In an effort to characterize the roles of each metal ion in metallo-β-lactamase NDM-1, heterodimetallic analogues (CoCo-, ZnCo-, and CoCd-) of the enzyme were generated and characterized. UV-vis, (1)H NMR, EPR, and EXAFS spectroscopies were used to confirm the fidelity of the metal substitutions, including the presence of a homogeneous, heterodimetallic cluster, with a single-atom bridge. This marks the first preparation of a metallo-β-lactamase selectively substituted with a paramagnetic metal ion, Co(II), either in the Zn1 (CoCd-NDM-1) or in the Zn2 site (ZnCo-NDM-1), as well as both (CoCo-NDM-1). We then used these metal-substituted forms of the enzyme to probe the reaction mechanism, using steady-state and stopped-flow kinetics, stopped-flow fluorescence, and rapid-freeze-quench EPR. Both metal sites show significant effects on the kinetic constants, and both paramagnetic variants (CoCd- and ZnCo-NDM-1) showed significant structural changes on reaction with substrate. These changes are discussed in terms of a minimal kinetic mechanism that incorporates all of the data.
In an effort to characterize the roles of each metal ion in metallo-β-lactamase NDM-1, heterodimetallic analogues (CoCo-, ZnCo-, and CoCd-) of the enzyme were generated and characterized. UV-vis, (1)H NMR, EPR, and EXAFS spectroscopies were used to confirm the fidelity of the metal substitutions, including the presence of a homogeneous, heterodimetallic cluster, with a single-atom bridge. This marks the first preparation of a metallo-β-lactamase selectively substituted with a paramagnetic metal ion, Co(II), either in the Zn1 (CoCd-NDM-1) or in the Zn2 site (ZnCo-NDM-1), as well as both (CoCo-NDM-1). We then used these metal-substituted forms of the enzyme to probe the reaction mechanism, using steady-state and stopped-flow kinetics, stopped-flow fluorescence, and rapid-freeze-quench EPR. Both metal sites show significant effects on the kinetic constants, and both paramagnetic variants (CoCd- and ZnCo-NDM-1) showed significant structural changes on reaction with substrate. These changes are discussed in terms of a minimal kinetic mechanism that incorporates all of the data.
β-Lactam-containing antibiotics
that target bacterial cell wall synthesis, such as penicillins, cephalosporins,
and carbapenems, remain the cheapest and some of the most effective
antimicrobial agents available,[1] representing
more than 50% of the antibiotics prescribed worldwide. The selective
pressure applied by their wide and extensive application has resulted
in resistance,[2] conferred by the production
of β-lactamases. More than 1,000 β-lactamases have been
isolated, and these enzymes have been categorized into four classes
based on amino acid sequence.[1,3] Classes A, C, and D,
also known as the serine-β-lactamases (SβLs), use an active
site serine to perform nucleophilic attack on the β-lactam carbonyl,
forming a covalent enzyme–substrate adduct, and these enzymes
generally display very narrow substrate profiles, although examples
of SβLs with broad activity have recently been reported.[4,5] In contrast, Class B β-lactamases, also known as the metallo-β-lactamases
(MβLs), require either 1 or 2 equiv of Zn(II) for full catalytic
activity, and these enzymes hydrolyze all clinical β-lactam-containing
compounds. The MβLs have been further divided into subclasses
B1–B3, based on sequence homology.[6]Although SβLs are more clinically prevalent than MβLs,
they remain sensitive to an array of mechanism-based inhibitors, such
as clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam. The MβLs are
generally insensitive to SβL inhibitors, and no clinical inhibitors
exist for these enzymes. A number of clinically important bacterial
strains have been reported to produce chromosomally encoded MβLs,
such as Bacillus cereus (BcII),[7]Bacteroides fragilis (CcrA),[8]Elizabethkingia meningoseptica (BlaB),[9] and Stenotrophomonas
maltophilia (L1).[10] Several plasmid-encoded
MβLs, such as IMP[11] and VIM[12] variants, have been shown to horizontally transfer
to other pathogenic bacteria. NDM-1 was initially discovered in Klebsiella pneumonia. Like blaIMP-1 and blaVIM-1, blaNDM-1 has been shown to be horizontally transferable.[13] Clinical strains of Enterobacteriaceae and A. baumannii now harbor the blaNDM-1 gene.[14−16] IMP, VIM, and NDM are all class
B1 MβLs, by far the most abundant and clinically relevant subclass
of the MβLs.[17−19]The native Zn(II)-containing MβLs are
accessible only by X-ray crystallography and X-ray absorption spectroscopy
(XAS). Substitution of the active site Zn(II) with Co(II) is a common
practice, as it makes the enzymes amenable to NMR, EPR, and UV–vis
spectroscopies, allowing for more detailed structural and mechanistic
studies. However, as all known examples of B1 MβLs bind 2 equiv
of divalent metal tightly, spectroscopic signatures from fully substituted
enzymes are difficult to assign to specific metal sites (Zn1 or Zn2, Figure 1; for clarity,
we will refer to all metal-substituted variants in numerical order,
that is, ZnCo refers to Zn(II) in the Zn1 site and Co(II)
in the Zn2 site). While heterodimetallic forms are desirable,
well-characterized examples are relatively few. Vila and co-workers
first reported spectroscopic studies on a mixed-metal (ZnCo) form
of BcII.[20] More recently, we reported spectroscopic
studies on the ZnCo form of the B3 MβL L1.[21] However, structural and catalytic features specific to
the Zn1 site cannot be established without a complementary
form of the enzyme that incorporates a paramagnetic metal ion in the
Zn1 site and a diamagnetic metal ion in the Zn2 site.
Figure 1
Active site structure of NDM-1 based on the current spectroscopic
studies, with the ligand arrangement based on the X-ray structure
of NDM-1 (Strynadka, et al.).[50]
Active site structure of NDM-1 based on the current spectroscopic
studies, with the ligand arrangement based on the X-ray structure
of NDM-1 (Strynadka, et al.).[50]We report here the preparation, characterization,
and mechanistic investigation of several heterodimetallic forms of
the MβL NDM-1, in an effort to establish the functional roles
of each metal ion. The reaction of these mixed-metal forms with chromacef
was followed using rapid-freeze-quench (RFQ) EPR, allowing a detailed
assessment of the coordination environment of each metal binding site,
independently, during the formation and decay of a key ring-opened
reaction intermediate that is commonly formed by most MβLs with
chormacef or nitrocefin as substrate (a similar intermediate has been
reported in the reaction of BcII with penicillin[22] and imipenem[23]). The minimal
reaction mechanism developed here is discussed in light of the available
data on NDM-1, both reported previously[19,24] and herein.
Experimental Procedures
Materials
Escherichia coli strains DH5a and BL21(DE3) were
purchased from Novagen (Madison, WI). Restriction enzymes, NdeI and XhoI, were purchased from New
England Biolabs. Luria–Bertani (LB) medium was purchased from
Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside
(IPTG) was purchased from Anatrace (Maumee, OH). Chromacef was purchased
from Sopharmia, Inc. All buffer solutions and growth media were made
with Barnstead NANOpure water. Kinetic and spectroscopic studies were
conducted in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.0) containing 200 mM NaCl and 1 mM
TCEP [tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine] (referred to simply as “buffer”
from here). All dialyses were performed against buffer containing
10 mM EDTA (“chelation buffer”), 12 h per buffer volume.
Preparation of apo-, CoCo-, ZnCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1
NDM-1
was expressed and purified as described previously.[19] Protein concentrations were determined using the extinction
coefficient at 280 nm, ε280 = 28,500 M–1 cm–1. To prepare apo-NDM-1, the purified enzyme
(ca. 300 μM) was dialyzed at 4 °C against 3 × 1 L
of chelation buffer. EDTA was removed by dialysis against 6 ×
1 L of buffer. CoCo-NDM-1 was prepared by titrating 300 μM apo-NDM-1
with Co(II) in buffer. The mixed-metal hybrids were prepared by incubating
300 μM apoenzyme, with 1 equiv of the diamagnetic metal from
a 10 mM stock solution in buffer, followed by addition of Co(II),
also from a 10 mM stock. For example, ZnCo-NDM-1 was prepared by incubating
the apoenzyme with 1 equiv of Zn(II) on ice for 30 min, followed by
titration with Co(II). The CoCd enzyme was prepared in a similar fashion,
by incubation of the apoenzyme with 1 equiv of Cd(II), followed by
the addition of 1 equiv of Co(II).
Steady-State Kinetics
Steady-state kinetic studies were performed using 50 nM enzyme
at 9 °C, unless otherwise noted, on a Hewlett-Packard 5480A diode
array spectrophotometer. The hydrolysis of chromacef by ZnZn-, CoCo-,
ZnCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1 was monitored by detecting the formation of
product at 442 nm, and absorbance data were converted into concentrations
using Δε442 = 18,600 M–1 cm–1. Kinetic studies were carried out in buffer, with
substrate concentrations that varied from 1 to 100 μM. The initial
rate of product formation vs substrate concentration was fit to the
Michaelis–Menten equation to determine the steady-kinetic constants, Km and kcat.
