Literature DB >> 24755330

Effect of aortic aneurysm replacement on outcomes after bicuspid aortic valve surgery: validation of contemporary guidelines.

Daniel Rinewalt1, Patrick M McCarthy2, Sukit Chris Malaisrie1, Paul W M Fedak3, Adin-Cristian Andrei1, Jyothy J Puthumana4, Robert O Bonow4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is associated with aortic dilatation and aneurysm (AN) formation. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2006 guidelines recommend replacement of the ascending aorta for an aortic diameter (AD)> 45 mm in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). We evaluated the outcomes of AVR and AVR with aortic replacement (AVR/AN).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed (2004-2011) the data from 456 patients with BAV and compared the morbidity and mortality between the AVR and AVR/AN groups and 3 subgroups: AVR with an AD<45 mm; AVR/AN with an AD of 45 to 49 mm; and AVR/AN with an AD of ≥50 mm. Propensity score matching was used to reduce bias.
RESULTS: Of the 456 patients, 250 (55%) underwent AVR and 206 (45%) AVR/AN, with 98% compliance with the current guidelines. The overall 30-day mortality was 0.9%. The AVR AD<45-mm group had adjusted short- and medium-term survival similar to that of the AVR/AN AD 45- to 49-mm and AVR/AN AD≥50-mm groups, with a 30-day mortality of 0.8%, 0%, and 1.9%, respectively (P=.41). The propensity score-matched AVR/AN AD≥50-mm group had significantly greater rates of reintubation than either the AVR AD<45-mm (P=.012) or AVR/AN AD 45- to 49-mm (P=.04) group and greater rates of prolonged ventilation (P=.022) than the AVR AD<45-mm group. No significant differences were found in reoperation or myocardial infarction among the subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with undergoing AVR, no increase was seen in morbidity or mortality when adding aortic replacement with an AD of 45 to 49 mm, in accordance with the 2006 ACC/AHA guidelines, although the AVR/AN AD≥50-mm group had a greater risk of respiratory complications. Our findings indicate that compliance with the ACC/AHA guidelines is safe in select centers.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24755330     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  9 in total

1.  Aortic Dissection in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve-Associated Aneurysms.

Authors:  Charles M Wojnarski; Lars G Svensson; Eric E Roselli; Jay J Idrees; Ashley M Lowry; John Ehrlinger; Gösta B Pettersson; A Marc Gillinov; Douglas R Johnston; Edward G Soltesz; Jose L Navia; Donald F Hammer; Brian Griffin; Maran Thamilarasan; Vidyasagar Kalahasti; Joseph F Sabik; Eugene H Blackstone; Bruce W Lytle
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Surgical repair of bicuspid aortopathy at small diameters: Clinical and institutional factors.

Authors:  Alexander P Nissen; Van Thi Thanh Truong; Bader A Alhafez; Jyothy J Puthumana; Anthony L Estrera; Simon C Body; Siddharth K Prakash
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  Year in review: bicuspid aortopathy.

Authors:  Paul W M Fedak; Alex J Barker; Subodh Verma
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version.

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Paul W M Fedak; Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas G Gleason; Evaldas Girdauskas; John S Ikonomidis; Ali Khoynezhad; Samuel C Siu; Subodh Verma; Michael D Hope; Duke E Cameron; Donald F Hammer; Joseph S Coselli; Marc R Moon; Thoralf M Sundt; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Should sinus of Valsalva be preserved in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and aortic dilation?

Authors:  Yulin Wang; Yi Lin; Kanhua Yin; Kai Zhu; Zhaohua Yang; Yongxin Sun; Hao Lai; Chunsheng Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease - the influence of valve morphotype on age at and types of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Michelle S Lim; David S Celermajer; Paul G Bannon
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-04-26

7.  Applications of a Specialty Bicuspid Aortic Valve Program: Clinical Continuity and Translational Collaboration.

Authors:  Erin E Crawford; Patrick M McCarthy; S Chris Malaisrie; Jyothy J Puthumana; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Menghan Liu; Adin-Cristian Andrei; David G Guzzardi; Jane Kruse; Paul W M Fedak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  The need for comprehensive multidisciplinary programs, complex interventions, and precision medicine for bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Erin E Crawford; Patrick M McCarthy; S Chris Malaisrie; Christopher K Mehta; Jyothy J Puthumana; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Robert O Bonow; Paul W M Fedak
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-07

9.  Valve-Related Hemodynamics Mediate Human Bicuspid Aortopathy: Insights From Wall Shear Stress Mapping.

Authors:  David G Guzzardi; Alex J Barker; Pim van Ooij; S Chris Malaisrie; Jyothy J Puthumana; Darrell D Belke; Holly E M Mewhort; Daniyil A Svystonyuk; Sean Kang; Subodh Verma; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; Robert O Bonow; Michael Markl; James D Thomas; Patrick M McCarthy; Paul W M Fedak
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 24.094

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.