Literature DB >> 24759512

Impacts of recreational motorboats on fishes: a review.

A K Whitfield1, A Becker2.   

Abstract

A considerable amount of research has been conducted on the impacts of recreational boating activities on fishes but little or no synthesis of the information has been undertaken. This review shows that motor boats impact on the biology and ecology of fishes but the effects vary according to the species and even particular size classes. Direct hits on fishes by propellers are an obvious impact but this aspect has been poorly documented. Alterations in the wave climate and water turbidity may also influence fishes and their habitats, especially submerged and emergent plant beds. Sound generated by boat motors can also influence the communication and behaviour of certain species. Pollution arising from fuel spillages, exhaust emissions and antifouling paints all have detrimental effects on fishes. Finally, the use of recreational boats as vectors of aquatic invasive organisms is very real and has created major problems to the ecology of aquatic systems.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Boat traffic; Degradation; Disturbance; Invasives; Pollution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24759512     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  10 in total

Review 1.  Aquatic noise pollution: implications for individuals, populations, and ecosystems.

Authors:  Hansjoerg P Kunc; Kirsty Elizabeth McLaughlin; Rouven Schmidt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Condition-dependent responses of fish to motorboats.

Authors:  H R Harding; T A C Gordon; K Wong; M I McCormick; S D Simpson; A N Radford
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Chronic playback of boat noise does not impact hatching success or post-hatching larval growth and survival in a cichlid fish.

Authors:  Rick Bruintjes; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Impact of noise on development, physiological stress and behavioural patterns in larval zebrafish.

Authors:  Rafael A Lara; Raquel O Vasconcelos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Anthropogenic noise increases fish mortality by predation.

Authors:  Stephen D Simpson; Andrew N Radford; Sophie L Nedelec; Maud C O Ferrari; Douglas P Chivers; Mark I McCormick; Mark G Meekan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Managers, modelers, and measuring the impact of species distribution model uncertainty on marine zoning decisions.

Authors:  Bryan Costa; Matthew Kendall; Steven McKagan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Fish in habitats with higher motorboat disturbance show reduced sensitivity to motorboat noise.

Authors:  Harry R Harding; Timothy A C Gordon; Rachel E Hsuan; Alex C E Mackaness; Andrew N Radford; Stephen D Simpson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  The effect of motorboat sound on Australian snapper Pagrus auratus inside and outside a marine reserve.

Authors:  Allen F Mensinger; Rosalyn L Putland; Craig A Radford
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Temperate freshwater soundscapes: A cacophony of undescribed biological sounds now threatened by anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Rodney A Rountree; Francis Juanes; Marta Bolgan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Recreational vessels without Automatic Identification System (AIS) dominate anthropogenic noise contributions to a shallow water soundscape.

Authors:  Line Hermannsen; Lonnie Mikkelsen; Jakob Tougaard; Kristian Beedholm; Mark Johnson; Peter T Madsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.