NMR Spectroscopy
1H NMR spectra were collected on 2 mM samples of metal-substituted
NDM-1 in buffer containing ∼10% D2O. Exchangeable
protons were identified by comparison with samples in ∼90%
D2O. 1H NMR spectra were recorded at 290 K on
a Bruker ASX200 spectrometer operating at 200.13 MHz. Data were collected
using a frequency switching technique that places a long, low-power
(saturating) pulse on the water signal, before moving the transmitter
to an arbitrary region of interest.[25] This
approach allows accentuation of severely hyperfine-shifted resonances
and often more uniform excitation. Spectra for NDM-1 collected in
this manner were the average of ∼200,000 transients consisting
of 8k points over a 75 kHz spectral window (tAQ = 54 ms, total data collection took approximately 16 h per
spectrum). The presaturation pulse was typically 100–150 ms
(∼1 W), centered at the water frequency, while the acquisition
pulse was 3 μs at full power, typically centered between +50
and +200 ppm. Prior to Fourier transformation, all FIDs were apodized
using an exponential function that introduced an additional line width
of 30 Hz (0.15 ppm).
EXAFS Spectroscopy
Samples for EXAFS
(approximately 1 mM in protein) were prepared with 20% (v/v) glycerol
as a glassing agent. EXAFS samples were loaded in Lucite cuvettes
with 6 μm polypropylene windows and frozen rapidly in liquid
nitrogen. X-ray absorption spectra were measured at the National Synchrotron
Light Source (NSLS), beamline X3B, with a Si(111) double-crystal
monochromator; harmonic rejection was accomplished using a Ni focusing
mirror. Fluorescence excitation spectra for all samples were measured
with a 31-element solid-state Ge detector array. Samples were held
at approximately 15 K in a Displex cryostat. EXAFS data collection
and reduction were performed according to published procedures.[26] Data were measured in duplicate, six scans at
the zinc K-edge, eight scans at the cobalt K-edge, each on two samples from independent purifications;
fits to the two data sets were equivalent. As both data sets gave
similar results, the data were averaged using EXAFSPAK (EXAFSPAK is
available free of charge from http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/∼george/exafspak/exafs.htm); the experimental spectra presented here are the averaged data
sets (12–16 scans per sample). The data were converted from
energy to k-space using E0 = 9680 eV (Zn) or 7730 eV (Co).Fourier-filtered EXAFS data were fit using the nonlinear least-squares
engine of IFEFFIT, which is distributed with SixPack (SixPack is available
free of charge from http://home.comcast.net/∼sam_webb/sixpack.html; IFEFFIT is open source software available from http://cars9.uchicago.edu/ifeffit). Theoretical amplitude and phase functions were calculated with
FEFF v. 8.00.[27] Zinc-nitrogen single-scattering
and zinc-imidazole multiple-scattering was calibrated to the experimental
EXAFS of zinc tetrakis-1-methylimidazole Zn(II) perchlorate, [Zn(MeIm)4][ClO4]2. Zinc-sulfur scattering was
calibrated to the experimental EXAFS of tetrabutylammonium zinc tetramesitylthiolate,
[Bu4N]2[Zn(Smes)4]. Optimum scale
factors (Sc) and Δ0 were derived from fits to the model
data (Sc = 0.78 (Zn–N) or 0.91
(Zn–S); Δ0= −21 eV) and were held fixed at these values for fits to
metalloprotein data. The models used for the calibration of cobalt–nitrogen
(and cobalt-imidazole) and cobalt–sulfur scattering were, respectively,
hexakis-imidazole cobalt(II) perchlorate, [Co(Im)6][ClO4]2 and tetrabutylammonium cobalt(II) tetramesitylthiolate,
[Bu4N]2[Co(Smes)4], respectively.
The resulting Sc and Δ0 (Sc =
0.79 (Co–N) or 0.85 (Co–S); ΔE0 = −21 eV) were held fixed at these calibrated
values in subsequent fits to metalloprotein data. First shell fits
were then obtained for all reasonable coordination numbers, including
mixed nitrogen/oxygen/sulfur ligation, while allowing the absorber-scattered
distance, Ras, and the Debye–Waller
factor, σas2, to vary. Detailed summaries
of the fitting results are presented in Supporting
Information. Multiple scattering contributions from histidine
ligands were fitted according to published procedures.[26] Metal-metal (zinc-cobalt and cobalt-cobalt)
scattering were modeled with reference to the experimental EXAFS of
Zn2 (salpn)2 and Co2 (salpn)2; cobalt-cadmium scattering was fitted empirically, assuming
a scale factor of Sc = 1.0.
Stopped-Flow
Kinetics
Rapid-scanning visible spectra of chromacef, hydrolyzed
by NDM-1, were collected on an Applied Photophysics SX18MV spectrophotometer
equipped with a photodiode array detector and a 2 mm path length optical
cell. The temperature was kept constant at 9 °C (unless otherwise
noted) using a circulating water bath. Absorbance data were converted
to concentration as described previously.[19] Stopped-flow fluorescence studies of chromacef hydrolysis were conducted
at 9 °C on the same Applied Photophysics spectrometer, using
an excitation wavelength of 295 nm and a 320 nm high-pass filter on
the photomultiplier. The data obtained in stopped-flow studies were
fit with either single or double exponentials using Pro-Data software.
Single traces representing substrate, product, or intermediate were
simulated with Kinteksim, using the mechanism shown in Scheme 1.
Scheme 1
EPR Spectroscopy
Low temperature
EPR spectra were collected with a Bruker Elexsys E600 EPR spectrometer
equipped with an Oxford Instruments ESR900 helium flow cryostat. Spectra
were recorded at 9.63 GHz (B0⊥B1) or
9.37 GHz (B0∥B1) using an ER4116DM dual-mode
cavity, with 10 G (1 mT) magnetic field modulation at 100 kHz. Microwave
powers and temperatures employed are given in the legends to figures,
and other recording parameters were chosen such that resolution was
limited by the field modulation amplitude. Spin Hamiltonian parameters
were estimated from computer simulations carried out using XSophe
(Bruker Biospin), assuming Ĥ = βgBS + SDS + ASI, where S = 3/2, D ≫ βgBS, and I(59Co) = 7/2, and where D > 0 implies M = ± 1/2 and D < 0 implies M = ± 3/2.[28]
Rapid-Freeze-Quench EPR
Variants
of NDM-1 (0.5 mM) were reacted with 1.5 mM chromacef, each in buffer
at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was rapidly frozen after 10 ms
using a previously described system,[29,30] and the quenched
samples were analyzed by EPR spectroscopy, as described above. Enzyme–product
complex samples were prepared by thawing the quenched reaction samples
for 2 min and refreezing.
Results
Generation
of apo-, CoCo-, ZnCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1
Previous efforts to
prepare metal-substituted forms of NDM-1 involved the initial removal
of Zn(II) with EDTA at pH > 7.0; mass spectrometry revealed that
the active site cysteine was oxidized under these conditions.[24] We also attempted to prepare apo-NDM-1 by dialyzing
the enzyme vs EDTA, across a range of pH (6.0–7.5). Metal analyses
revealed that the apoenzyme contained < 0.1 equiv of Zn(II), < 0.05
equiv of Fe, and no other common metal ions, regardless of the pH
at which it was dialyzed. Direct addition of Co(II) to the apoenzyme
resulted in immediate formation of a pink color, which rapidly changed
to orange, indicative of Co(II) oxidation.[31] We also attempted a biological incorporation method, developed for
preparation of heterodimetallic forms of L1.[21] NDM-1 was overexpressed in minimal medium, and the cell culture
was spiked with Co(II) at the time of induction. The resulting enzyme,
purified using previously published procedures,[19] contained only 0.6–0.7 equiv of Co and 0.3 equiv
of Fe.Since these more common methods to generate Co(II)-substituted
MβLs were unsuccessful with NDM-1, we modified the direct addition
method by adding 1 mM TCEP (a reducing agent) to the apoenzyme, prior
to adding Co(II). The resulting Co(II)-substituted NDM-1 samples were
purple, and this color was retained for months. We generated several
other metal-substituted enzymes in this way. Steady-state kinetic
studies of all variants, using chromacef as substrate, are summarized
in Table 1. All three metal-substituted forms
of NDM-1 (ZnCo-, CoCo-, and CoCd-) exhibited steady-state kcat and Km values
within a factor of 3 of those found for ZnZn-NDM-1 (kcat = 4.2 s–1, Km = 5.1 μM).[19]
Table 1
Steady-State Parameters for Hydrolysis of Chromacef by ZnZn-, ZnCo-,
CoCo-, and CoCd- Analogues of NDM-1
species
kcat (s–1)
Km (μM)
kcat/Km (s–1/μM)
kcat(calc) (s–1)a
Km(calc) (μM)a
ZnZn
4.2
5.1 ± 0.9
0.8
4.8
0.1
ZnCo
2.0
1.9 ± 0.4
1.0
4.7
0.1
CoCo
3.7
5.6 ± 1.2
0.7
9.4
0.2
CoCd
5.5
5.6 ± 0.7
1.0
14
0.9
Theoretical kcat and Km calculated using eq 1.
Theoretical kcat and Km calculated using eq 1.
