| Literature DB >> 24756113 |
Simona Daniele1, Sabrina Taliani1, Eleonora Da Pozzo1, Chiara Giacomelli1, Barbara Costa1, Maria Letizia Trincavelli1, Leonardo Rossi2, Valeria La Pietra3, Elisabetta Barresi1, Alfonso Carotenuto3, Antonio Limatola3, Anna Lamberti4, Luciana Marinelli3, Ettore Novellino3, Federico Da Settimo1, Claudia Martini1.
Abstract
In the complex scenario ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24756113 PMCID: PMC3996484 DOI: 10.1038/srep04749
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Docking poses of Compound 1 in the MDM2 binding site.
The ligand is represented as golden stick, the protein residues and surface as cyan sticks and transparent blue respectively. MDM2 binding pockets are labeled according to p53 side chains and are highlight in red dots.
Figure 2Scheme of synthesis of novel indolylglyoxylyldipeptides.
Figure 3New synthesized compounds bind to TSPO and induce Δψm collapse.
(A) [H]PK11195 radioligand binding: membranes homogenates obtained from kidney (20 μg of proteins) were incubated with 0.6 nM [3H]PK11195 and different compounds concentration. Reaching equilibrium, samples were filtered and bound radioactivity was counted. Data are expressed as percentage of specific binding versus basal value (set to 100%) and represent the mean ± SEM of three different experiments. (B) Evaluation of Δψm in isolated mitochondria: Mitochondria (5 μg of proteins) were treated with compound 1 (5 μM), or compound 7 (5 μM), or DMSO (control) for 15 min. The Δψm was evaluated using JC-1 protocol as describe in Methods. The data are expressed as variation of JC1 uptake into mitochondria, calculated as the difference between RFU read after 10 minutes and RFU read at the beginning. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three different experiments. Each experiment was performed in duplicate. Statistical significance was determined with a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test:**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs control. (C) Representative graph of mitochondria potential evaluation using JC-1 protocol. The results were expressed as RFU units in time.
Figure 4Dissociation of recombinant MDM2/p53 complex by NMR studies.
One-dimensional proton spectrum of the side chains of tryptophans (W) of p53 alone (a), MDM2/p53 complex (b), MDM2/p53 complex after addition of compound 7 (c), or compound 1 (d). Figure shows the 1H NMR signals of the tryptophan residues of p53 and of MDM2/p53 complex (0.1 mM, only W53 NHε side chains signal can be detected in the last). After the addition of compound 7 or 1 (0.2 mM formal final concentration) to the MDM2/p53 complex, the W23 peak appears (c and d, respectively) indicating a complete p53 release.
Figure 5ELISA-based in vitro MDM2/p53 protein-protein interaction assay.
(A), (B) Different amount of cell lysates (panel A) or human recombinant MDM2/p53 protein (panel B) were captured on wells pre-coated with MDM2 antibody. After extensive washes, levels of the MDM2/p53 complex were quantified using an antibody specific for p53, and subsequently an HRP-conjugated antibody and a TMB substrate kit. (C), (D) U87MG cell lysates, containing the native MDM2/p53 complex, were pre-incubated with DMSO (control) or different concentrations of the indicated compounds. Then, lysates were captured on wells pre-coated with MDM2 antibody. After extensive washes, levels of the MDM2/p53 complex were quantified using an antibody specific for p53, and subsequently an HRP-conjugated antibody and a TMB substrate kit. Blank wells were obtained in the absence of p53 antibody. Data are expressed as absorbance at 450 nm minus blank values (A), (B), or as % of control set to 100% (C), (D), and represent the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments.
Figure 6New synthesized compounds induce p53 protein accumulation by dissociation of MDM2/p53 complex and stimulate transcription of p53 target genes in U87MG cells.
