Literature DB >> 24755323

Use of an electrocardiographic screening tool to determine candidacy for a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Christopher A Groh1, Shishir Sharma1, Daniel J Pelchovitz1, Prashant D Bhave1, John Rhyner1, Nishant Verma1, Rishi Arora1, Alexandru B Chicos1, Susan S Kim1, Albert C Lin1, Rod S Passman1, Bradley P Knight2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An electrocardiographic (ECG) screening test has been developed to identify patients being considered for a totally subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) at risk for T-wave oversensing.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of potential S-ICD recipients who fail the ECG screening test and to identify predictors of failure.
METHODS: Patients who already have an ICD but are not receiving antibradycardia pacing are representative of patients who might be considered for an S-ICD. One hundred such outpatients were enrolled in the study. Surface rhythm strips were recorded along the sensing vectors of the S-ICD system and the screening template applied. Clinical and standard ECG characteristics of patients who failed the test were compared to those who passed.
RESULTS: Patients had the following characteristics: 72% male, age 57 ± 16 years, body mass index 29 ± 6 kg/m(2), left ventricular ejection fraction 43% ± 17%, QRS duration 109 ± 23 ms, QTc interval 447 ± 39 ms, 44% had coronary disease, and 55% had heart failure. Among the 100 patients, 8% failed the screening test. There were no differences in patient clinical characteristics and most standard ECG measurements. However, patients with T-wave inversions in standard ECG leads I, II, and aVF had a 45% chance of failing.
CONCLUSION: Eight percent of potential S-ICD patients were not eligible for the S-ICD after failing the screening test designed to identify patients susceptible to T-wave oversensing. Patients with T-wave inversions in leads I, II, and aVF on a standard ECG were 23 times more likely to fail. More work is needed in S-ICD sensing algorithms to increase patient eligibility for the S-ICD.
Copyright © 2014 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defibrillator screening; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Inappropriate shocks; Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; T-wave oversensing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24755323     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  21 in total

1.  The Entirely Subcutaneous Defibrillator - A New Generation and Future Expectations.

Authors:  Hussam Ali; Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  The subcutaneous ICD-current evidence and challenges.

Authors:  Kiran Haresh Kumar Patel; Pier D Lambiase
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-12

3.  Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator eligibility according to a novel automated screening tool and agreement with the standard manual electrocardiographic morphology tool.

Authors:  Pietro Francia; Matteo Ziacchi; Paolo De Filippo; Stefano Viani; Antonio D'Onofrio; Vincenzo Russo; Carmen Adduci; Mauro Biffi; Paola Ferrari; Valter Bianchi; Ernesto Ammendola; Francesca Palano; Jessica Frisoni; Sergio Valsecchi; Mariolina Lovecchio; Maria Grazia Bongiorni
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Analysis of Screening Electrocardiogram for the Subcutaneous Defibrillator in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Vincent C Thomas; Mark Peterson; Martin McDaniel; Humberto Restrepo; Abraham Rothman; Amit Jain
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 5.  Clinical experience with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Lewis; Michael R Gold
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Dialytic interval and the timing of electrocardiographic screening for subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator placement in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Cindy You; Shishir Sharma; Aakash Bavishi; Christopher A Groh; Yazan Alia; Basil Saour; Rod Passman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Right versus left parasternal electrode position in the entirely subcutaneous ICD.

Authors:  Markus Bettin; Dirk Dechering; Gerrit Frommeyer; Robert Larbig; Andreas Löher; Florian Reinke; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  ICD Therapy for Primary Prevention in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Amar Trivedi; Bradley P Knight
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016

9.  The utility of routine clinical 12-lead ECG in assessing eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Jason A Thomas; Erick Andres Perez-Alday; Christopher Hamilton; Muammar M Kabir; Eugene A Park; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.589

10.  Long-term follow-up of subcutaneous ICD systems in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Gerrit Frommeyer; Dirk G Dechering; Sven Zumhagen; Andreas Löher; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt; Florian Reinke
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.