Optical Spectroscopy of
Metal-Substituted NDM-1
Previously reported optical spectra
for Co(II)-substituted NDM-1 were obtained from samples generated
by addition of Co(II) to ZnZn-NDM-1 containing 1 mM EDTA.[19,24] With the new method to generate metal-substituted forms of NDM-1
presented here, we obtained quantifiable optical spectra of ZnCo-,
CoCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1 by titration. Addition of Co(II) to apo-NDM-1
suggests that cobalt distributes between the Zn1 and Zn2 sites at substoichiometric concentrations (Figure 2A, top), as it does in the B1MβLs BcII,[32,33] Bla2,[34] and IMP-1[35] and as has been shown previously for NDM-1.[24] The ligand field bands between 500 and 650 nm
are apparent with as little as 0.25 equiv of added Co(II). At 0.5
equiv of added Co(II), an additional band at 330 nm is observed, and
subsequent additions only served to increase the intensity of both
features, monotonically. The 330 nm absorption is characteristic of
a Cys→Co(II) ligand-to-metal charge transfer, indicative of metal
binding at the Zn2 site, while the structure of the ligand
field bands is reminiscent of that exhibited by high-spin Co(II) in
the pseudotetrahedral environment of the Zn1 site.[36] Further addition of Co(II) to this sample resulted
in a monotonic increase in absorbance in both regions, maximizing
at 2.0 equiv of added Co(II), consistent with binding distributed
between the Zn1 and Zn2 sites, even at very
low concentrations.[22] The final spectra
(ε330 = 1060, ε550 = 505, ε615 = 285 M–1 cm–1 for
two Co(II)/protein) are indistinguishable from those reported for
many other di-Co(II) B1 MβLs.[18,22,24,32,35,37−40]
Figure 2
(A) Optical spectra of CoCo-, CoCd-, and
ZnCo- analogues of NDM-1. (Top) Titration of apo-NDM-1 with 0.5–2.0
equiv of Co(II). (Center) Apo-NDM-1, incubated with 1 equiv of Zn(II)
and then titrated with 0.5 and 1.0 equiv of Co(II). (Bottom) Apo-NDM-1,
incubated with 1 equiv of Cd(II) and then titrated with 0.5 and 1.0
equiv of Co(II). The data are plotted on the same scale, offset vertically
for clarity. (B) Expanded view of the ligand field region. (Top) Overlay
of CoCd- (black) and ZnCo-NDM-1 (gray) spectra. (Bottom) Comparison
of the CoCo-NDM-1 ligand field region (black) to the sum of the CoCd-
and ZnCo-NDM-1 data (gray).
(A) Optical spectra of CoCo-, CoCd-, and
ZnCo- analogues of NDM-1. (Top) Titration of apo-NDM-1 with 0.5–2.0
equiv of Co(II). (Center) Apo-NDM-1, incubated with 1 equiv of Zn(II)
and then titrated with 0.5 and 1.0 equiv of Co(II). (Bottom) Apo-NDM-1,
incubated with 1 equiv of Cd(II) and then titrated with 0.5 and 1.0
equiv of Co(II). The data are plotted on the same scale, offset vertically
for clarity. (B) Expanded view of the ligand field region. (Top) Overlay
of CoCd- (black) and ZnCo-NDM-1 (gray) spectra. (Bottom) Comparison
of the CoCo-NDM-1 ligand field region (black) to the sum of the CoCd-
and ZnCo-NDM-1 data (gray).The optical spectrum of ZnCo-NDM-1 (Figure 2A, center), prepared by incubation of the apoenzyme with 1
equiv of Zn(II) followed by titration with Co(II), shows a spectrum
similar in shape to that obtained from CoCo-NDM-1. Added Co(II) leads
directly to the appearance of both the LMCT band at 330 nm and a broad,
asymmetric set of ligand field bands (ε550 = 220
and ε615 = 115 M–1 cm–1). However, in this case, maximum absorbance of the LMCT (ε
= 900 M–1 cm–1) is achieved with
1 equiv of added Co(II), providing strong evidence that it is bound
primarily at the consensus Zn2 site, forming ZnCo-NDM-1.[35] In contrast, when the apoenzyme is incubated
with 1 equiv of Cd(II) followed by titration with Co(II), the LMCT
at 330 nm is nearly absent. The optical spectrum of CoCd-NDM-1 (Figure 2A, bottom) shows only a nearly symmetric pattern
of four principal ligand field bands, reminiscent of Co(II)-substituted
carbonic anhydrase (CoCA).[41] They maximize
at 1 equiv of added Co(II) with ε550 = 280 and ε615 = 220 M–1 cm–1. Thus,
the optical spectra are consistent with Co(II) binding at the Zn1 site in CoCd-NDM-1 and the Zn2 site in ZnCo-NDM-1.Closer inspection of the ligand-field regions for ZnCo-NDM-1 and
CoCd-NDM-1 (Figure 2B, top) further supports
the description of these samples as homogeneous heterobimetallic enzymes.
While the CoCd-NDM-1 spectrum is nearly identical to that of resting
CoCA,[41] consistent with the pseudotetrahedral
geometry anticipated for Co(II) in the Zn1 site, the ZnCo-NDM-1
spectrum shows a similar pattern of absorption maxima at 510, 550,
615, and 640 nm, along with a shoulder to low energy at 680 nm. However,
the intensities are much higher in the higher energy pair, an effect
that has been shown to be directly attributable to the thiolate in
the coordination sphere of Co(II) in the Zn2 site.[42] The coordination sphere of the Zn2 ion most closely resembles that of the active site Zn(II) in farnesyltransferase
(FTase),[43] and the ZnCo-NDM-1 spectrum
is generally similar to that of Co(II)-FTase,[44] though the four principal features in Figure 2B appear as two unresolved pairs at ∼560 and 635 nm in Co(II)-FTase,
with slightly smaller extinction coefficients. Simple addition of
the ZnCo- and CoCd-NDM-1 spectra closely matches the ligand field
region of the CoCo- enzyme, particularly for the higher energy pair
(Figure 2B, bottom). This minimal dependence
of the spectrum on the identity of the other metal is consistent with
weak coupling between the metals, supported by the EPR (below).
NMR Spectroscopy of Metal-Substituted NDM-1
To better define
the binding sites occupied by Co(II) in CoCo-, ZnCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1, 1H NMR spectra were recorded (Figure 3). The NMR spectrum of CoCo-NDM-1 (Figure 3, top) shows a number of hyperfine-shifted signals spanning 170 to
−80 ppm. Spectra of similar complexity have been reported for
other B1 MβLs, most notably CcrA and BcII,[20,45] with the majority of the resonances upfield of +40 ppm ascribed
to secondary interactions with nearby residues in the active site,
and those downfield of +40 ppm to ligand protons. Exchange of this
sample into D2O buffer revealed a number of solvent-exchangeable
protons (marked by asterisks in Figure 3, both
spectra are shown in Supplementary Figure S1). Four of them, clustered between −10 and −25 ppm,
presumably arise from outer sphere interactions with backbone amides.
The other four (119, 87, 77, and 61 ppm) are readily assigned to the
NH protons of Co(II)-coordinated histidines. With analogy to other
cobalt-bound cysteinates, we can assign the broad resonance at 170
ppm to one, or both, of the β-CH2 protons of a Co(II)-coordinated
cysteine.[20,25,45−49] The D2O spectrum (Supplementary Figure
S1) reveals a broad resonance at 84 ppm, underlying the two
most downfield His resonances. While the chemical shift is consistent
with expectation for the α-methylene protons of a terminally
Co(II)-coordinated carboxylate,[46,50−52] the similarity of its line width to the resonance at 170 ppm suggests
that the resonance at 84 ppm is the geminal partner of the Cys β-proton
at 170 ppm. Previous studies of blue-copper proteins have shown that
difference in the Cys β-CH2 proton chemical shifts
is directly proportional to the Co–S–C–H dihedral
angle.[47,48,53−56] The 86 ppm chemical shift difference, therefore, indicates a significant
deviation in the Co–S–C–H dihedral angles from
the symmetric ideal of 60°. Of the remaining nonexchangeable
resonances (most likely among the three at 50, 53, and 61 ppm), two
are likely from the α-CH2 geminal pair of Asp124.[51]
Figure 3
200 MHz 1H NMR spectra of Co(II)-substituted
analogues of NDM-1 in 90% H2O. Solvent-exchangeable protons
are marked with asterisks. Transmitter imperfections are marked with
an X.
