles: Are the Currently Available Designs of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Suitable for Indian Knees?

Authors:  Radhakrishna Kantanavar; Mohan Madhav Desai; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 1.033

7.  Does Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Affect Tibial Bone Strain? A Paired Cadaveric Comparison of Fixed- and Mobile-bearing Designs.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Orcun Taylan; Joshua Slane; Ben Vanthienen; Jeroen Verhaegen; Lyne Anthonissen; G Harry van Lenthe; Thomas Heyse; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Computational study on the effect of malalignment of the tibial component on the biomechanics of total knee arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  D-S Suh; K-T Kang; J Son; O-R Kwon; C Baek; Y-G Koh
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Finite Element Analysis of Mobile-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: The Influence of Tibial Component Coronal Alignment.

Authors:  Guang-Duo Zhu; Wan-Shou Guo; Qi-Dong Zhang; Zhao-Hui Liu; Li-Ming Cheng
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Biomechanical Effects of Posterior Condylar Offset and Posterior Tibial Slope on Quadriceps Force and Joint Contact Forces in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Yong-Gon Koh; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Jun-Sang Lee; Sae Kwang Kwon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.