BACKGROUND: An electrocardiographic (ECG) screening test has been developed to identify patients being considered for a totally subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) at risk for T-wave oversensing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of potential S-ICD recipients who fail the ECG screening test and to identify predictors of failure. METHODS: Patients who already have an ICD but are not receiving antibradycardia pacing are representative of patients who might be considered for an S-ICD. One hundred such outpatients were enrolled in the study. Surface rhythm strips were recorded along the sensing vectors of the S-ICD system and the screening template applied. Clinical and standard ECG characteristics of patients who failed the test were compared to those who passed. RESULTS: Patients had the following characteristics: 72% male, age 57 ± 16 years, body mass index 29 ± 6 kg/m(2), left ventricular ejection fraction 43% ± 17%, QRS duration 109 ± 23 ms, QTc interval 447 ± 39 ms, 44% had coronary disease, and 55% had heart failure. Among the 100 patients, 8% failed the screening test. There were no differences in patient clinical characteristics and most standard ECG measurements. However, patients with T-wave inversions in standard ECG leads I, II, and aVF had a 45% chance of failing. CONCLUSION: Eight percent of potential S-ICD patients were not eligible for the S-ICD after failing the screening test designed to identify patients susceptible to T-wave oversensing. Patients with T-wave inversions in leads I, II, and aVF on a standard ECG were 23 times more likely to fail. More work is needed in S-ICD sensing algorithms to increase patient eligibility for the S-ICD.
BACKGROUND: An electrocardiographic (ECG) screening test has been developed to identify patients being considered for a totally subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) at risk for T-wave oversensing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of potential S-ICD recipients who fail the ECG screening test and to identify predictors of failure. METHODS:Patients who already have an ICD but are not receiving antibradycardia pacing are representative of patients who might be considered for an S-ICD. One hundred such outpatients were enrolled in the study. Surface rhythm strips were recorded along the sensing vectors of the S-ICD system and the screening template applied. Clinical and standard ECG characteristics of patients who failed the test were compared to those who passed. RESULTS:Patients had the following characteristics: 72% male, age 57 ± 16 years, body mass index 29 ± 6 kg/m(2), left ventricular ejection fraction 43% ± 17%, QRS duration 109 ± 23 ms, QTc interval 447 ± 39 ms, 44% had coronary disease, and 55% had heart failure. Among the 100 patients, 8% failed the screening test. There were no differences in patient clinical characteristics and most standard ECG measurements. However, patients with T-wave inversions in standard ECG leads I, II, and aVF had a 45% chance of failing. CONCLUSION: Eight percent of potential S-ICD patients were not eligible for the S-ICD after failing the screening test designed to identify patients susceptible to T-wave oversensing. Patients with T-wave inversions in leads I, II, and aVF on a standard ECG were 23 times more likely to fail. More work is needed in S-ICD sensing algorithms to increase patient eligibility for the S-ICD.
Authors: Vincent C Thomas; Mark Peterson; Martin McDaniel; Humberto Restrepo; Abraham Rothman; Amit Jain Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Markus Bettin; Dirk Dechering; Gerrit Frommeyer; Robert Larbig; Andreas Löher; Florian Reinke; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Jason A Thomas; Erick Andres Perez-Alday; Christopher Hamilton; Muammar M Kabir; Eugene A Park; Larisa G Tereshchenko Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Gerrit Frommeyer; Dirk G Dechering; Sven Zumhagen; Andreas Löher; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt; Florian Reinke Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-08-02 Impact factor: 5.460