OBJECTIVE: To identify a molecular signature that could be predictive of the clinical response to rituximab (RTX) and elucidate the transcriptomic changes after RTX therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with the use of whole-blood transcriptomic profiling. METHODS: A microarray assay of the whole human genome was performed using RNA from peripheral blood samples obtained before the first cycle of RTX from 68 patients with RA in the SMART study. The transcriptomic profile was also assessed 24 weeks after the first administration of RTX (among 24 nonresponders and 44 responders, according to the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria at week 24). Ingenuity Interactive Pathways Analysis was used to identify molecular pathways that were modified by RTX therapy according to the clinical response. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed to confirm the microarray results. RESULTS: In total, 198 genes showed significant baseline differential expression between patient groups according to their subsequent response to RTX (good or moderate responder versus nonresponder). This molecular signature could be reduced to 143 genes, which allowed for correctly classifying 89% of the patients by their EULAR response status at week 24, with 93% identification of responders and 100% identification of nonresponders. The signature for response featured up-regulation of inflammatory genes centered on NF-κB, including IL33 and STAT5A, and down-regulation of the interferon pathway. As expected, at week 24 post-RTX therapy, genes involved in the development and functions of B cells were the genes most strongly down-regulated, without any difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Whole-blood transcriptomic analyses may accurately identify patients with RA who will not respond to RTX therapy. These findings could open new perspectives on the clinical management of RA.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To identify a molecular signature that could be predictive of the clinical response to rituximab (RTX) and elucidate the transcriptomic changes after RTX therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with the use of whole-blood transcriptomic profiling. METHODS: A microarray assay of the whole human genome was performed using RNA from peripheral blood samples obtained before the first cycle of RTX from 68 patients with RA in the SMART study. The transcriptomic profile was also assessed 24 weeks after the first administration of RTX (among 24 nonresponders and 44 responders, according to the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria at week 24). Ingenuity Interactive Pathways Analysis was used to identify molecular pathways that were modified by RTX therapy according to the clinical response. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed to confirm the microarray results. RESULTS: In total, 198 genes showed significant baseline differential expression between patient groups according to their subsequent response to RTX (good or moderate responder versus nonresponder). This molecular signature could be reduced to 143 genes, which allowed for correctly classifying 89% of the patients by their EULAR response status at week 24, with 93% identification of responders and 100% identification of nonresponders. The signature for response featured up-regulation of inflammatory genes centered on NF-κB, including IL33 and STAT5A, and down-regulation of the interferon pathway. As expected, at week 24 post-RTX therapy, genes involved in the development and functions of B cells were the genes most strongly down-regulated, without any difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Whole-blood transcriptomic analyses may accurately identify patients with RA who will not respond to RTX therapy. These findings could open new perspectives on the clinical management of RA.
Authors: Dana E Orange; Vicky Yao; Kirsty Sawicka; John Fak; Mayu O Frank; Salina Parveen; Nathalie E Blachere; Caryn Hale; Fan Zhang; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Olga G Troyanskaya; Robert B Darnell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James T Rosenbaum; Cailin H Sibley; Dongseok Choi; Christina A Harrington; Stephen R Planck Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Ty M Thomson; Reynald M Lescarbeau; David A Drubin; Daphna Laifenfeld; David de Graaf; David A Fryburg; Bruce Littman; Renée Deehan; Aaron Van Hooser Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Ignacio Ortea; Bernd Roschitzki; Rosario López-Rodríguez; Eva G Tomero; Juan G Ovalles; Javier López-Longo; Inmaculada de la Torre; Isidoro González-Alvaro; Juan J Gómez-Reino; Antonio González Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 3.240