Literature DB >> 24759190

Phonological encoding of young children who stutter.

Kristin M Pelczarski1, J Scott Yaruss2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several empirical studies suggest that children who stutter, when compared to typically fluent peers, demonstrate relatively subtle, yet robust differences in phonological encoding. Phonological encoding can be measured through the use of tasks that reflect the underlying mechanisms of phonological processing, such as phonological awareness. This study investigated the phonological encoding abilities of five- and six-year old children who stutter.
METHODS: Young children who stutter were paired according to language ability, maternal education, and sex to their typically fluent peers. Participants completed multiple measures of phonological awareness abilities (i.e., sound matching, phoneme blending, elision), as well as measures of expressive and receptive vocabulary and articulation.
RESULTS: Young children who stutter performed significantly less well than nonstuttering peers on tasks of elision and sound blending. No between-group differences were found in sound matching abilities or in any of the background language measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that young children who stutter have subtle, yet robust, linguistic differences in certain aspects of phonological encoding that may contribute to an unstable language planning system in young children who stutter. EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES: The reader will be able to: (a) describe how phonological awareness can inform our understanding of phonological encoding; (b) summarize the findings of previously published studies that examined some aspects of phonological awareness in children who do and do not stutter; and (c) compare the results of the current study with other investigations of phonological awareness skills in children who stutter and their typically fluent peers.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phonological awareness; Phonological encoding; Stuttering

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24759190     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fluency Disord        ISSN: 0094-730X            Impact factor:   2.538


  11 in total

1.  Abnormal neural response to phonological working memory demands in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Fanlu Jia; Peter T Fox; Wai Ting Siok; Li Hai Tan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Rhyme Production Strategies Distinguish Stuttering Recovery and Persistence.

Authors:  Katelyn Gerwin; Françoise Brosseau-Lapré; Barbara Brown; Sharon Christ; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Executive function and childhood stuttering: Parent ratings and evidence from a behavioral task.

Authors:  Katerina Ntourou; Julie D Anderson; Stacy A Wagovich
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  Nonword Repetition Performance Differentiates Children Who Stutter With and Without Concomitant Speech Sound and Developmental Language Disorders.

Authors:  Katelyn L Gerwin; Bridget Walsh; Seth E Tichenor
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Neural Indices Mediating Rhyme Discrimination Differ for Some Young Children Who Stutter Regardless of Eventual Recovery or Persistence.

Authors:  Katelyn L Gerwin; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Linguistic aspects of stuttering: research updates on the language-fluency interface.

Authors:  Shelley B Brundage; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  Top Lang Disord       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

7.  What Can Network Science Tell Us About Phonology and Language Processing?

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-04-09

8.  Relationship between Speech Production and Perception in People Who Stutter.

Authors:  Chunming Lu; Yuhang Long; Lifen Zheng; Guang Shi; Li Liu; Guosheng Ding; Peter Howell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Nonword repetition in adults who stutter: The effects of stimuli stress and auditory-orthographic cues.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Coalson; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cortical dynamics of disfluency in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ranit Sengupta; Shalin Shah; Torrey M J Loucks; Kristin Pelczarski; J Scott Yaruss; Katie Gore; Sazzad M Nasir
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.