200 MHz 1H NMR spectra of Co(II)-substituted
analogues of NDM-1 in 90% H2O. Solvent-exchangeable protons
are marked with asterisks. Transmitter imperfections are marked with
an X.The NMR spectrum of ZnCo-NDM-1
(Figure 3, center) retains the majority of
the weakly and upfield-shifted resonances seen for CoCo-NDM-1. However,
it retains only one of the four solvent-exchangeable resonances assigned
to His NH protons in CoCo-NDM-1. This resonance most likely derives
from His250, which is the only histidine in the Zn2 site
of NDM-1. Its chemical shift increases from 119 to 127 ppm, reflecting
loss of the competing influence of a second, likely antiferromagnetically
coupled Co(II) ion (below). A similar observation can be made for
all of the ligand protons to the Zn2-site: all of their
chemical shifts increase when a diamagnetic metal occupies the Zn1 site. The most downfield shifted Cys β-methylene protons
could not be observed, except when the transmitter was placed within
±20 ppm. Under these conditions, two distinct resonances are
observed, at 189 and 201 ppm. Assignment of these two resonances as
the Cys β-CH2 geminal pair would require the β-proton
chemical shift difference to be reduced from 86 to 12 ppm, on swapping
Co(II) for Zn(II) in the Zn1-site. This can happen only
if the Zn2-site Co(II) ion’s g tensor
reorients significantly between the two forms of
the enzyme (assuming the cysteine is in the same conformation in both
proteins). Alternatively, the observation of two distinct resonances
in this region could represent two distinct subpopulations that differ
slightly in dihedral angle. We favor this interpretation, as the remainder
of the spectrum, in particular the nonexchangeable resonances at 57
and 86 ppm, closely resembles that of CoCo-NDM-1. The broad resonance
at 86 ppm also shows evidence of two closely overlapped signals and
is similar in width and position to the 84 ppm resonance apparent
in the CoCo-NDM-1 spectrum in D2O (Supplementary Figure S1). The 57 ppm resonance is substantially
more intense in the ZnCo-NDM-1 spectrum relative to the analogous
resonances in the CoCo-NDM-1 spectrum. We therefore suggest that this
resonance most likely arises from the α-CH2 pair
of Asp124, showing a slight alteration of the Co–O–C–H
dihedral angle when the metal in the Zn1-site is changed.In contrast, the NMR spectrum of CoCd-NDM-1 (Figure 3, bottom) is remarkably simple, with only six prominent hyperfine
shifted signals, including a poorly resolved pair at 48–50
ppm. Exchange of this sample into D2O buffer revealed that
three of these are solvent-exchangeable (at 50, 56, and 71 ppm, Supplementary Figure S1). The pattern, together
with the optical spectra discussed above, suggests these should be
assigned to the NH protons of His120, His122, and His189 in the Zn1 site. Overall, the chemical shift dispersion displayed by
the ligand protons when Co(II) occupies the Zn1 site (CoCd-NDM-1)
is smaller than when Co(II) occupies the Zn2 site (ZnCo-NDM-1).
These observations are consistent with a 5-coordinate Co(II) in ZnCo-NDM-1,
expected to display relatively large dipolar shifts, and a 4-coordinate
Co(II) in CoCd-NDM-1, which should induce only minimal dipolar shifts.[57−59] The simplicity of the CoCd spectrum further indicates that the majority
of the second sphere interactions that give rise to hyperfine shifted
proton signals in the CoCo spectrum derive from the Zn2 site, and their absence further attests to the homogeneity of the
Co(II) population in the CoCd enzyme.
EXAFS of Resting CoCo-,
ZnCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1
EXAFS spectroscopy was used to further
verify the fidelity of the metal substitutions, including the presence
of an intact binuclear center, and to probe the metal–metal
separations. Fourier-transformed Co K-edge EXAFS
data for CoCo-NDM-1 are shown at the top of Figure 4. Detailed fitting results for all three metal-substituted
variants are presented in Supplementary Figures
S2–S4 and Tables S1–S3. Pertinent details are
summarized in Table 2. The best fit to the
CoCo-NDM-1 data indicated a first shell of 4 N/O and 0.5 S donors
per Co. Inclusion of the sulfur in the fit is critical, based on a
47% improvement in the first-shell fit residual (see Supplementary Figure S2 and Table S1, compare fits S1-1 and
S1-2). Multiple scattering analyses indicate an average of 2 imidazoles
per Co, while the addition of a Co-Co vector at 3.51 Å resulted
in a 66% reduction in the fit residual (compare fits S1-3 and S1-4).
This is 0.13 Å longer than the 3.38 Å Zn–Zn separation
in ZnZn-NDM-1,[19] reflecting the larger
covalent radius of Co(II). The EXAFS clearly show that addition of
2 equiv of Co(II) to apo-NDM-1 results in formation of an intact,
singly bridged binuclear center.
Figure 4
Fourier-transformed EXAFS
spectra (solid lines) for metal-substituted forms of NDM-1 and best
fits (open symbols). From top to bottom: CoCo-NDM-1 (Co K-edge), ZnCo-NDM-1 (Zn K-edge), ZnCo-NDM-1 (Co K-edge), CoCd-NDM-1 (Co K-edge).
Table 2
EXAFS Fitting Results
for Metal-Substituted NDM-1a
species
model
M–N/O
M–S
M–M
fit
ZnZn
4 N/O (2 His)
+ 0.5 S
1.98 (4.5)
2.25 (4.5)
3.38 (7.6)
b
CoCo
4 N/O (2 His) + 0.5 S
2.06 (5.3)
2.29 (5.1)
3.51 (6.9)
S1-4
ZnCo (Zn)
4 N/O (3 His)
2.01 (6.5)
3.45 (11)
S2-4
(Co)
4 N/O (1 His) + 1 S
2.03 (4.7)
2.32 (5.1)
3.45 (15)
S3-5
CoCd (Co)
4 N/O (3 His)
2.01 (3.4)
3.56 (13)
S1-3
Distances (Å)
and disorder parameters (in parentheses, σ2 (10–3 Å2)). Fits correspond to those shown
in Figure 4; for details, see Supporting Information.
Fit S1-4 from ref (19).
Distances (Å)
and disorder parameters (in parentheses, σ2 (10–3 Å2)). Fits correspond to those shown
in Figure 4; for details, see Supporting Information.Fit S1-4 from ref (19).Fourier-transformed EXAFS
spectra (solid lines) for metal-substituted forms of NDM-1 and best
fits (open symbols). From top to bottom: CoCo-NDM-1 (Co K-edge), ZnCo-NDM-1 (Zn K-edge), ZnCo-NDM-1 (Co K-edge), CoCd-NDM-1 (Co K-edge).XAS of ZnCo-NDM-1 affords the
unique opportunity to examine both metal sites independently. The
best fits to the Fourier-transformed Zn K-edge and
Co K-edge EXAFS data for ZnCo-NDM-1 are also shown
in Figure 4; detailed fitting results are shown
in Supplementary Figures S3 and S4 and Tables
S2 and S3, respectively. The Zn K-edge EXAFS
data were best fit with a first shell of 4 N/O donors, including 3
imidazole ligands per Zn(II). Addition of a Co–Zn scattering
pathway at 3.45 Å improved the fit residual by 30% (compare fits
S2-2 and S2-3). Inspection of the corresponding fits (Supplementary Figure S3) shows that the metal–metal
vector dramatically improves the fit at R + α
> 2.8 Å, but a shorter distance interaction near R + α ≈ 2.1 Å remains unmatched. We initially attempted
to fit this part of the spectrum with a Zn–S interaction, on
the assumption that perhaps it represented a small amount of scrambling
between the two metal sites, and would thus give us a semiquantitative
measure of the homogeneity of the enzyme. However, all attempts to
fit this interaction as a Zn–S were visually unsatisfactory,
leading to only marginal improvements in the fit residuals and mostly
unreasonable distances (compare fits S2-3 and S2-5). The largest Zn–S
contribution that gave reasonable parameters would suggest no more
than 20% of the total enzyme held Zn(II) in the Zn2 site.
In contrast, inclusion of a Zn–CCO– interaction at 2.51 Å nicely reproduced this
feature and reduced the fit residual by a remarkable 73% (compare
fits S2-3 and S2-4). The requirement that this feature be a part of
the final fit suggests a more intimate connection to Asp124 than expected
for metal bound at the Zn1 site, but the presence of an
additional carboxylate bridge would be expected to lead to substantially
shorter metal–metal separations than observed.[26,60]The corresponding Co K-edge EXAFS were best
fit with a first shell of 4 N/O and 1 S donor (inclusion of the cobalt–sulfur
path improves the fit by 46%; compare fitsS3-1 and S3-2). Multiple
scattering fits indicate only one imidazole ligand, while inclusion
of an additional Co–Zn scattering pathway at 3.47 Å improved
the fit to the data by 26% (compare fits S3-3 and S3-4). In this case,
inclusion of a Co–CCO2– scattering
pathway at 2.47 Å further lowered the fit residual by another
44%. The two M–M fits are in excellent agreement, and the set
show a smooth progression, from 3.38 (Zn–Zn) to 3.45 (CoZn)
to 3.51 Å (CoCo). Taken together, the EXAFS of ZnCo-NDM-1 indicate
a highly homogeneous enzyme, with Zn(II) binding at the Zn1 site and Co(II) binding at the Zn2 site in a heterodimetallic
center.Fourier-transformed Co K-edge EXAFS
data for CoCd-NDM-1 are shown at the bottom of Figure 4. Detailed fitting results are shown in Supplementary Figure S5 and Table S4. The best fit was obtained
with a first shell of 4 N/O donors. The addition of a sulfur scatterer
in the first shell resulted in a poorer fit (not shown). Multiple
scattering fits indicate 3 imidazole ligands per Co ion. Inclusion
of a Co–Cd vector at 3.56 Å improved the fit by about
26%. A second shallow minimum is observed with a 3.79 Å Co–Cd
vector, and a fit that includes both distances, refining the respective
coordination numbers, suggests no more than an 80/20 distribution
between the two distances. Overall, these data are again consistent
with the description above, with Co occupying the Zn1 site
and Cd occupying the Zn2 site in CoCd-NDM-1, in an intact
binuclear center.
