| Literature DB >> 24757578 |
Hua Miao1, Hua Chen2, Xu Zhang1, Lu Yin2, Dan-Qian Chen2, Xian-Long Cheng3, Xu Bai4, Feng Wei3.
Abstract
Ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight synapt high-definition mass spectrometry metabolomics was used to characterize the urinary metabolic profiling of diet-induced hyperlipidaemia in a rat model. Analysis was done by orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis, correlation analysis, heat map analysis, and KEGG pathways analysis. Potential biomarkers were chosen by S-plot and were identified by accurate mass, isotopic pattern, and MS/MS fragments information. Significant differences in fatty acid, amino acid, nucleoside, and bile acid were observed, indicating the perturbations of fatty acid, amino acid, nucleoside, and bile acid metabolisms in diet-induced hyperlipidaemia rats. This study provides further insight into the metabolic profiling across a wide range of biochemical pathways in response to diet-induced hyperlipidaemia.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24757578 PMCID: PMC3976912 DOI: 10.1155/2014/184162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anal Methods Chem ISSN: 2090-8873 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1Base peak intensity (BPI) chromatograms obtained from the positive ion UPLC-MS analyses of control (a) and diet-induced hyperlipidemia (b) rats.
Figure 2(a) OPLS-DA score plot based on the urinary metabolic profiling of the hyperlipidemia (●) and control (▲) rats; the results indicated that the urinary metabolic pattern was significantly changed in the diet-induced hyperlipidemia rats. (b) S-plot used in our biomarkers selection. The variables marked (□) are the metabolites selected as potential biomarkers. The significant metabolites were selected as potential biomarkers from S-plot and these urinary metabolites are associated with diet-induced hyperlipidemia.
13 biomarkers of hyperlipidemia detected by UPLC Q-TOF/MS in negative ion mode in the 4th week.
| Number | Mass | Metabolite | i-FITa, elemental composition | Molecular weight | Formula | Trendb | Related pathway |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 284.2934 | Octadecanamide | 0.9, C18H38NO | 283.4925 | C18H37NO | ↑** | Fatty acid metabolism |
| 2 | 282.2779 | Oleamide | 1.2, C18H36NO | 281.2718 | C18H35NO | ↑** | Fatty acid metabolism |
| 3 | 188.0713 | Tryptophan | 0.9, C11H10N1O2 | 204.2252 | C11H12N2O2 | ↑** | Amino acid metabolism |
| 4 | 193.1235 | Citric acid | 0.7, C6H9O7 | 192.1243 | C6H8O7 | ↓** | TCA cycle |
| 5 | 330.0618 | Adenosine 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate | 1.0, C10H13N5O6P | 329.2059 | C10H12N5O6P | ↓** | Purine metabolism |
| 6 | 393.3002 | Ursodeoxycholic acid | 0.8, C24H41O4 | 392.5720 | C24H40O4 | ↑** | Bile acid metabolism |
| 7 | 114.0641 | Creatinine | 1.2, C4H8N3O | 113.1179 | C4H7N3O | ↑** | Energy metabolism |
| 8 | 281.0979 | Ascorbalamic acid | 0.9, C9H17N2O8 | 263.2014 | C9H13NO8 | ↑** | Carbohydrate metabolism |
| 9 | 259.0913 | 3-Methyluridine | 1.2, C10H15N2O6 | 258.228 | C10H14N2O6 | ↑** | Nucleoside metabolism |
| 10 | 212.1025 | 3-O-Methyldopa | 1.7, C10H14NO4 | 211.2145 | C10H13NO4 | ↓** | Amino acid metabolism |
| 11 | 162.1108 | Proline | 0.7, C7H13O3 | 115.1305 | C7H12O3 | ↓** | Amino acid metabolism |
| 12 | 282.1216 | 1-Methyladenosine | 1.2, C11H16N5O4 | 281.2679 | C11H15N5O4 | ↓** | Nucleoside metabolism |
| 13 | 162.0538 | Indole-3-carboxylic acid | 0.8, C9H8NO2 | 161.1574 | C9H7NO2 | ↑** | Amino acid metabolism |
| 14 | 368.1594 | Tryptophyl-tyrosine | 1.2, C20H22N3O4 | 367.3984 | C20H21N3O4 | ↑** | Amino acid metabolism |
| 15 | 166.0708 | Phenylalanine | 0.9, C9H12NO2 | 165.1891 | C9H11NO2 | ↓** | Amino acid metabolism |
| 16 | 126.0643 | 5-Methylcytosine | 1.3, C5H8N3O | 125.1286 | C5H7N3O | ↓** | Nucleoside metabolism |
ai-FIT; the i-FIT is the correctness of isotope patterns of elemental composition. The lower i-FIT normalized values mean high precision of the elemental composition; bchange trend of hyperlipidemia rats versus control rats. The potential biomarkers were labeled with (↓) downregulated and (↑) upregulated. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.
Figure 3(a) Comparison of the relative intensity and (b) OPLS-DA loading plot of putative potential biomarkers in control and diet-induced hyperlipidaemia rats. The loading plots represent which metabolites are quantitatively higher or lower in diet-induced hyperlipidaemia rats compared with control rats. Numbers consist with Table 1.
Figure 4Correlation analysis (a) of the differential metabolites in control rats and diet-induced hyperlipidaemia rats. Heat map (b) for identified metabolites in control rats and diet-induced hyperlipidaemia rats. The color of each section is proportional to the significance of change of metabolites (red, upregulated; green, downregulated). Rows: samples; columns: metabolites. Numbers consist with Table 1.