Literature DB >> 24755867

Clinical measures associated with dynamic balance and functional movement.

Deydre S Teyhen1, Scott W Shaffer, Chelsea L Lorenson, Moshe D Greenberg, Shay M Rogers, Christina M Koreerat, Sarah L Villena, Kristen L Zosel, Michael J Walker, John C Childs.   

Abstract

Decreased balance and impaired functional movement have been linked with increased injury risk. The purpose of our study was to determine the association between specific measures of power, strength, flexibility, balance, and endurance compared with more global measures of dynamic balance, using the Y-Balance Test (YBT), and functional movement, using the functional movement screen (FMS), in healthy soldiers. Our participants (n = 64; 53 men, 11 women) were healthy active duty service members (25.2 ± 3.8 years, 25.1 ± 3.1 kg·m(-2)). Seventeen tests with 38 associated measures of strength, power, flexibility, endurance, balance, and functional measures were assessed. A significant Pearson product moment correlation (r > 0.2 and p < 0.01) was used to narrow the number of variables of interest. Two hierarchical stepwise regression analyses were performed to determine the most parsimonious set of variables associated with the YBT and FMS performance scores. Our results included a 4 variable model (F = 13.4, p < 0.001) that was associated with YBT scores (R = 0.72, R2 = 0.51). Superior performance on the YBT was associated with better performance on the FMS lunge and upper trunk mobility tests, decreased number of hops during a 6-m hop test, and greater gastrocnemius flexibility. A second 4 variable model (F = 11.813, p < 0.001) was associated with FMS scores (R = 0.70, R2 = 0.50). Superior performance on the FMS was associated with greater anterior reach on the YBT, greater distance on the crossover hop test, increased hamstring flexibility, and higher levels of self-reported function through the lower-extremity functional scale. Physical fitness leaders and clinicians could use these models to inform decision making when developing and assessing the outcomes of a personalized intervention program for those with low FMS and YBT scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24755867     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  18 in total

1.  PREDICTION OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ PERFORMANCE FROM LOWER EXTREMITY RANGE OF MOTION AND CORE TESTS.

Authors:  Nicole J Chimera; Shelby Knoeller; Ron Cooper; Nicholas Kothe; Craig Smith; Meghan Warren
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04

2.  THERE ARE NO BIOMECHANICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RUNNERS CLASSIFIED BY THE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ribeiro de Oliveira; Shalimá Figueirêdo Chaves; Yuri Lopes Lima; Márcio Almeida Bezerra; Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida; Pedro Olavo de Paula Lima
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

3.  Trauma Exposure and Functional Movement Characteristics of Male Tactical Athletes.

Authors:  Marcus K Taylor; Lisa M Hernández; Pinata H Sessoms; Colton Kawamura; John J Fraser
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The Interrelationship of Common Clinical Movement Screens: Establishing Population-Specific Norms in a Large Cohort of Military Applicants.

Authors:  Sarah J de la Motte; Timothy C Gribbin; Peter Lisman; Anthony I Beutler; Patricia Deuster
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  What Risk Factors Are Associated With Musculoskeletal Injury in US Army Rangers? A Prospective Prognostic Study.

Authors:  Deydre S Teyhen; Scott W Shaffer; Robert J Butler; Stephen L Goffar; Kyle B Kiesel; Daniel I Rhon; Jared N Williamson; Phillip J Plisky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Performance on the Functional Movement Screen Is Related to Hop Performance But Not to Hip and Knee Strength in Collegiate Football Players.

Authors:  Nienke Willigenburg; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.638

7.  THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREENTM, Y-BALANCE TEST, AND PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE TESTS IN MALE AND FEMALE HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETES.

Authors:  Taylor A Kramer; Ryan S Sacko; Craig E Pfeifer; Dustin R Gatens; Justin M Goins; David F Stodden
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-12

8.  Identification of Risk Factors Prospectively Associated With Musculoskeletal Injury in a Warrior Athlete Population.

Authors:  Deydre S Teyhen; Scott W Shaffer; Stephen L Goffar; Kyle Kiesel; Robert J Butler; Daniel I Rhon; Phillip J Plisky
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  THE LOWER EXTREMITY GRADING SYSTEM (LEGS) TO EVALUATE BASELINE LOWER EXTREMITY PERFORMANCE IN HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETES.

Authors:  Joseph Smith; Nick DePhillipo; Shannon Azizi; Andrew McCabe; Courtney Beverine; Michael Orendurff; Stephanie Pun; Charles Chan
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06

10.  STATIC BALANCE MEASUREMENTS IN STABLE AND UNSTABLE CONDITIONS DO NOT DISCRIMINATE GROUPS OF YOUNG ADULTS ASSESSED BY THE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ (FMS™).

Authors:  Matheus A Trindade; Aline Martins de Toledo; Jefferson Rosa Cardoso; Igor Eduardo Souza; Felipe Augusto Dos Santos Mendes; Luisiane A Santana; Rodrigo Luiz Carregaro
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.