EPR of Resting CoCo-, ZnCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1
The EPR spectrum of CoCo-NDM-1 under nonsaturating conditions (Figure 5A) exhibited a broad, axial signal with a peak at g′ = 5.2 (1300 G) that could be simulated assuming
an axial g tensor with M = ± 1/2, g⊥ = 2.26, g∥ = 2.45, and E/D = 0.1. All of
the B0⊥B1 EPR spectra contain a sharp
signal at g′ ≈ 4.3 (1800 G) that is
due to a few percent of bound Fe(III). The broad lines and the proximity
of the Co(II) ions in the Zn1 and Zn2 sites
suggests spin–spin coupling between the Co(II) ions, and integer-spin
signals were directly observable at lower temperature and higher power
(Figure 5B) and with B0∥B1 (Figure 6A). A resonance at g′ ≈ 8 (800 G) suggested a transition in the S′ = 2 manifold of an S = 0, 1,
2, 3 spin ladder, and a distinct signal appearing out of zero field
is indicative of interdoublet transitions. These signals require the
value of J to be very small, on the order of a few
cm–1 or less, consistent with the optical spectra.
A trough in the high power/low temperature spectrum (Figure 5B) at g′ ≈ 3.1 (2170
G) is due to rapid passage of the slow-relaxing axial species at the
lower temperature and higher power compared to the spectrum in Figure 5A.
Figure 5
Perpendicular mode RFQ-EPR spectra of the reaction of
CoCo-NDM-1 with chromacef. Spectra A and B are from resting CoCo-NDM-1.
Spectra C and D are from CoCo-NDM-1 after reaction with chromacef
for 10 ms at 3 °C. Spectra E and F are from CoCo-NDM-1 after
incubation with chromacef for 2 min (at which time all of the added
chromacef has been hydrolyzed). Spectra A, C, and E were recorded
at 10 K and 1 mW, and spectra B, D, and F were recorded at 5 K, 63
mW. Spectral intensities were adjusted for (i) 1/T, (ii) √(microwave power), and (iii) dilution during rapid-freeze
quenching. In addition, spectra A, C, and E are shown multiplied by
a factor of 2 relative to B, D, and E.
Figure 6
Parallel mode RFQ-EPR spectra of the reaction of CoCo-NDM-1 with
chromacef. Spectrum A is from resting CoCo-NDM-1. Spectrum B is from
CoCo-NDM-1 after reaction with chromacef for 10 ms at 3 °C. Spectrum
C is from CoCo-NDM-1 after incubation with chromacef for 2 min. All
spectra were recorded at 5 K and 63 mW and are shown with the correct
relative intensities.
Perpendicular mode RFQ-EPR spectra of the reaction of
CoCo-NDM-1 with chromacef. Spectra A and B are from resting CoCo-NDM-1.
Spectra C and D are from CoCo-NDM-1 after reaction with chromacef
for 10 ms at 3 °C. Spectra E and F are from CoCo-NDM-1 after
incubation with chromacef for 2 min (at which time all of the added
chromacef has been hydrolyzed). Spectra A, C, and E were recorded
at 10 K and 1 mW, and spectra B, D, and F were recorded at 5 K, 63
mW. Spectral intensities were adjusted for (i) 1/T, (ii) √(microwave power), and (iii) dilution during rapid-freeze
quenching. In addition, spectra A, C, and E are shown multiplied by
a factor of 2 relative to B, D, and E.Parallel mode RFQ-EPR spectra of the reaction of CoCo-NDM-1 with
chromacef. Spectrum A is from resting CoCo-NDM-1. Spectrum B is from
CoCo-NDM-1 after reaction with chromacef for 10 ms at 3 °C. Spectrum
C is from CoCo-NDM-1 after incubation with chromacef for 2 min. All
spectra were recorded at 5 K and 63 mW and are shown with the correct
relative intensities.The EPR spectrum of ZnCo-NDM-1 (Figure 7A and inset) is complex and appears to contain at least three species.
The major contribution is from a rhombic species characterized by
a 59Co hyperfine pattern centered at g′ ≈ 6.65 (1010 G), of which only the higher field lines
are well-resolved due to correlated strains in g and A, and broad resonances at ∼ 2800 and ∼ 4000
G. Simulations showed that this signal could not be modeled assuming
an axial g tensor and, therefore, that no unique solution
exists in terms of spin Hamiltonian parameters. This species was readily
simulated assuming a nonunique rhombic g tensor, and
further, it could be simulated assuming either M = ± 1/2 (e. g.,
with g = 2.45, 2.70,
2.25; E/D = 0.32; A(59Co) = 9.0 × 10–3 cm–1) or M = ± 3/2 (e. g., with g = 2.38, 2.60, 2.67; E/D =
0.32; A(59Co) = 9.0 × 10–3 cm–1).
The inability to distinguish M = ± 1/2 and M = ± 3/2 prevents
an assignment of coordination number, though the high value of E/D and the relatively slow relaxation
of the signal suggests that 5-fold coordination is more likely than
4-fold, and both are much more likely than 6-fold. There is a broad
axial feature underlying the rhombic signal, which is likely due to
a small amount of unbound Co(II) or to a subpopulation of CoCo-NDM-1
in the nominally ZnCo-NDM-1 sample.
Figure 7
Perpendicular mode RFQ-EPR spectra of
the reaction of ZnCo-NDM-1 with chromacef. Spectra A and B are from
resting ZnCo-NDM-1. Spectra C and D are from ZnCo-NDM-1 after reaction
with chromacef for 10 ms at 3 °C. Spectra E and F are from ZnCo-NDM-1
after incubation with chromacef for 2 min. Spectra A, C, and E were
recorded at 10 K and 1 mW, and spectra B, D, and F were recorded at
5 K, 63 mW. Spectral intensities were adjusted for (i) 1/T, (ii) √(microwave power), and (iii) dilution during rapid-freezing.
In addition, further multiplication factors were applied to spectra
B (×0.5), D (×0.5), E (×3), and F (×0.5). The
inset shows expanded views of A (“Resting”) and C (“RFQ
10 ms”) that highlight the 59Co hyperfine splitting.
Perpendicular mode RFQ-EPR spectra of
the reaction of ZnCo-NDM-1 with chromacef. Spectra A and B are from
resting ZnCo-NDM-1. Spectra C and D are from ZnCo-NDM-1 after reaction
with chromacef for 10 ms at 3 °C. Spectra E and F are from ZnCo-NDM-1
after incubation with chromacef for 2 min. Spectra A, C, and E were
recorded at 10 K and 1 mW, and spectra B, D, and F were recorded at
5 K, 63 mW. Spectral intensities were adjusted for (i) 1/T, (ii) √(microwave power), and (iii) dilution during rapid-freezing.
In addition, further multiplication factors were applied to spectra
B (×0.5), D (×0.5), E (×3), and F (×0.5). The
inset shows expanded views of A (“Resting”) and C (“RFQ
10 ms”) that highlight the 59Co hyperfine splitting.At lower temperature (Figure 7B) there is evidence, in the form of an additional
peak at g′ = 6.65 (1010 G), for a third signal
consistent with a distorted tetrahedral species. While this signal
is small and in this case represents a minor contributor, it should
be appreciated that the g′ and g′ values may be very low (approaching zero for true octahedral coordination),
and that the g′ and g′ resonances
may therefore be at very high field, making quantitation difficult.
The peak intensity of an EPR signal is inversely related to the square
of the spectral field envelope width and the peak intensity of an S = 3/2, M = ± 3/2 EPR signal due
to a nominally tetrahedrally coordinated Co(II) ion would be expected
to be small compared to also-present M = ± 1/2 signals, even
if it accounted for a considerable fraction of the spins. The present
signal may arise from a small subpopulation of CoZn-NDM-1 (with Co(II)
in the Zn1 site) or, alternatively, a subpopulation of
four-coordinate Co(II) in the Zn2 site. Another resonance
is visible in the spectrum of ZnCo-NDM-1 at 5 K, a feature that peaks
at about g′ = 9.6 (700 G). The line shape
of this resonance and the fact that the EPR absorption ends abruptly
at g′ = 10.0 suggest that it is due to transitions
in either or both of the M = ±1/2 and ±5/2 doublets of S = 5/2 Fe(III) with high strains in E and that it is related
to the line at g′ = 4.3.[61]The EPR spectrum of CoCd-NDM-1 (Figure 8A) exhibited an axial signal with a peak at g′ = 5.25 (1280 G) and a resolved g resonance at about 2400 G. Simulations returned
the parameters M = ±1/2, g⊥ = 2.32, g∥ = 2.40, and E/D = 0.09, which are most consistent with 5- or 6-fold coordination.