The U87MG cells were treated with DMSO (control sample) or the indicated concentrations of the compound 1 or 7 for 12 h. Lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis using antibody to p53 (FL-393; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). One representative Western blot is presented (panel (A) for each cell treatment. β-actin was used as the loading control. The bar graph (panel (B) shows the quantitative analysis of the Western blots, performed using ImageJ. Data are expressed as the percentage of OD versus control set to 100% and represent the mean ± SEM of three different experiments. Statistical significance was determined with a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test: *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs Control; (C) Evaluation of MDM2/p53 complex: U87MG cells were incubated with compound 1 (5 μM) for 8 h followed by immunoprecipitation using an anti-MDM2 antibody. The MDM2/p53 complex and the relative input of the proteins were detected by immunoblot. One representative Western blot is presented (left panel). The bar graph (right panel) shows the quantitative analysis of the Western blot, performed using ImageJ. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three different experiments. **P < 0.01 vs Control. Full-length blots are reported in Supplementary Information section titled “Full-length blots relative to the cropped images showed in the main Figures”. (D) Relative mRNA quantification of p53 target genes: The relative mRNA quantification of p53 target genes (p21 and MDM2) was performed by real-time RT-PCR as describe in Methods. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three different experiments. Each experiment was performed in duplicate. Statistical significance was determined with a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs Control.
Figure 7New synthesize compounds trigger checkpoint-dependent cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in U87MG cells.
U87MG cells were treated with compounds (5 μM) or DMSO (control) for 24 h. After incubation time, tumor cells were employed for cell cycle analyses (panel A, B) and SA-β-Gal senescence marker (panel C). The cell cycle analyses was performed as describe in Methods. Representative cell cycle histograms of untreated and treated cells were shown (panel A). The data are presented as percentage of cell in the different phases (G0/G1, G2 or S) versus total cell number. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three different experiments. Statistical significance was determined with a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test: *P < 0.05 vs Control G0/G1 cells, #P < 0.05 vs Control G2 cells, §P < 0.05 vs Control S cells. (C) Representative images of SA-β-Gal-expressing cells: The panel shows the SA-β-Gal-expressing MDM2 inhibitor-treated and untreated cells at 24 h. (D) Evaluation of apoptotic cells: U87MG cells were treated with 5 μM Compound 1 or 10 μM Nutlin-3 for 4–16–24 h. After incubation time cells were collected and the phosphatydilserine externalization was evaluated using Annexin V protocol as describe in Methods. The data are expressed as percentage of apoptotic cells (Early-apoptotic in white, late-apoptotic/necrotic in grey) versus the total number of cells. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three different experiments. Statistical significance was determined with a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs Control. (E) Relative mRNA quantification of PUMA: U87MG cells were treated with Compound 1 or Nutlin-3 for 16–24 h. The relative mRNA quantification of PUMA was performed by real-time RT-PCR as describe in Methods. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three different experiments. Each experiment was performed in duplicate. Statistical significance was determined with a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test: **P < 0.01 vs Control.
Figure 8New synthesized compounds exert dissipation of Δψm and a dose dependent antitumoral effect intact U87MG cells.
(A) Evaluation of Δψm in U87MG cells: U87MG cells were treated for 24 h with 5 μM compound 1, or 5 μM compound 7, or 10 μM Nutlin-3, or 10 μM PK1195, or a combination of Nutlin-3 and PK11195. After incubation time, mitochondria were isolated and the Δψm (for 5 μg of proteins) was evaluated using JC-1 protocol as describe in Methods. The data are expressed as the variation of JC1 uptake into mitochondria, calculated as the difference between RFU at the beginning and those read after 10 minutes. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three different experiments. Each experiment was performed in duplicate. Statistical significance was determined with a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test: **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs Control; §§§P < 0.001 vs PK11195 alone; #P < 0.05, ###P < 0.001 vs Nutlin-3 alone. (B) Representative graph of mitochondria potential evaluation using JC-1 protocol. The results were expressed as RFU units in time. (C), (D) Evaluation of in vitro anti-proliferative effect: the U87MG cells were treated with increasing concentrations of the compound 1, 7, PK11195 or Nutlin-3, or PK11195 (10 μM) and Nutlin-3 (10 μM) in combination, and the viable cells were counted after 24 h of treatment by Trypan blue exclusion assay. The data were expresses as percentage of compound-treated viable cells respect to control viable cells. Curves were generated using a sigmoidal dose-response curve model (GraphPad Prism 4 software) from which the IC50 values were derived. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three different experiments. Each experiment was performed in duplicate. Statistical significance was determined with a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test: *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs Control; §§§P < 0.001 vs PK11195 alone; ###P < 0.001 vs Nultlin-3 alone.