Although the assignment to 5-fold coordination is supported by the
resistance of the signal to rapid passage effects at 5 K (Figure 8B), the relatively narrow g⊥ feature argues against the two coordinated water molecules
that would be required. The reduced g-anisotropy
relative to the CoCo enzyme and clearly axial symmetry of the CoCd
EPR are consistent with the more centrosymmetric environment of the
pseudotetrahedral Zn1 site.[62,63] The very different
respective values for E/D strongly
differentiate the predominant Co(II) species in ZnCo-NDM-1 and in
CoCd-NDM-1 and indicate that the axial electronic symmetry and, by
inference, the ligand field symmetry are much higher in the Zn1 site than in the Zn2 site. This perhaps is to
be expected given the lone cysteine residue in the Zn2 site
and the intense charge-transfer transition in the optical spectrum
of Co(II) in the Zn2 site (Figure 2).
Figure 8
Perpendicular RFQ-EPR spectra of the reaction of CoCd-NDM-1 with
chromacef. Spectra A and B are from resting CoCd-NDM-1. Spectra C
and D are from CoCd NDM-1 after reaction with chromacef for 10 ms
at 3 °C. Spectra E and F are from CoCd NDM-1 after incubation
with chromacef for 2 min. Spectra A, C, and E were recorded at 10
K and 1 mW, and spectra B, D, and F were recorded at 5 K, 63 mW. Spectral
intensities were adjusted for (i) 1/T, (ii) √(microwave
power), and (iii) dilution during rapid-freeze quenching. In addition,
further multiplication factors were applied to spectra B (×0.17),
C (×4), E (×4), and F (×0.5).
Perpendicular RFQ-EPR spectra of the reaction of CoCd-NDM-1 with
chromacef. Spectra A and B are from resting CoCd-NDM-1. Spectra C
and D are from CoCdNDM-1 after reaction with chromacef for 10 ms
at 3 °C. Spectra E and F are from CoCdNDM-1 after incubation
with chromacef for 2 min. Spectra A, C, and E were recorded at 10
K and 1 mW, and spectra B, D, and F were recorded at 5 K, 63 mW. Spectral
intensities were adjusted for (i) 1/T, (ii) √(microwave
power), and (iii) dilution during rapid-freeze quenching. In addition,
further multiplication factors were applied to spectra B (×0.17),
C (×4), E (×4), and F (×0.5).Simulations and comparison of the spectra of CoCd-NDM-1 at
5 and 10 K (Figure 8A, B) indicate an underlying
broad signal at 10 K that contributes a broad shoulder to low field
of the main peak and absorption at 2000–4000 G that obscures
the g feature of the
axial species that is well-resolved at 5 K. This broad feature is
likely due to unbound Co(II), which at 5 K and 63 mW is broadened
beyond detection. A small additional EPR signal was observed at 5
K, apparent as a step on the low-field side of the main peak at g′ ≈ 6.35 (1035 G) and is tentatively assigned
to a minor contribution from a second distorted tetrahedral species.
Diode-Array Optical Studies of ZnZn-, CoCo-, ZnCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1
Previously, we used diode-array optical studies at 9 °C to
probe the pre-steady-state reaction of NDM-1 with chromacef, and we
utilized kinetic simulations to offer a minimal kinetic scheme for
the enzyme.[19] These studies revealed that
the hydrolysis of chromacef by ZnZn-NDM-1 proceeds through an anionic
nitrogen intermediate, and the decay of this intermediate is rate-limiting
for NDM-1 when chromacef or nitrocefin are used as substrate. Here,
the reaction of 25 μM ZnZn-NDM-1 with 22.5 μM chromacef
was monitored using an Applied Photophysics diode array spectrophotometer,
and progress curves corresponding to substrate decay (374 nm), intermediate
formation/decay (575 nm), and product formation (442 nm) were generated
(Figure 9A). Under these conditions, a large
amount of the reaction intermediate is formed over the first 10 ms
of the reaction, and the rate of intermediate decay (4.8 s–1) is identical to the rate of product formation (4.9 s–1) (Table 3). The rate of substrate decay (505
s–1) is also very similar to the rate of intermediate
formation (582 s–1).
Figure 9
Progress curves for reaction of 22.5 μM
chromacef with 25 μM ZnZn-NDM-1 at 9 °C, under single turnover
conditions. (A) Reaction followed by diode array spectrophotometry.
(B) Reaction followed by tryptophan fluorescence emission. In both,
the symbols are experimental data (only 1/10th of the data points
are shown, for clarity), and the solid lines are Kinteksim simulations,
based on the mechanism in Scheme 1.
Table 3
Results
of Single Turnover Experiments with Chromacef at 9 °C
species
measurement
k2 (s–1)
k3 (s–1)a
ZnZn
fluorescence
676 ± 11
5.1
A374
505 ± 19
A442
4.8
A575
582 ± 7
4.9
sim (9 °C)b
670 ± 70
4.8
sim (15 °C)b
395 ± 7
8.7
sim (22 °C)c
700 ± 100
12.0
ZnCo
fluorescence
225 ± 6
3.7
A374
290 ± 8
A442
4.5
A575
341 ± 4
4.5
simb
550 ± 50
4.7
CoCo
fluorescence
135 ± 2
10.4
A374
156 ± 5
A442
10.1
A575
183 ± 3
10.1
simb
500 ± 50
10.0
CoCd
fluorescence
65 ± 1
15.7
A374
54 ± 1
A442
15.5
A575
77 ± 1
14.8
simb
150 ± 70
16.0
Uncertainty in k3 is ca. ± 0.1.
From Kinteksim simulations, using the mechanism in Scheme 1. The value of k1 was
held fixed at 109 s–1. Values of k–1 ranged from 4000 to 8000 (±1000).
From a reanalysis of the data
reported in ref (19), using the mechanism in Scheme 1.
Uncertainty in k3 is ca. ± 0.1.From Kinteksim simulations, using the mechanism in Scheme 1. The value of k1 was
held fixed at 109 s–1. Values of k–1 ranged from 4000 to 8000 (±1000).From a reanalysis of the data
reported in ref (19), using the mechanism in Scheme 1.Progress curves for reaction of 22.5 μM
chromacef with 25 μM ZnZn-NDM-1 at 9 °C, under single turnover
conditions. (A) Reaction followed by diode array spectrophotometry.
(B) Reaction followed by tryptophan fluorescence emission. In both,
the symbols are experimental data (only 1/10th of the data points
are shown, for clarity), and the solid lines are Kinteksim simulations,
based on the mechanism in Scheme 1.Reaction of the metal-substituted variants of NDM-1
with chromacef was examined in the same way. The rates of substrate
decay, intermediate formation/decay, and product formation, obtained
from single or double exponential fits, are shown in Table 3. The corresponding progress curves are shown in Supplementary Figure S6. In all cases, a significant
amount of the intermediate was formed, and its rate of formation mirrored
the rate of substrate decay. Interestingly, the rate of intermediate
formation is reduced almost 2-fold when Zn(II) is replaced with Co(II)
in the Zn2 site, while the rate of product formation is
unaffected. The rate of intermediate formation is reduced further,
by another factor of 2, when both Zn(II) ions are replaced with Co(II),
while conversion to product doubles for the CoCo enzyme. Similarly,
the CoCd enzyme forms the intermediate ca. 2-fold more slowly than
its CoCo analogue and nearly 10-fold more slowly than the ZnZn enzyme,
while it converts the intermediate to product 3-fold more quickly. In total, the data offer a clear indication that the acidity of
the metal ion in the Zn2 site is critical to stabilization
of the anionic intermediate and further demonstrate a role for each
metal ion in both intermediate formation and its conversion to product.
Most importantly, the data show that all three metal-substituted forms
use the same minimal mechanism as ZnZn-NDM-1.Microscopic rate
constants were determined by fitting the progress curves to the mechanism
in Scheme 1, using Kinteksim. The mechanism
in Scheme 1 differs from that used in our preceding
study, in that it lacks the formation of a product-complex, as indicated
by the RFQ-EPR studies described below. The resulting simulated traces
match the experimental data very well (Figure 9A and Supplementary Figure S6). Results
of the fits are summarized in Table 3. The
microscopic rates for substrate decay, intermediate formation/decay,
and product formation from Table 3 were used
to calculate theoretical kcat and Km values according to eq 1, and these values are included, for comparison to the steady-state
values, in Table 1. The calculated values differ
substantially (20- to 50-fold) for Km,
less so (2- to 3-fold) for kcat. This
disparity arises from inclusion of the substrate on/off rates (k1/k–1) in Km. Without an experimental measure, the on rate
(k1) was held fixed at the diffusion limit,
while the off rate (k–1) was treated
as a parameter.Included in Table 3 is a reanalysis of our earlier results for the reaction of
ZnZn-NDM-1 with chromacef, obtained at 22 °C (rather than the
9 °C used broadly here), along with an additional measurement
at 15 °C. Perhaps not surprisingly, the only microscopic rate
constant affected by temperature is the rate-limiting step, k3, which increases 2.5-fold from 9° to
22 °C. This suggests a large energy of activation associated
with product release, and an Arrhenius plot involving k3 (Supplementary Figure S7)
sets the energy of activation at 12 ± 2 kcal mol–1, in good agreement with values obtained through QM/MM calculations
on CcrA (B1)[64] and L1 (B3).[65] The associated Eyring plot (Supplementary Figure S7) shows a large entropic contribution
to the energetics of product generation (ΔH⧧ = 5.2 kcal mol–1; ΔS⧧ = 8.4 kcal mol–1 K–1.
Stopped-Flow Fluorescence of ZnZn-, ZnCo-,
CoCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1
The crystal structure of resting ZnZn-NDM-1
shows that Trp93 is ca. 8.0 and 5.7 Å from the metal ions in
the Zn1 and Zn2 binding sites, respectively.[66] These distances increase to 8.1–8.4 Å
(Zn1) and 6.0–6.2 Å (Zn2) in the
structure of hydrolyzed meropenem bound to ZnZn-NDM-1. Similar distance
increases with bound hydrolyzed ampicillin, benzylpenicillin, methicillin,
oxacillin, and captopril have been observed,[67,68] suggesting the fluorescence of Trp93 can be used to monitor the
reaction with substrate, as was demonstrated previously with MβL
L1 and nitrocefin.[69,70]Stopped-flow fluorescence
studies at 9 °C using 25 μM ZnZn-NDM-1 and 22.5 μM
chromacef revealed a biphasic curve in which the fluorescence dropped
precipitously during the first 10 ms of the reaction and then increased
exponentially over the next 500 ms (Figure 9B). These data are similar to those reported for L1 with nitrocefin,
and fitting these data to a double-exponential yielded rate constants
of 676 s–1 for the fluorescence decay and 5.1 s–1 for the fluorescence return (Table 3). These values are very similar to those obtained from the
diode array studies. Control experiments using apo-NDM-1 showed no
changes in fluorescence, demonstrating the observed signal changes
were due to substrate binding/catalysis. CoCo-, ZnCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1
each exhibited fluorescence progress curves similar to that of ZnZn-NDM-1
(Supplementary Figure S6). The rates of
fluorescence decay/return (s–1) were 134/10.3, 225/4.6,
and 65/15.7 for CoCo-, ZnCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1, respectively.Since the rates of fluorescence growth were very similar to the rates
of product formation in the single-turnover diode array studies, we
used the fluorescence quenching rates as a function of chromacef concentration
to determine Ks values for substrate binding
to the various isoforms.[71] A representative
plot is shown in Figure 10. The Ks values, determined by fitting these data to eq 2, for ZnZn-, ZnCo-, CoCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1 were 14.6,
18.1, 12.3, and 11.2 μM, respectively. These values clearly
suggest that metal substitution does not significantly alter substrate
affinity.
Figure 10
Plot of observed rate constant for fluorescence emission
quenching (kobs, s–1) versus chromacef concentration for ZnZn-, ZnCo-, CoCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1. Ks was determined by fitting the data to eq 2 for each analogue.
Plot of observed rate constant for fluorescence emission
quenching (kobs, s–1) versus chromacef concentration for ZnZn-, ZnCo-, CoCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1. Ks was determined by fitting the data to eq 2 for each analogue.
RFQ-EPR of CoCo-, ZnCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1
To gauge the intimate
changes taking place at each metal site, we performed rapid-freeze-quench
EPR experiments. For each of the CoCo-, ZnCo-, and CoCd-NDM-1 species,
quite dramatic effects were observed in the EPR spectra upon reaction
with chromacef. These effects were distinct for each of the species,
providing insight into the role of each metal ion and the metal center
as a whole.In CoCo-NDM-1, about two-thirds of the g′ = 5.2, S = 3/2, M = ± 1/2 signal is lost upon reaction with chromacef for 10 ms at
3 °C (Figure 5). The zero-field signal
is lost completely, and a new integer-spin signal with g′ = 9.2 (725 G) is observed with about three times the intensity
of the g′ = 8 signal from the resting enzyme.
In parallel mode, where the g′ values are
consistently larger than those observed when B0⊥B1, the shift upon reaction with chromacef is from g′ = 8.6 to g′ = 9.9 (Figure 6). This may indicate a shift from S′ = 2, which is an excited state of the spin ladder and indicates
antiferromagnetic coupling in the absence of a ground state accompanying S′ = 3 signal, to an S′ =
3 ground state of a ferromagnetic spin ladder (S′
= 3, 2, 1, 0). Such signals have been found for phosphonate-bridged
Co(II) ions in the active site of aminopeptidase from V. proteolyticus.[72] By analogy, then, we tentatively assign
the signal to bidentate binding of chromacef across the two Co(II)
ions in CoCo-NDM-1, suggesting a rationale for the dinuclear metal
center in NDM-1. Upon completion of the reaction, only a very weak
residual integer-spin signal was observed, and only with B0∥B1 (Figure 6C). Although
the integer-spin signal is smaller, measurements with B0⊥B1 (Figure 5E, F) show a S = 3/2, M = ± 1/2 signal that is
essentially indistinguishable from the resting signal, indicating
that CoCo-NDM-1 does not form a strong product complex.The
most striking change in the EPR spectrum of ZnCo-NDM-1 upon reaction
with chromacef (Figure 7) is a change in the 59Co hyperfine splitting, from a typical value of 9 ×
10–3 cm–1 in the resting enzyme
to 5.5 × 10–3 cm–1 (Figure 7C and inset). This indicates significant electron
delocalization away from the Co(II), which in turn is indicative of
direct and likely multidentate binding of chromacef to Co(II) in the
Zn2 site of ZnCo-NDM-1. The hyperfine-exhibiting species
could be simulated and assigned to an M = ±1/2 ground state with
moderate rhombic distortion of the axial zero-field splitting, indicating
5-fold geometry (g⊥ = 2.45, g∥ = 2.20, A(59Co) = 5.5 × 10–3 cm–1, and E/D = 0.17). Upon allowing the reaction to go to completion, a new relatively
sharp signal devoid of resolved hyperfine structure was observed at g′ = 5.45 (1230 G) (Figure 7E). This signal could be simulated assuming M = ± 1/2, g⊥ = 2.32, g∥ = 2.50, and E/D = 0.12, but most
of the EPR absorption is featureless, and the signal displayed unusual
and anisotropic dependence on temperature and microwave power (Figure 7F) that suggests that more than one species may
be involved. The resemblance of the rapid-passage feature at 2000
G in spectrum 7F to those in 6B and 6F suggest either some scrambling of the metal ions upon extended
reaction, to form a subpopulation of CoCo-NDM-1, or some unbound Co(II)
in both the ZnCo- and CoCo-NDM-1 samples.The EPR spectrum of
CoCd-NDM-1 upon reaction with chromacef for 10 ms (Figure 8) showed a quite dramatic shift in the position
of the main resonance peak from g′ = 5.25
(1280 G) to 6.0 (1110 G) (Figure 8C). The peak
at g′ = 6.0 sharpened and increased in intensity
by a factor of 4, after applying correction factors, upon lowering
the temperature from 10 to 5 K and increasing the power from 1 to
63 mW, indicating very fast relaxation. It is tempting to assign this
signal to M = ± 3/2, but the broad absorption extending from 2000
to 4000 G exhibited a similar intensity dependence and appeared to
begin to resolve into two distinct resonances at the lower temperature,
a derivative shape around 1900 G and a g absorption line at 3000 G. If all of these resonances
are indeed associated, as the relaxation behavior seems to indicate,
then the assignment is to a five-coordinate Co(II) with a distorted
and highly rigid coordination sphere, providing unusually strong coupling
to the lattice. The lack of resolved hyperfine coupling on the g′ = 6 line (strictly speaking, the g resonance of a S = 3/2, M = ± 1/2 system) means that the coupling
is primarily in one of the other orientations and is strain-broadened
beyond detection. However, this clearly differentiates the Co(II)
in the Zn1 site of CoCd-NDM-1 from that in the Zn2 site of ZnCo-NDM-1. Upon extended reaction with chromacef, the EPR
signal reverts essentially to the resting state, although the underlying
broad absorption in spectrum 8A is no longer present
in spectrum 8E, indicating that the broad absorption
in the resting state is due to a species that is returned to the native
state through turnover.
Discussion
The NDM-1 plasmid that harbors the gene for metallo-β-lactamase
NDM-1, along with other resistance genes, has emerged as one of the
most important players in recent clinical reports of antibiotic resistance.
A great deal of enzymological data has been reported on NDM-1.[19,24,66,67,73−83] To date, structural studies on this enzyme have been limited to
X-ray crystallography[66,67] and EXAFS spectroscopy.[19] Successful preparation of spectroscopically
active, metal-substituted forms of NDM-1 has allowed us to perform
more detailed structural studies, including the use of rapid-freeze-quench
methods to examine the catalytic mechanism at the atomic level.Several different strategies have been developed to prepare metal-substituted
forms of the metallo-β-lactamases.[18,21−23,45,84] Previous reports have shown oxidation of the active site cysteine
in other B1 MβLs as a direct result of cobalt substitution, most
notably for CcrA[45] and BcII.[22] We find that Cys208 in NDM-1 is much more susceptible
to Co-mediated oxidation, obtaining only Co(III)-containing and substoichiometrically
loaded protein, on direct addition of Co(II) to the apoprotein. The
prophylactic addition of a reducing agent (TCEP), prior to addition
of Co(II), prevents Co(II)-mediated oxidation, allowing relatively
easy preparation of a di-Co(II) form of NDM-1, as well as the heterodimetallic
forms reported here. Methods have been described to prepare heterodimetallic
forms of other dinuclear zinc enzymes,[85] including the MβLs BcII[20] and L1.[21] However, to our knowledge, this is the first
report of metal-substituted MβLs that were site-specifically
loaded with a paramagnetic Co(II) ion in either the
Zn1or the Zn2 position, while
incorporating a diamagnetic metal ion in the other.The optical,
NMR, EPR, and EXAFS studies presented here clearly support the descriptions
above, with an intact dinuclear center in each metal-substituted form,
in which the metal ions are sequentially loaded. In combining the
results of multiple techniques, it is important to be mindful of the
relative sensitivities and limitations of each technique. For example,
the optical and NMR studies, as well as the kinetic studies discussed
below, were carried out near room temperature, in fluid solution.
The optical spectra, with bands spanning hundreds of cm–1, will report only gross structural heterogeneity, with subtleties
absorbed into the apparent extinction coefficients. NMR is much more
sensitive, but only static structural heterogeneity will be easily
detected, with dynamic processes manifest as additional broadening
of an already broad resonance. In contrast, the EXAFS and the EPR
are performed in frozen solution, at or near liquid helium temperatures.
EXAFS, as a bulk sampling technique (measuring a weighted average),
can tolerate 5–10% of an impurity before it significantly affects
the best-fit model, depending on the system. Meanwhile, the EPR is
sensitive to the same structural heterogeneity that may appear as
line broadening in the NMR, but without dynamics, these are represented
as alternate conformations and subpopulations, each with its own EPR
response. As the EPR signals of high-spin Co(II) centers span several
thousand Gauss at X-band, small changes in electronic structure are
readily observed, while the EPR response of Co(II) in a given geometry
and the electronic structure associated with it are not easily comparable
to the response of Co(II) in another geometry, as described above.
Consequently, although the EPR is most sensitive to structural heterogeneity,
quantification is difficult. Given these limitations, we can conservatively
state that all of the heterobimetallic enzymes studied here were > 90%
in the resting form shown in the upper left of Scheme 2, with the metals distributed as indicated.
Scheme 2
The EXAFS-derived
metal–metal separations (Table 2) track
with the covalent radii of the metal ions (3.38 Å (Zn–Zn)
to 3.45 Å (Zn–Co) to 3.51 Å (Co–Co) to 3.56
Å (Co–Cd)), suggesting there is only minimal modulation
of the metal–oxygen–metal angles, which we would expect
to translate into only minor differences in reaction rates, as is
seen. In steady-state kinetic studies, all three forms (CoCo-, ZnCo-,
and CoCd-NDM-1) were seen to exhibit Km and kcat values within a factor of 2–3
of those for ZnZn-NDM-1. A similar observation can be made with regard
to the single turnover experiments. Stopped-flow fluorescence using
chromacef as substrate indicated nearly identical substrate affinities
and product release rates within a factor of 3–4 across the
series of enzymes, suggesting the metal substitutions did not cause
gross changes in the structure of the active site or its ability to
function as an MβL.Stopped-flow optical studies demonstrated
that a ring-opened, anionic intermediate was observed with all four
metal-substituted forms of NDM-1. While the ZnZn, ZnCo, and CoCo analogues
formed the intermediate in near stoichiometric amounts, the CoCd enzyme
builds up to only ca. 50% of the total enzyme concentration, the combined
effect of a 10-fold decrease in the rate of intermediate formation
(k2 in Table 3)
and a 3-fold increase in the rate of product
release (k3), relative to ZnZn-NDM-1.
Overall, the rates of intermediate formation and decay are comparable,
suggesting that the identity of the metal ions does not greatly affect
the overall energetics of the reaction. The rate-limiting step for
all four forms of the enzyme is clearly protonation of the intermediate,
as proposed earlier for other MβLs.[21,86−88] The product release rates nicely track the Lewis
acidity of the metal in the Zn2 site (Zn(II) > Co(II)
> Cd(II)) but are also affected by the identity of the metal in
the Zn1 site. Both forms with Zn(II) in the Zn1 site (ZnZn and ZnCo) show k3 ≈
5 s–1 at 9 °C, while the two forms with Co(II)
in the Zn1 site (CoCo and CoCd) are 2–3 times faster
at 10 and 16 s–1, respectively. Further freeze-quench
spectroscopic studies will be required to completely disentangle the
individual contributions.Rapid-freeze-quench EPR studies showed
significant changes in the Co(II) ion electronic structure, whether
residing in the Zn1 site or the Zn2 site, as
well as in the dinuclear Co(II) center, on a catalytically relevant
time scale. These observations are summarized in the proposed mechanism
in Scheme 2. Co(II) in the Zn1 site
(as in CoCd-NDM-1) undergoes a marked change in electronic structure
upon reaction with substrate, indicative of a decrease in coordination
symmetry, and exhibits very fast electronic relaxation, suggestive
of a very rigid coordination sphere. On the basis of these observations,
we favor a five-coordinate Co(II). While Scheme 2 depicts simultaneous coordination of both O atoms from the newly
formed carboxylate of the ring-opened intermediate (one from the μ-OH
ligand, one from the substrate carbonyl), we cannot rule out the presence
of an incoming water molecule, possibly reforming the bridge, and
monodentate coordination of the newly formed carboxylate. Either interpretation
suggests a clear role for the Zn1 ion in nucleophile activation
and/or delivery.In contrast, for Co(II) in the Zn2 site, a dramatic reduction in the 59Co hyperfine splitting
provides clear evidence for binding of a moiety capable of absorbing
delocalized spin density from the Zn2-site metal ion, on
the same time scale as the events described above for the Zn1-site metal ion. Only Cd(II) substitution had a significant effect
on the rate of intermediate formation, suggesting a major role for
the Zn2 ion in electrophilic activation of the substrate
and stabilization of the anionic intermediate, providing further rationale
for the coordinated cysteine in the Zn2 site.[42] We note here that the cysteinate is trans to the position the anionic nitrogen would occupy.The simultaneous binding of the intermediate to both metal ions
and the loss of the μ-OH bridge are supported by the RFQ-EPR
of CoCo-NDM-1. The resting state spectrum shows that a small proportion
of the dinuclear center exists in a very weakly, and probably antiferromagnetically,
exchange coupled state. In the 10 ms RFQ sample, on the other hand,
more than 60% of the centers exhibit exchange coupling, also weak,
but probably ferromagnetic and not due to a commonly bound single
atom. After extended reaction, the Zn1 ion returns to its
resting coordination, whereas the electron-density-donating Zn2 ion remains bound to the product at the high concentrations
used for RFQ-EPR. These data are consistent with the very small integer
spin signal seen upon extended reaction of CoCo-NDM-1 with chromacef.
Summary
In summary, the reaction mechanism of NDM-1 was investigated by
creating heterodimetallic forms of NDM-1 and using the chromogenic
substrate chromacef. The coordination environment of each metal site
was studied by specifically incorporating a paramagnetic Co(II) ion
independently into either the Zn1 or the Zn2 site. Our kinetic studies demonstrate that the rate-limiting step
in the hydrolysis reaction is the decay of a common reaction intermediate,
and that the rate of product formation is dependent on the acidity
of the metal ion in the Zn2 site. The spectroscopic studies
show clear roles for both metals at all stages of the reaction.
Authors: M W Crowder; K W Yang; A L Carenbauer; G Periyannan; M E Seifert; N E Rude; T R Walsh Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Magdalena A Taracila; Kerri M Smith; Yan Xu; Robert A Bonomo Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Allie Y Chen; Pei W Thomas; Alesha C Stewart; Alexander Bergstrom; Zishuo Cheng; Callie Miller; Christopher R Bethel; Steven H Marshall; Cy V Credille; Christopher L Riley; Richard C Page; Robert A Bonomo; Michael W Crowder; David L Tierney; Walter Fast; Seth M Cohen Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Allie Y Chen; Rebecca N Adamek; Benjamin L Dick; Cy V Credille; Christine N Morrison; Seth M Cohen Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Mahesh Aitha; Lindsay Moritz; Indra D Sahu; Omar Sanyurah; Zahilyn Roche; Robert McCarrick; Gary A Lorigan; Brian Bennett; Michael W Crowder Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Allie Y Chen; Pei W Thomas; Zishuo Cheng; Nasa Y Xu; David L Tierney; Michael W Crowder; Walter Fast; Seth M Cohen Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Sarah Fullington; Zishuo Cheng; Caitlyn Thomas; Callie Miller; Kundi Yang; Lin-Cheng Ju; Alexander Bergstrom; Ben A Shurina; Stacey Lowery Bretz; Richard C Page; David L Tierney; Michael W Crowder Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Mahesh Aitha; Abraham J Moller; Indra D Sahu; Masaki Horitani; David L Tierney; Michael W Crowder Journal: J Inorg Biochem Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 4.155
Authors: Abigail C Jackson; Jacqueline M Zaengle-Barone; Elena A Puccio; Katherine J Franz Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 5.084
Authors: Zishuo Cheng; Pei W Thomas; Lincheng Ju; Alexander Bergstrom; Kelly Mason; Delaney Clayton; Callie Miller; Christopher R Bethel; Jamie VanPelt; David L Tierney; Richard C Page; Robert A Bonomo; Walter Fast; Michael W Crowder Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2018-06-16 Impact factor: 5.157